Dazzler 2,428 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, Dickie said: There are no such a thing as a soft penalty, there is either a penalty or not a penalty. Guy used his arm to stop ball reaching Morelos therefore a penalty. Was like watching a Harlem Globetrotter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
five stars 1,621 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 16 hours ago, ricksen_da_best said: Sportscene said it 100% hit his shoulder and his knee , but watching the replay slowly I couldn't understand how they thought that ? MS was right it did hit his shoulder, what he failed to mention was that it also hit his arm at the same time, blatant penalty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 15 minutes ago, Dickie said: There are no such a thing as a soft penalty, there is either a penalty or not a penalty. Guy used his arm to stop ball reaching Morelos therefore a penalty. Except there is. If Morelos stays on his feet that's not a penalty. If a penalty like that was given against us then the conspiracy theorists in this thread would be going nuts. Can't have it both ways. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723 Posted October 22, 2018 Author Share Posted October 22, 2018 36 minutes ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: Very soft. If that's given at the other end you'd be going mental and you know it. Very similar to Arfield and I wasn't. It now seems we should be thankful for getting correct decisions because it's 'soft' ie other refs wrongly haven't given a foul. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
coopsleftboot 5,512 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 10 minutes ago, five stars said: MS was right it did hit his shoulder, what he failed to mention was that it also hit his arm at the same time, blatant penalty. Only found out the other day Stewart ran for a nomination for the SNP at the last Westminster election. Explains a lot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
coopsleftboot 5,512 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 10 minutes ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: Except there is. If Morelos stays on his feet that's not a penalty. If a penalty like that was given against us then the conspiracy theorists in this thread would be going nuts. Can't have it both ways. Morelos couldn't possibly stay on his feet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723 Posted October 22, 2018 Author Share Posted October 22, 2018 Tbh might have a closer look at the Tav one again, see who was grabbing and holding 1st. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
plumbGER 24,518 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 14 minutes ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: Except there is. If Morelos stays on his feet that's not a penalty. If a penalty like that was given against us then the conspiracy theorists in this thread would be going nuts. Can't have it both ways. Except he never stayed on his feet because the clip floored him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
plumbGER 24,518 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 Well seen most people think the ref had a good game because we got 2 fortuitous penalties Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,526 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 13 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said: Tbh might have a closer look at the Tav one again, see who was grabbing and holding 1st. The Hamilton lad does. He grabs Tav's shirt the second he tries to cut inside and holds it until he lets go to fall down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 9 minutes ago, plumbGER said: Well seen most people think the ref had a good game because we got 2 fortuitous penalties I thought he was terrible tbh. That's been my point all along when these threads pop up. They're not biased, they're incompetent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723 Posted October 22, 2018 Author Share Posted October 22, 2018 Just now, Inigo said: The Hamilton lad does. He grabs Tav's shirt the second he tries to cut inside and holds it until he lets go to fall down. Thought similar tbh. Cheers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 19 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said: Very similar to Arfield and I wasn't. It now seems we should be thankful for getting correct decisions because it's 'soft' ie other refs wrongly haven't given a foul. Literally nobody has said that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
plumbGER 24,518 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 1 minute ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: I thought he was terrible tbh. That's been my point all along when these threads pop up. They're not biased, they're incompetent. Most are incompetent but every time Beaton refs us I'm sure it's more than incompetence, not just the infamous hibs game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
plumbGER 24,518 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 1 hour ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said: Tbh might have a closer look at the Tav one again, see who was grabbing and holding 1st. Tav was grabbing first but actually stopped pulling then the cunt went down, as if the stupid cunt had a delay in his thinking or something then twigged "oh he is pulling me I can go down" by that time he had took his hands off him. That's how I seen it anyway after I seen the replay, at first I thought Tav was lucky to get off with it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723 Posted October 22, 2018 Author Share Posted October 22, 2018 7 minutes ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: Literally nobody has said that. Havent said anyone has said it. What are you implying by saying it's soft rather than clearly the foul it was? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 23 minutes ago, coopsleftboot said: Morelos couldn't possibly stay on his feet. 19 minutes ago, plumbGER said: Except he never stayed on his feet because the clip floored him. Disagree. He's felt contact and hit the deck IMO which he's entitled to do. He's hardly been cleaned out though and I stand by my opinion that we'd all be raging if that's given against us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said: Havent said anyone has said it. What are you implying by saying it's soft rather than clearly the foul it was? You aren't as thick as this question suggests. I've been quite clear in the thread already. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blumhoilann 6,712 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 29 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said: Tbh might have a closer look at the Tav one again, see who was grabbing and holding 1st. Both holding/tugging so 50/50, no pen? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723 Posted October 22, 2018 Author Share Posted October 22, 2018 3 minutes ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: You aren't as thick as this question suggests. I've been quite clear in the thread already. Not sure tbh. You've referred to it as soft. Seem to struggle just saying he was fouled. You've said if he stayed on his feet it wouldn't be a foul. He couldn't. You've said he felt contact and went down. Wow, Andy Walkeresque. You've said we'd be raging if the same happened at the other end. Ive given you the Arfield incident which is pretty comparable in all aspects. Wasn't raging at that, have you commented on that comparison yet? You seem to think we have benefited from these decisions, perhaps wrongly or perhaps as they're soft so we're lucky. As I say, maybe we should be thankful for refs getting it right eh? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
coopsleftboot 5,512 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 14 minutes ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: Disagree. He's felt contact and hit the deck IMO which he's entitled to do. He's hardly been cleaned out though and I stand by my opinion that we'd all be raging if that's given against us. Felt contact? Have you even seen it?? When someone catches your trailing leg as you're running and it knocks it against your standing leg there is absolutely nothing you can do but fall. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hooooootchy 405 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 1st one he's leaned into it and it's hit his arm, it's a pen imo. Had he not leaned towards the ball and the same contact happened I could understand if it wasn't given. 2nd one the defenders tried to cut across behind morelos to get goal side and accidently clipped his foot. Accidental or not it's still a pen, it's put him down in the box. The fact people think we're lucky because we got correct desicions in our favour says a lot about the standard the refereeing has became. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ger4life_1872 29,500 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 Can't believe there's anyone thinks we got a soft pen etc when even the opposition manager said it was a stonewaller Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 43 minutes ago, coopsleftboot said: Felt contact? Have you even seen it?? When someone catches your trailing leg as you're running and it knocks it against your standing leg there is absolutely nothing you can do but fall. No mate. I've formed this opinion on an incident I haven't actually seen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebooler 4,509 Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 On 05/08/2018 at 13:33, Sportingintegritymyarse said: For dodgy / debateable/ game changing / laws wrongly enforced type decisions...... Key Decisions For: 1 Versus Scum 2/9/18 McGregor not carded for kicking out at Ajer -------------- Key Decisions Against: 9 Versus Sheep 5/8/18 - RESCINDED Morelos red - No red for penalty - Arfield held, butted against, and booked - GMS not carded throwing ball at player - May clattering Jack, no card Versus Kilmarnock 19/8/18 - Blatant goal not given Versus Scum 2/9/18 - Clear foul on Jack not given, "foul foul foul" according to an official, scum break and score. - Christy blatant dive for a penalty. Goldson penalised with free kick, and booked. Pre Motherwell - Disrepute charge ignored Rescinded Rangers Red Cards: 1 Versus Dundee 15/9/18 Morelos wrongly given offside, goal denied Versus ST J 23/9/18 Softest penalty in the world but I'll not include it in the figures as contact (equivalent to being hit by a feather) was apparently made ? Completed Fixtures Game 1. Sheep away Game 2. St Mirren home (untelevised) Game 3. Motherwell away Game 4. Scum away Game 5. Dundee home Game 6: St J home Game 7: Livi away Game 8: Hearts home (untelevised) Game 9: Hamilton away You a fukkin referee noo? ?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.