backup

Anyone still think it is a level playing field.

Anyone still think it is a level playing field.

Anyone still think it is a level playing field.

Anyone still think it is a level playing field.

Anyone still think it is a level playing field.

The club has until 3pm today to cite broon and bain to the compliance officer for assaults on Alfie and Halliday, only SG from the club has highlighted broon's conduct, we have silence from the board the SLO and major fans shareholders 1872.
All the while kennedy of celtic is commenting on how Kent will likely get a 3 game ban in the press, will no one from Ibrox defend us at all, on anything ?  

Anyone still think it is a level playing field.

Anyone still think it is a level playing field.

Anyone still think it is a level playing field.

Anyone still think it is a level playing field.

They will blow smoke up our arses anytime soon to get us buying ST’s promise this promise that, then do the bare minimum to help Stevie get a team on the pitch. 
I honestly believe they don’t give a fuck if the scum do 10 never mind another 9. 

Unfortunately  we know only to well the answer to that, courtesy of a spineless board.
The fans really do deserve better, a lot better.

Unfortunately  we know only to well the answer to that, courtesy of a spineless board.
The fans really do deserve better, a lot better.

The yestapo are enemies of the Crown the State and our way of life and traditions.

It is couched in terms that a Philadelphia lawyer would have trouble making sense of, it is very vague almost deliberately so...as to the citing procedure and who can do so !
 
Can the Compliance Officer take retrospective action for on-field incidents?
The Compliance Officer can only raise a Fast Track Notice of Complaint and take retrospective action when an on field incident, or an exceptional part of an on field incident, has been unseen by the match officials.
When investigating a potential Fast Track case, the Compliance Officer does not seek any opinion on the incident from the match officials, or ask them to reconsider any decision made. This has not changed. The decision of the referee regarding facts connected with play will always be respected in line with the Laws of the Game. It is for this reason that the disciplinary rules relating to retrospective action only come into effect when an incident, or part of an incident, is unseen by the match officials.
When the match officials confirm an on field incident is unseen, the Compliance Officer seeks opinions from three independent experts. Those experts are drawn from a pool of former Category 1 referees, who are up to date with current refereeing guidelines. A Fast Track Notice of Complaint can only competently be raised when all three experts provide written evidence that the incident constituted a sending off offence.
How does the Claims process work?
In certain circumstances a player or a club can raise a Claim against a wrongful dismissal, mistaken identity, or wrongful caution for simulation.
A specially trained Fast Track Tribunal determines whether there has been an obvious refereeing error based on the case put forward by the player/club, a factual report by the referee, and the relevant laws of the game. Every Fast Track Tribunal includes an expert on the Laws of the Game. If it is determined that an obvious refereeing error has been made, the disciplinary action taken by the match referee can be rescinded by the Fast Track Tribunal.
It should be noted that the Compliance Officer is not involved in the Claims process. In addition, the disciplinary department itself does not make any decision on whether a sanction should be imposed, or a red card rescinded.

The club has until 3pm today to cite broon and bain to the compliance officer for assaults on Alfie and Halliday, only SG from the club has highlighted broon's conduct, we have silence from the board the SLO and major fans shareholders 1872.
All the while kennedy of celtic is commenting on how Kent will likely get a 3 game ban in the press, will no one from Ibrox defend us at all, on anything ?  

Republicanism is against everything The Rangers stands for, it is a cancer that was soundly defeated at the ballot box, it has no place in our country or Union !

Republicanism is against everything The Rangers stands for, it is a cancer that was soundly defeated at the ballot box, it has no place in our country or Union !

we have people commenting who have no understanding of the OP, though the majority in the thread do.

The yestapo are enemies of the Crown the State and our way of life and traditions.

It is more than surprising we have some who with our board still follow the false God of quiet dignity, little wonder we get shat on from a great height !

I believe that the word unseen is the loophole the sfa has missed, if the ref has missed broon raking Alfie and bain hooking Halliday, both are actionable.
On the other hand if the ref/linesman was to confirm both incidents as seen and no action was deemed neccessary, that would be an absolute sensation, the club must take down the white flag and raise The Flag of the Union and fight thes blatant injustices all the way.
As an aside will the sfa censure broon for incitement  for ignoring the police instructions given, doubt it, and for the simple reason that our board refuses to seek justice or even parity on these issues.
All I do know is that before murray back in the day, The Rangers board would have roared and the sfa would have shat it, channged days indeed.

It is couched in terms that a Philadelphia lawyer would have trouble making sense of, it is very vague almost deliberately so...as to the citing procedure and who can do so !
 
Can the Compliance Officer take retrospective action for on-field incidents?
The Compliance Officer can only raise a Fast Track Notice of Complaint and take retrospective action when an on field incident, or an exceptional part of an on field incident, has been unseen by the match officials.
When investigating a potential Fast Track case, the Compliance Officer does not seek any opinion on the incident from the match officials, or ask them to reconsider any decision made. This has not changed. The decision of the referee regarding facts connected with play will always be respected in line with the Laws of the Game. It is for this reason that the disciplinary rules relating to retrospective action only come into effect when an incident, or part of an incident, is unseen by the match officials.
When the match officials confirm an on field incident is unseen, the Compliance Officer seeks opinions from three independent experts. Those experts are drawn from a pool of former Category 1 referees, who are up to date with current refereeing guidelines. A Fast Track Notice of Complaint can only competently be raised when all three experts provide written evidence that the incident constituted a sending off offence.
How does the Claims process work?
In certain circumstances a player or a club can raise a Claim against a wrongful dismissal, mistaken identity, or wrongful caution for simulation.
A specially trained Fast Track Tribunal determines whether there has been an obvious refereeing error based on the case put forward by the player/club, a factual report by the referee, and the relevant laws of the game. Every Fast Track Tribunal includes an expert on the Laws of the Game. If it is determined that an obvious refereeing error has been made, the disciplinary action taken by the match referee can be rescinded by the Fast Track Tribunal.
It should be noted that the Compliance Officer is not involved in the Claims process. In addition, the disciplinary department itself does not make any decision on whether a sanction should be imposed, or a red card rescinded.

The club has until 3pm today to cite broon and bain to the compliance officer for assaults on Alfie and Halliday, only SG from the club has highlighted broon's conduct, we have silence from the board the SLO and major fans shareholders 1872.
All the while kennedy of celtic is commenting on how Kent will likely get a 3 game ban in the press, will no one from Ibrox defend us at all, on anything ?  

The club has until 3pm today to cite broon and bain to the compliance officer for assaults on Alfie and Halliday, only SG from the club has highlighted broon's conduct, we have silence from the board the SLO and major fans shareholders 1872.
All the while kennedy of celtic is commenting on how Kent will likely get a 3 game ban in the press, will no one from Ibrox defend us at all, on anything ?