boss

No problem with a 20% increase if that's what it is. Will happily renew my season ticket.

Excellent statement by NARSA. It restores faith in the good sense of the vast majority of the Rangers support. The divisions caused by a few people pushing an agenda must come to an end.

To even suggest this is a betrayal of the support. Disgrace doesn't even come close.

More power to D'Art's pen.

Will all the tables require to be paid for timeously?

Your question will be considered. Thread locked for now.

Good luck to both of them. Hutton was never going to make it here but he has given it his best shot. He will get a contract somewhere else. Hopefully this is just the start of us cutting costs.

Works a treat - got mine in seconds (you need your Rangers login): http://www.rangers.talent-sport.co.uk/Mobile/PagesPublic/ProductBrowse/productAway.aspx

The PM system is overrated.

Little has his moments. But he'll be 25 in a couple of months. We really need to be aiming higher IMO.

Not sure that we should offer a new contract to someone who is barely good enough to be a utility sub.

Ally, you win the league or you get sacked. It really is that simple.

Interest free, pay it back over the next two years whenever you can, and don't disclose it in the accounts?

Bell, Wallace and Law. Templeton doesn't do it for me.

A Northern Ireland player wears Northern Ireland coloured boots and his club runs a competition to win them. I wouldn't want them because of the colour but many, including fans from Northern Ireland, will want them. Anyone offended by that needs to get out a bit more.

Who wrote that? Resolution 9 was democratically voted for by the shareholders. We might not like it, we might wish it was otherwise, but the statement is factually incorrect.

I got as far as "ask for clarification".

Dunny talks sense as usual. We're called SUPPORTERS for a reason. :21:

Rangers First is a very interesting concept with a real chance of success. It seems to be a single issue group which takes the divisive politics out the equation, and a CIC is absolutely the right constitution for moving forward.

He could turn up at half time, tea time or any time and still get in?

I fear you missed the point, deliberately or otherwise. Why were the participants not revealed at the time? Calls for transparency from the RIFC/RFC boards seem rather hypocritical as a result.

Minutes? We're not even allowed to know the participants.

I haven't read the whole thread but has the Sun taken into account that we have a £2.5m unsecured facility available? Or have they missed that point?

Why are the names of the participants not in the statement? You know, transparency and all that.

Irish English is obsessed with our Scottish/British club.