SirWalterSmithLegend 206 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 Guidi and a Snyde caller trying to pedal it there. Absolute balls. Let me explain please.Also allowed a caller to say we spent £130 to win 9IAR.88/89 £1.5m out £700k in = net spend £800k89/90 £3.6m out £1.3m in = net spend £2.3m90/91 £2.3m out £1.3m in = net spend £1m91/92 £7.2m out £10.1m in = profit of £2.9m92/93 £3.7m out £1.5m in = net spend £2.2m93/94 £5.2m out £1.5m in = net spend £3.7m94/95 £7.5m out £5.9m in = net spend £1.6m 95/96 £11.5m out £2.3m in = net spend £9.2m96/97 £9.5m out £0 in = net spend £9.5mLess than £4m per year net spending. Genius!Meaning to win 9 in a row the club spent around £33m net over 9 seasons give or take a few grand. Those bastards on Radio Snyde allowed that caller to say we spent £130m to win 9IAR without questioning it and Slug Guidi went even further and stated 9IAR was to blame for where we are today! Incredible stupidity.9IAR has nothing to do with where we are today. Our current problems all started after Walter left first time round. When Walters squad was ripped apart and the proper big spending begun! Enter Wee Dick and the chaos began. Rant over. *If any of the figures are out i apologise, i wrote this up pretty quickly in a rage! * Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 we had 20 million cash at bank at the end of niar. or so I read.regardless it is indeed a myth. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWalterSmithLegend 206 Posted November 1, 2011 Author Share Posted November 1, 2011 we had 20 million cash at bank at the end of niar. or so I read.regardless it is indeed a myth. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds_Bear 8,112 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 Guidi and a Snyde caller trying to pedal it there. Absolute balls. Let me explain please.Also allowed a caller to say we spent £130 to win 9IAR.88/89 £1.5m out £700k in = net spend £800k89/90 £3.6m out £1.3m in = net spend £2.3m90/91 £2.3m out £1.3m in = net spend £1m91/92 £7.2m out £10.1m in = profit of £2.9m92/93 £3.7m out £1.5m in = net spend £2.2m93/94 £5.2m out £1.5m in = net spend £3.7m94/95 £7.5m out £5.9m in = net spend £1.6m 95/96 £11.5m out £2.3m in = net spend £9.2m96/97 £9.5m out £0 in = net spend £9.5mLess than £4m per year net spending. Genius!Meaning to win 9 in a row the club spent around £33m net over 9 seasons give or take a few grand. Those bastards on Radio Snyde allowed that caller to say we spent £130m to win 9IAR without questioning it and Slug Guidi went even further and stated 9IAR was to blame for where we are today! Incredible stupidity.9IAR has nothing to do with where we are today. Our current problems all started after Walter left first time round. When Walters squad was ripped apart and the proper big spending begun! Enter Wee Dick and the chaos began. Rant over. *If any of the figures are out i apologise, i wrote this up pretty quickly in a rage! *Agree with all that, except you have missed the main expenditure. Players wages. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,609 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 the problem was that 9iar built up the fans expectations that we, as a club, would always buy the best to dominate scottish football, but unfortunately for us scottish football on a whole has declined in valueremember the money we were getting fron NTL when it was around, now look at the tennents deal Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWalterSmithLegend 206 Posted November 1, 2011 Author Share Posted November 1, 2011 Agree with all that, except you have missed the main expenditure. Players wages.But i didnt include our main income which pays those wages, gate receipts! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissg910 110 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 the advocatt era that is to blame. wages and transfer fees we spent were more than we made. simple Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds_Bear 8,112 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 But i didnt include our main income which pays those wages, gate receipts! Then I have no qualms. As you were Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWalterSmithLegend 206 Posted November 1, 2011 Author Share Posted November 1, 2011 Then I have no qualms. As you were No probs mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 The motive is simple. They want to discredit, or even revoke, NIAR.It hurts them. Just like they hurt over the Mark Walters Affair. Hence their desire to have TFIO labelled, falsely and incorrectly, racist. Since then, they've had all sorts of "Love Celtic, Hate Racism." and "Celtic against Fascism" slogans and initiatives. Funny how they weren't such liberal lefties previously. If TFIO is anti-Irish and therefore racist, so are all the IRA and rebel songs since, by their new precedent, anti-British sentiment must also therefore be racist. If they deny that the British deserve the same rights and protection as the Irish, then they are doubly racist for their standard is prejudicial against the British. Hypocrisy and irony in their identity and conduct were never phenomena they were ever going to be aware of. They really are that delusional. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
watp72 54 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 It was the Advocaat era that killed us. All the money spent in that period without recouping anywhere near the figures spent. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
watp72 54 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 The motive is simple. They want to discredit, or even revoke, NIAR.It hurts them. Just like they hurt over the Mark Walters Affair. Hence their desire to have TFIO labelled, falsely and incorrectly, racist. Since then, they've had all sorts of "Love Celtic, Hate Racism." and "Celtic against Fascism" slogans and initiatives. Funny how they weren't such liberal lefties previously. If TFIO is anti-Irish and therefore racist, so are all the IRA and rebel songs since, by their new precedent, anti-British sentiment must also therefore be racist. If they deny that the British deserve the same rights and protection as the Irish, then they are doubly racist for their standard is prejudicial against the British. Hypocrisy and irony in their identity and conduct were never phenomena they were ever going to be aware of. They really are that delusional.Speaking of TFIO, Is the wee traitor from Castlemilk Ray Houghton? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treble99 64 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 Think we spent 25 million in advocaat's 1st season and that wasent including the wages , theres no way we were gettin that money back in Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 9IAR has nothing to do with where we are today.This And to debunk another myth that is taking root, the EBT scheme started a few years after 9IAR. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWalterSmithLegend 206 Posted November 1, 2011 Author Share Posted November 1, 2011 Speaking of TFIO, Is the wee traitor from Castlemilk Ray Houghton?Aye, from up the road from me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 This And to debunk another myth that is taking root, the EBT scheme started a few years after 9IAR. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
watp72 54 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 Aye, from up the road from me.Was a guess really, as I didn't know where in Glasgow he was from Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWalterSmithLegend 206 Posted November 1, 2011 Author Share Posted November 1, 2011 Was a guess really, as I didn't know where in Glasgow he was from Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senna 735 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 The same Guidi that said we were going into administration after we won the league a while back?Enough said about the earl bastard. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spliffy 643 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 Rhetards. When we sold Gascoigne Rangers were £20million in the black. It was the underachievement during Advocaat's reign that these problems stem from. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayboleLoyal_atb 3,731 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 Radio phone ins are fucking terrible. Why anyone listens to them is beyond me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RatedRpoed 16 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 It was the Advocaat era that killed us. All the money spent in that period without recouping anywhere near the figures spent.shocking thing to me about the advocaat era is we actually got more money in than people think.2.5m for bjorklund & 4m for gattuso right away, 8.5m for gio, 4m for reyna, 3m for albertz, 3.5m for johannsen, 4m for amato, 3.5m for guivarch,3m for miller,plus millions for guys like tugay, hendry, gayle etc.of course this isn't as much as we spent but we still got more money in than people think too.50 million in at least just over those couple of seasons. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
watp72 54 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 shocking thing to me about the advocaat era is we actually got more money in than people think.2.5m for bjorklund & 4m for gattuso right away, 8.5m for gio, 4m for reyna, 3m for albertz, 3.5m for johannsen, 4m for amato, 3.5m for guivarch,3m for miller,plus millions for guys like tugay, hendry, gayle etc.of course this isn't as much as we spent but we still got more money in than people think too.50 million in at least just over those couple of seasons.Not sure about the rest of them but didn't Gattuso leave us for £1m to Salernitana then something like £7m the following summer to AC Milan? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goianegra 4,684 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 They're quite simply just jealous of 9IAR and want to fault it in anyway. Any idea what the net spend for them was under O'Neill? I bet it was closer to £130mil. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel Mustard 380 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 The motive is simple. They want to discredit, or even revoke, NIAR.It hurts them. Just like they hurt over the Mark Walters Affair. Hence their desire to have TFIO labelled, falsely and incorrectly, racist. Since then, they've had all sorts of "Love Celtic, Hate Racism." and "Celtic against Fascism" slogans and initiatives. Funny how they weren't such liberal lefties previously. If TFIO is anti-Irish and therefore racist, so are all the IRA and rebel songs since, by their new precedent, anti-British sentiment must also therefore be racist. If they deny that the British deserve the same rights and protection as the Irish, then they are doubly racist for their standard is prejudicial against the British. Hypocrisy and irony in their identity and conduct were never phenomena they were ever going to be aware of. They really are that delusional.I'd be interested to know just how that could be done. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.