TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 You don't need to change the words though. He just doesn't rule anything out. Honestly, do you not think he would come back up here if we wanted him? seriously.Where did I say that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 Where did I say that?Well your taking what he was quoted as saying and telling you don't think it means he would consider a return.I'm saying take what he said at face value. He's not ruling anything out and add in the fact that we both know he would come back in a flash and it becomes clearer he would "consider a return" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark_ni 12 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 he made his bed and he can lie in it. Never want to see him back at rangers. Of course hes a proven goalscorer but its like playing with a man down most of the time. We creat far more chances without him and havent dont too badly since he left have we? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 Well your taking what he was quoted as saying and telling you don't think it means he would consider a return.No, I'm not.I'm taking the phrase 'you never know what could happen in the future' as being vague, meaningless and avoiding the question. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 No, I'm not.I'm taking the phrase 'you never know what could happen in the future' as being vague, meaningless and avoiding the question.You take it whatever way you want. I'm taking it at face value. You think far too much into things.He's refusing to rule it out. That coupled with the fact I reckon he would come back in a flash tells me he'd consider a return. It's simple. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
real boydie9 17,996 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 He could be back at the brox when Coisty's the manager, hold on Ally's going to Sky so it wont happen, the worlds gone fucking mad and so have I Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 You take it whatever way you want. I'm taking it at face value. You think far too much into things.He's refusing to rule it out. That coupled with the fact I reckon he would come back in a flash tells me he'd consider a return. It's simple.You're not taking it at face value - you're taking what he said and applying your own meaning to it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 That could mean anything.including a return to rangers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 You're not taking it at face value - you're taking what he said and applying your own meaning to it.I am taking it at face value. When quizzed on returning to Rangers he refuses to rule it out. Complete with quote.Don't be so tiresome all your life. You take the article whatever way you want and stop trying to grind the energy out of people with constant roundabout rhetoric. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 I am taking it at face value. When quizzed on returning to Rangers he refuses to rule it out. Complete with quote.Don't be so tiresome all your life. You take the article whatever way you want and stop trying to grind the energy out of people with constant roundabout rhetoric.No, you're not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 including a return to rangersOr the complete opposite... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 What's worse is that if he did return, he'd be treated like the returning heroThe returning hero who did fuck all when it really matteredi love this 101 goals in title and cup winning teams. including goals in europe, cup finals and even against celtc completely dismissed as nothing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 Or the complete opposite...or pickles for dinner Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 No, you're not.I am. The quote is there to see. You know yourself deep down he would more than consider a return to Rangers, yet you want to sit here and just argue for the sake of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 I am. The quote is there to see. You know yourself deep down he would more than consider a return to Rangers, yet you want to sit here and just argue for the sake of it.Well, I can conclude that you dont know what it means, then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 Well, I can conclude that you dont know what it means, then.Ditto. Likewise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 at face value he doesnt rule anything out. as such its fair to say he isnt ruling out a return to rangers. ipso facto he would consider it. its not a huge leap. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 at face value he doesnt rule anything out. as such its fair to say he isnt ruling out a return to rangers. ipso facto he would consider it. its not a huge leap.At face value he's saying.....not much. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 At face value he's saying.....not much.not ruling anything out clearly means he would consider anything. if you understand the english language of course. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 not ruling anything out clearly means he would consider anything. if you understand the english language of course.That's exactly my point.He neither confirms nor denies anything. Vague rather than clear.Dear me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cstamomusa 3,811 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 That's exactly my point.He neither confirms nor denies anything. Vague rather than clear.Dear me.I am considering going back to Ibrox as well, I really enjoyed the tour the last time I was there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 That's exactly my point.He neither confirms nor denies anything. Vague rather than clear.Dear me.so it would be fair to say he may consider a rangers return. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 so it would be fair to say he may consider a rangers return.About as fair as saying he may not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlippinEck 3,736 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 Id rather Boyd up front over Beattie/Lafferty/Healy, would offer so much more plus a constant goal threat! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nameless Ghoul 6,132 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 haha! his comments are laughable, he can fuck off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts