Scott-RFC 308 Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Lafferty will be pleased to see him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Brown Brogue Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 I hope to fuck this is bullshit because he is absolutley fucking brutal. Barely good enough for Aberdeen let alone us, and thats a view from a couple of my Pittodrie season ticket holding mates. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Andypendek Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Do we need a fantastic defensive LB, though? 9 times out of 10 he'll do way more attacking than defending, and much as I rate Sasa I think we've lacked an attacking option up the left from full back. Can't say much about Mulgrew other than he hits a good freekick, that Calderwood reckoned he had to work harder on the defensive side, and that his religion doesn't come into it for the manager, so there's not much point in the fans getting worked up about it. After all, people have been saying we're too negative, at least this points to the team being rebuilt a bit more aggressively, even if it's not Mulgrew Smith is after. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rennie 0 Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 i hope you are talking out your arse.... i would hate him at rangers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeGowse 13 Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Do we need a fantastic defensive LB, though? 9 times out of 10 he'll do way more attacking than defending, and much as I rate Sasa I think we've lacked an attacking option up the left from full back. Can't say much about Mulgrew other than he hits a good freekick, that Calderwood reckoned he had to work harder on the defensive side, and that his religion doesn't come into it for the manager, so there's not much point in the fans getting worked up about it. After all, people have been saying we're too negative, at least this points to the team being rebuilt a bit more aggressively, even if it's not Mulgrew Smith is after. Or he could be looking to sign him as our new left midfielder with a vew to using him in the same defensive manner as stevie smith Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamFyfe 1,438 Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Hes one of them Aww nah, keep him well away from our great club Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu1993 101 Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Rather have papac. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WerderBremenThenGers 0 Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Bets this rumour started because some random person read in the paper that Lafferty phoned Mulgrew to apologise and assumed because Lafferty had his number to phone him that he must be signing for us, summer is such a silly season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 Just do not know what to say to this. It does not ring true is a nice way of putting it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 Really don't know what to say, as far as I'm concerned a person's religion is irrelevant or what team they supported when growing up, the only thing that matters is their ability. Is he good enough to play in the SPL for any club, then I think the answer to that is yes, and that includes us, people must remember we DO NOT have loads of cash, can't exactly say Walter has made any real mistakes in the defensive errors with his signings. Is he good enough to play for us in on the European scene, then I think the answer to that is a definite NO. Don't know what left sided players are available on Bosmans, but if we're looking at experience then this is what we should be doing, if not then we should be promoting our own youngsters and give them a chance, and that is if there is any truth in this rumour. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanMac 185 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 Bets this rumour started because some random person read in the paper that Lafferty phoned Mulgrew to apologise and assumed because Lafferty had his number to phone him that he must be signing for us, summer is such a silly season. You've lost, you owe us all a tenner Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cnicholl2910 1 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 The fact that he has played for celtic comments will be out of the window for ever now with kenny miller coming back to us and doing well..... remember celtic tossed him out on his arse when he was coming through...he owe's them nothing.... who fucking cares if he used to play for celtic reserves!! As someone said in this topic.... we dont have alot of money.... he offers something we have been lacking for years...set-pices, free kicks and corner options... infront of papac I think he would be ok... he wont command alot of wages either.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy WATP 86 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 I actually think Mulgrew is a decent player Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
deekster 2 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 HE COULDNT KICK DOORS AT HALLOWEEN THE FACT HE PLAYS FOR ABERDEEN SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 HE COULDNT KICK DOORS AT HALLOWEEN THE FACT HE PLAYS FOR ABERDEEN SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. Welcome to the site mate, but no need for everything to be in Caps Lock Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boab 73 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 Wylde anyone? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordov 17 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 Wylde is absolutely no-where near being ready and if the singleminded fools on here found out he used to play for Celtic i'd be prepared for it to be shot down Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGM_72 4,086 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 I prefer Dixon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LouiseWATP 1 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 i heard this too, supposedly he was at the cup final in hospitality by rangers and they were speaking before it, 750,000 for him apparently. this is just things ive heard so could be the usual crap! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cumbria_blue 51 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 I'd rather Lee Wallace or Paul Dixon. But even then I think we should be looking for a winger first. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC999 0 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 Please no. No fenians at Ibrox please. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Followforever 0 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 I think he's a decent player but not any better than what we have at the club already. As for his religion I don't care to be honest and i wish people would stop all this bile. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy WATP 86 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 Is he being signed as a LB or a LW? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooperSF 5,792 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 I actually think Mulgrew is a decent player Agreed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 56,556 Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 Is he being signed as a LB or a LW? If this is true I suspect that his versatility will be one of the key reasons that we are after him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts