WVB 2,560 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Simply horribleYou think if there was a new Rangers who pumped the scum 5-0It wouldnt matter to them? Aye fucking right it would Stop being so sensitiveMethinks his sensitivity may have something to do with having a financial interest in the Blue Knights. Exactly the reason we need a clean break. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G 10,773 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Fanny Loyal You know your talking pish mateIf it happens you know yourself its the same old sash bash and face at next gers pubPull yourself together man!!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G 10,773 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Methinks his sensitivity may have something to do with having a financial interest in the Blue Knights. Exactly the reason we need a clean break.If liquidation comes so be it, pish but thats where we would beIf it did happen then its just something they taigs will use to proclaim as being the most successful team ever since the old Rangers ceasedEverycunt and their dug would know the truthShould we change name, manager, kit, gender etc etc it wouldnt matter for their greatest manager if all time will ALWAYS be known as the man who failed to report it to the polis Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 it doesnt matter if P Murray had a fucking crystal ball to see the future, the fact is his bid was never going to be entertained and he knew it.but sdm said he would do what was best for rangers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikhailichenko 90 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 So forgetting administration for a moment and thinking back to better times, if Ibrox had burnt down then Rangers would have ceased to exist? Of course not. If Ibrox had to be moved for whatever reason 500ft down the road would Rangers have ceased to exist? Of course not. If we had sold all the first team players and bought another 11 to replace them would Rangers have ceased to exist? Of course not.The stadium, the players, the directors and owners etc have changed many times over the years. Yet we still think of the Rangers of 1872 as the Rangers of today. Why? Because we the fans are Rangers, and that is why no matter what happens there will always be Rangers.Frankly I'm disappointed that this thread continues the Timothy propaganda that we will lose our history and not be the 'real' Rangers should we face liquidation and resurrection.Very well put. When all this broke and the L word was banded about I doubted I could support a new Rangers. You my man have changed my thinking. Have a rep. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G 10,773 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 but sdm said he would do what was best for rangers.Whytes offer was the best for him, Rangers and the bank Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFE 35 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 How would you know what I have posted has been constructive or not? You only come over here when there's a thread to have a go at someone over. You're not alone in that, however, and it's quite comical when the virtual transit van arrives and you all pile in!Anything I've seen from you is always negative and having a go, your reputation as a prick goes before you and to be honest it guys like that you stop me coming on here as often when I do have free time.Tell me how just sitting posting on a forum having a go at folk is constructive? You go on like we have to justify ourselves to you, like your some sort of authority figure among the Rangers support when in fact you're a sad tosser who does nothing of note for support. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 25,043 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 but sdm said he would do what was best for rangers.either he thought getting Lloyds to fuck was best for Rangers, or he spun us another liei choose option 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G 10,773 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 I don't give a fuck about them or what they think. And I'm not interested in a " NEW RANGERS " I'm only interested in saving the one we already have, THE Rangers.Paul Murray knows the club and what we're all about. I'll be backing him to the hilt unless someone comes along with a bigger and better offer that's in the best interests of the club.Your quite right to back him if he can save the clubAnd your quite right to want to care about the NOW RangersBut if we had to start again under a new co then the history doesnt dieIt dies when cunts like YOU walk away Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Liquidation would be THE END of Rangers as we know them. Except it wont.Suck on that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G 10,773 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Anything I've seen from you is always negative and having a go, your reputation as a prick goes before you and to be honest it guys like that you stop me coming on here as often when I do have free time.Tell me how just sitting posting on a forum having a go at folk is constructive? You go on like we have to justify ourselves to you, like your some sort of authority figure among the Rangers support when in fact you're a sad tosser who does nothing of note for support.Casey's a bully mate Kiddin on jonesy honestLighten up mate RM is ok Keep postin, u never know you could even become mates Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudsLonniegan 9 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Soapy Soutar may have something to say, he has already spoken with the administrators as has Park. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Dreamer.I think you're in a wee world of your own if you think Rangers as we know them would still be the same club post liquidation.Dullard.You're in a drug-addled desperation of hope if you think we'll be anything other than The Rangers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Dreamer.I think you're in a wee world of your own if you think Rangers as we know them would still be the same club post liquidation.Your stance is interesting. Its almost as if..........no.............no, surely not. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFE 35 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 A full account of exactly what was said in your meeting(s) with Whyte would go a long way to giving people comfort. I discussed this with Brother Adoniram but the problem is wee cosy meetings between a select few and the powers that be will always lead to suspicion and you have to be prepared for what comes with this.It wasn't a cosy wee meeting, we asked the questions we felt were appropriate and there's a few things that couldn't be revealed in public. What I will say is having read the minutes from other meetings with Craig Whytes ours certainly went into more detail than the others plus we seemed to ask more difficult questions.Craig Whyte is perfectly aware that is he screws Rangers we will be the worst of enemies for him to have.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Soapy Soutar may have something to say, he has already spoken with the administrators as has Park.Still wandering around these parts with the famine dodger moniker I see. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Sadly it does, but it's nice to know you're happy to pretend otherwise.I heard the same from a rabid taig earlier. I disagreed, he nearly cried at my lack of despair. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G 10,773 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Dreamer.I think you're in a wee world of your own if you think Rangers as we know them would still be the same club post liquidation.I am a dreamer mateI dream of beating the scum to the league EVERY yearAnd that wont change because of some legal red tape fuck crapYour attitude saddens me mate but I hope you change your mind if it does happenI think you will be pissed off but I just can't understand why you would give up if it did come to that Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 25,043 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Soapy Soutar may have something to say, he has already spoken with the administrators as has Park.source or its classed as bullshit on here Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spliffy 643 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Sadly it does, but it's nice to know you're happy to pretend otherwise.Eh, naw. Your stance and tone is very...defeatist, to say the least. :shifty: Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Your stance is interesting. Its almost as if..........no.............no, surely not. Reeking of it, I'd say. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Have to confess I do agree with TBK there, a new company won't be the football club that Moses McNeil created all those years ago, no matter what the name and where the play, the history will never die of course but it would very much be a case of starting history again.However i'd still get behind a new Rangers more than likely, nothing else I could do, St Mirren's CEO can say what he likes but i'm not about to start supporting them or any other Scottish team. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Almost as if what?Not like you to be shy. Spit it out.Ok, you are talking exactly the way a tim would. I'm not saying you're a tim, but you're certainly playing into their hands by swallowing their pish.Of course, if you've got a few quid in this Blue Knights bid, theres a whole new reason for you to take the aforementioned stance..........monetary gain. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Anything I've seen from you is always negative and having a go, your reputation as a prick goes before you and to be honest it guys like that you stop me coming on here as often when I do have free time.Tell me how just sitting posting on a forum having a go at folk is constructive? You go on like we have to justify ourselves to you, like your some sort of authority figure among the Rangers support when in fact you're a sad tosser who does nothing of note for support.I'm just a Rangers man, on a Rangers forum, with an opinion. I don't require anyone to justify themselves to me, but nor am I required to justify my level of support to somebody who doesn't even know me, no matter what your wee pals have told you. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Whytes offer was the best for him, Rangers and the bankrangers? really? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.