Jump to content

Clyde Valley

New Signing
  • Posts

    1,960
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Clyde Valley

  1. Just don't buy any then Ashley makes nothing.
  2. Just as bad as Dave King not buying any
  3. Dingwall is insinuating its the Boards fault that this grave is in need of refurbishment. Houstie will be having a dig at Easdale asap. All a publicity stunt by the strewths mind you. Craigy Bhoy will be delighted he got to speak to Rebecca as he has been desperate to get into her knickers. Ah well one day Houstie is going to get the leathering of a lifetime for messing with the wrong people. Silly boy.
  4. They have been backing all the rabble rousers from the start. They wont be getting a penny from me again.
  5. Is Willie Vass still getting paid for work by the Club? If so he should be hunted.
  6. Doesn't matter who is in control next season. The majority f the fans now see McCoist as the highly paid charlatan that he is. STs will decline if he is retained.
  7. Its because your so staunch they are protecting you from this site. Im sure you didnt have an issue when you logged on to FF.
  8. No point in reading 4 pages. McCoist cannot manage Rangers so its obvious he can never manage another Club.
  9. This is the problem. I wouldn't say its Black who is the problem in the centre as it could be Law. On the flank we rely on Templeton/Macleod or Peralta/Aird.If they are not fit or not playing well then we have a huge problem. Our midfield is the problem not our strikers.
  10. If the Board actually sent McCoist on leave just now. The increase in ticket sales could actually pay for the new manager over the rest of the season. in 12 months time we might have a team playing nice football and have a hefty chunk in the bank to boot.
  11. You could give them all their notice and put them on gardening leave. You have the same monthly outgoings so its not a big financial impact.You bring in a new management team and even if that costs you 400 k pa, by the end of the 2nd year you will have saved well over 0.5 million. We can afford to get rid of Ally tomorrow.
  12. So if Barry Ferguson had said what Stewart said it would be OK?McCoist is a shite manager and anyone with any sense can see that. Barry isnt very bright though.
  13. And how do you yourself normally go about doing something like that after the event?
  14. Bill said" if what he is told is correct." Bill is saying he doesnt know if its true or not. Therfore there is no evidence as yet to suggest Wallace is being squeezed out. Their are to many gullible souls within our support so its best to deal in facts.
  15. Take a chance and give him all the money the business has at Christmas and tell him you expect to see the rewards of the decision come May.
  16. "Why is it men like Wallace and Nash seem to be getting squeezed out whilst the likes of Easdale is preferred - surely that should set alarm bells ringing for us given the relevant curriculum vitaes of the respective parties." Rather than wax lyrically would it not be better just getting to the point and producing some facts on such matters if that's your real concern Wee drug dealers mates can spout pish and whip the uneducated within our support into a frenzy with a rumour ,you don't want to be like them do you? I know you discuss matters with that walloper Graham but there is absolutely no need to be like him or his kin. Don't beat about the bush and give us the evidence.
  17. Yes its correct.BPH and Margarita have always held circa 10%. The faceless fans have held as many shares as them. The Easdales have always held over 25% of voting rights but nobody has ever questioned this other 10%. Most of our support have focused on faceless investors which actually make up 90 % of our shareholders while the charlatans in the dugout having been walking away with millions in loot for doing the square root of feck all.
  18. So after all the propaganda you probably realised that BPH and Margarita are only 40% of the Easdale Coalition and that around 90% of Rangers shareholders are now faceless investors and maybe some of them are criminals.Fair enough. http://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/2009-17465 Wonder why the polis haven't lifted this man when he is free to run around Glasgow.
  19. How many percent are faceless investors?Which investors are you really concerned about? I probably realised something a long time before you did and even to this day the Blue Tims stormpuppets have probably not thought about.
  20. Can you be more specific on "certain shareholders" ?
  21. and how many percent of the Rangers shareholders are faceless?
  22. That's great.If your so concerned about faceless investors then spend your time finding out who they are rather than boring us with dragging it up again. How many percent of the Rangers shareholders are faceless?
  23. NoNone whatsoever. Just found it a rambling blog type thing which said Ally was pish but had to mention faceless investors to try and put a balance to it.
×
×
  • Create New...