Gillete 1,338 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Team King Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robespierre 589 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Ask yourself thisWhy doesn't he?I honestly have no idea, I'm sure if any of us had the means we'd do it in a heartbeat. He claims to be one of us, so it would make sense for him to shell out £x for the club. If things are as bad as he claims, why isn't he doing anything to put it right. Lack of funding, as you pointed out, appears to be the only logical answer to that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
broomloan blue nose 91 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Ask yourself thisWhy doesn't he?because laxey,and easdales r squeezing everyone else out.they dont want king because king would get in the way of this so called board, making money and trying to steal fucking land that dosent belong to them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wearethepeople1 3,897 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 I honestly have no idea, I'm sure if any of us had the means we'd do it in a heartbeat. He claims to be one of us, so it would make sense for him to shell out £x for the club. If things are as bad as he claims, why isn't he doing anything to put it right. Lack of funding, as you pointed out, appears to be the only logical answer to that.Mid July would be the best time for king in terms of share price to fund a takeover when shares would cost him 40 odd pence each. After he would have to wait until january next year to get same price assuming that the share price doesn't rise about 45p between now and July this year which is very doubtful Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveJ 743 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 He has had ample opportunity to buy the club on numerous occasionsHe could have started hoovering up shares ages ago - others have done itAsk yourself why he hasn'tI suspect he is not cash rich but there may be other reasonsCan you not read or hear his words? He does not wish to spend his money making fat cats fatter.Easdales have bought shares for position - money going to the seller - King wants money to be in the club's bank account and needs no position. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wearethepeople1 3,897 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 because laxey,and easdales r squeezing everyone else out.they dont want king because king would get in the way of this so called board, making money and trying to steal fucking land that dosent belong to them.Amen to that Easdales are way out their depth and laxey wankers just want to screw us Get them to fuck out my club Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Can you not read or hear his words? He does not wish to spend his money making fat cats fatter.Easdales have bought shares for position - money going to the seller - King wants money to be in the club's bank account and needs no position.if he cant or wont buy out these "fatcats" then they will go nowhere. surely you see this? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
glasgowrangersno1 468 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Some people get away with absolute murder on here.No problem whatsoever with differing opinions but when people resort to calling fellow fans scum etc, it's a joke.Normally people resort to it when they've got nothing to support their argument too. Muirheadbear 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marka1979 76 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Mccoll is a plastic whistle fan with no interest in putting money into Rangers. Please stop making things up sbout 'real Rangers men' who stood by and watched the club nearly die. you dont have a clue. Werent chic green and his buddies given pefered bidding status on the club or mccoll despite he offered more money for the club after we were fucked over the first time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carson's cat 744 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 I honestly have no idea, I'm sure if any of us had the means we'd do it in a heartbeat. He claims to be one of us, so it would make sense for him to shell out £x for the club. If things are as bad as he claims, why isn't he doing anything to put it right. Lack of funding, as you pointed out, appears to be the only logical answer to that.It would cost DK at least £30 million to effect a successful takeover. Would you not prefer him to give all that money to the club in a new share issue? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
broomloan blue nose 91 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Tbf I think the easdale facility has no penalties or securitywhy does the club have to pay it back so quickly,that is my concern.why cant they wait a bit longer.most of this money is going to be paid back with season ticket money. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agoram1 42 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 A new share issue. Just get it done, Board.Then what happens after that?? What would the business plan be? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 because laxey,and easdales r squeezing everyone else out.they dont want king because king would get in the way of this so called board, making money and trying to steal fucking land that dosent belong to them.Very insightful and helpful addition to the debate.Have you forgotten to take your pills tonight? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wearethepeople1 3,897 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 if he cant or wont buy out these "fatcats" then they will go nowhere. surely you see this?This is the frustrating thing, king himself must know that we is going to have to give some of these wankers money, he is just trying to minimise that amount. Heap pressure on current board and get fans to support his campaign until spivs want out and will take what the can and go Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carson's cat 744 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 if he cant or wont buy out these "fatcats" then they will go nowhere. surely you see this?Their unhealthy influence would be reduced considerably if there was a new share issue. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 At their discretion that is the case. And its EH and the Albion Not the Broomloan so more untruths being spouted about £5m in assets as security.The Albion and eh have a combined value of around 5m Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveJ 743 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 if he cant or wont buy out these "fatcats" then they will go nowhere. surely you see this?He does not need to buy them out - he wants the shares diluted to another offering. Once that happens, he will buy and all monies go to RANGERS. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC Eagle 4,888 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 you dont have a clue. Werent chic green and his buddies given pefered bidding status on the club or mccoll despite he offered more money for the club after we were fucked over the first time.Not true they came in too late and had plenty of chance to put in an offer prior to CG putting up the money for preferred bidder status. Chec McColls recent involvement. You really shouldn't rewrite history. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 He does not need to buy them out - he wants the shares diluted to another offering. Once that happens, he will buy and all monies go to RANGERS.the other investors will get a chance to protect their shareholding and avoid dilution of their percentages.IF and only if they refuse will dave king get a chance to dilute the shareholdings of these guys.they need completely bought out or they will go nowhere. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 2,860 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 why does the club have to pay it back so quickly,that is my concern.why cant they wait a bit longer.most of this money is going to be paid back with season ticket money.Remember Sommers saying at the AGM he prefers long term debt cause it means lower fees!!!Didnt last long, did it! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveJ 743 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 the other investors will get a chance to protect their shareholding and avoid dilution of their percentages.IF and only if they refuse will dave king get a chance to dilute the shareholdings of these guys.they need completely bought out or they will go nowhere.It's easier to do it from the inside Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 It's easier to do it from the inside nah its easier to just buy them out and completely remove their influence. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stfu 596 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Can you not read or hear his words? He does not wish to spend his money making fat cats fatter.Easdales have bought shares for position - money going to the seller - King wants money to be in the club's bank account and needs no position.Can you not understand the very basic premiss of how you get control of a Company?Whether King likes the idea or not, it is a fact that to have a say in how a company carries out its business you at least needs to own some shares ffs.This is a man who does not have one share in Rangers but is happy to call for fans to not pay Rangers for their season ticket.He even imagines some hairbrained scheme where we pay a trust to hold the money.What Trust would this be. I hope its not the one that is currently embroiled in criminal accusations of its board members. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC Eagle 4,888 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 The Albion and eh have a combined value of around 5mA very shrewd investment then considering what was paid for them then? Who would have thought that the spivs would disappear before cashing in on this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
broomloan blue nose 91 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Very insightful and helpful addition to the debate.Have you forgotten to take your pills tonight?they want their money back as quick as possible, why, it will have to be paid back with season ticket money.if they r going to be in it long term, and they r there for the good of the club, why pay it back so quickly. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.