Jump to content

25-point deduction


rangersxfc

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ahaha! Desperate times for the beggars!

Not just them, found a sheep shagger on twitter who is getting a bit excited aswell.

http://twitter.com/#!/MSPAberdeen

MSPAberdeen Mike Packer @ @GrahamSpiers it's called swicking Graham and ur beloved H*** have been caught by HMRC!2 hours ago Favorite Retweet Reply

MSPAberdeen Mike Packer Receiving unconfirmed reports from Scotland that the H*** are in deep financial doo-doo. Fingers crossed that today's the day #hunsgounder26 Oct Favorite Retweet Reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean they have stokes at the top saying they will win the treble and us poss getting a 25 point pelanty. Don't make me laugh fs.

I think this season will be sweeter than last. 4IAR.

last year will take some beating aswell. but you are right it will be sweeter if we win it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone explain how going into Admin before the Tax Case is decided leaves HMRC high and dry should they win? What prevents them going after the company or their successors once the Admin process is initiated?

craig whyte is the only and main creditor if we go into admin he is the first to be paid leaving hmrc with fuck all

Link to post
Share on other sites

The club, of late, has been very quick to deny potentially damaging stories like this, yet nothing has been said today.

That raises the possibility that this story may have been "fed" to Keevins by Media House or whatever, for reasons yet to be explained.

He mentions "sources" within the club. That usually refers to the PR guys.

Put it this way, the Record Editor and James Traynor would not have let Keevins run with this if it was made-up cr*p and there was a danger of Whyte suing them.

The line coming from Traynor now is that administration would not be a disaster for Rangers.

And Whyte said he wanted to "draw a line" under things.

Worrying stuff.

We could do with some sort of explanation from Whyte of where we stand and where we're going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that rhag and the cunts that write for it shoul never be allowed near our home,our players or anything to do with RANGERS ever ever again,they are trying unashamedly to destroy our heritage and culture whilst we are sitting up letting them... :uk: WATP..RTID :21:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The club, of late, has been very quick to deny potentially damaging stories like this, yet nothing has been said today.

That raises the possibility that this story may have been "fed" to Keevins by Media House or whatever, for reasons yet to be explained.

He mentions "sources" within the club. That usually refers to the PR guys.

Put it this way, the Record Editor and James Traynor would not have let Keevins run with this if it was made-up cr*p and there was a danger of Whyte suing them.

The line coming from Traynor now is that administration would not be a disaster for Rangers.

And Whyte said he wanted to "draw a line" under things.

Worrying stuff.

We could do with some sort of explanation from Whyte of where we stand and where we're going.

Why should he reply to every non-story printed in the rags?? Especially one that was so easily ripped to shreds by (and no disrespect to anyone on here) fans on an internet forum! Kinda

Yes they would still have let him print it, because at the end of the day, they are a failing news organisation and are desperate to make headlines that will get people buying the paper.

That story is pish, easily the worst piece of journalism since Jim Spence claimed that Goodwillie was signing for Cardiff in the next few hours! <cr>

Link to post
Share on other sites

craig whyte is the only and main creditor if we go into admin he is the first to be paid leaving hmrc with fuck all

That wasn't really the question. Why (according to the Record and some other posters) there is an advantage to going into admin before the HMRC bill arrives. Why does that timeline offer us more protection. Are HMRC not allowed to present a company in admin with a bill? Are they not allowed to go after the company's successor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That wasn't really the question. Why (according to the Record and some other posters) there is an advantage to going into admin before the HMRC bill arrives. Why does that timeline offer us more protection. Are HMRC not allowed to present a company in admin with a bill? Are they not allowed to go after the company's successor?

1. Administrator isn't obliged to blindly accept HMRC's £49m claim which will not have been decided by the FTT.

2. Under a CVA, there wouldn't be a successor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeh so exciting that if we do enter administration then we will have to sell our players.

Really jumping with joy at the prospect of losing McGregor, Naismith, Jelavic, Davis etc just so we can have another final day showdown!

Aye a wis bein pure dead serious by the way :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found

×
×
  • Create New...