Johnny Hubbard 280 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 When I saw that they were putting in place their own liquidators I had a sinking feelingbut look what Greene has said to he BBC"We have stated publicly on a number of occasions that our preferred option is a CVA and it's really down to HMRC," added Green."HMRC have had the documentation for over a week so, with each day that passes, we have to assume that they are on board."It would be awful if they were to announce on the day that they were turning it down."If that's their decision, God forbid, then tell us early please and put us out of our misery." HMRC have had the documentation for a week already !would they have knocked it back right away if they intended not to accept a CVA ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Deacon 55,434 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 I don't think they owe us any favours so who knows what their plans are Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
j1mgg 3,766 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 I think HM will vote yes but RC will vote no. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 HMRC were heavily involved in the negotiation of the CVA - as we're Ticketus.I'm 95% sure this CVA will be accepted. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil 1,150 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 I think HM will vote yes but RC will vote no.I see what you did there, bloody RC's Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Der Hammer 160 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 HMRC could on one hand say "lets get something,it is better than nothing" or they could say "let's make an example of Rangers as a warning to others,don't fuck with us".I think they will take the first option as they know football generates some amount of tax and they have now closed the EBT loophole the chances are no one will be going down the route Murray took us down anyway.I hope i am right. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guardian 4,281 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 I'm more convinced every day the CVA will be accepted. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 My source tells me HMRC will approve the CVA. He's 100% sure of this Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 My other source tells me HMRC will not approve the CVA. He's 100% sure of this Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loyalfollower 1,543 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 I like to live with optimism, I know a few small business owners who've succesfully agreed c.v.a's. And the fact I saw on sky yesterday that portsmouths c.v.a was for 2p in the pound makes ours look like a gold mine!!! Its the rhabbid haters from hampdump im more worried about Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sobatai 70 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 HMRC could on one hand say "lets get something,it is better than nothing" or they could say "let's make an example of Rangers as a warning to others,don't fuck with us".I think they will take the first option as they know football generates some amount of tax and they have now closed the EBT loophole the chances are no one will be going down the route Murray took us down anyway.I hope i am right. In all honesty, the pittance being offered is neither here nor there as far as the public purse is concerned ... what will HMRC end up with after Duff and Phelps has received its wedge? A few hundred thousand? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray 105 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 What happens when we sue HMRC after they lose the FTTT. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 My other source tells me HMRC will not approve the CVA. He's 100% sure of this So its a 'Maybes aye - maybes no' according to your sources...... my source says '.. Baby dont worry - cause every little thing is going to be alright..' Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sobatai 70 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 What happens when we sue HMRC after they lose the FTTT.Nothing. Rangers isn't about to sue HMRC. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray 105 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Nothing. Rangers isn't about to sue HMRC.I wouldn't be so sure about that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gillete 1,338 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 They done that with Leeds Waited till the last day Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G 10,773 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Better off guessing who will win the England gameWhatever happens next week, we will always remainAd whyte and murray will always be cunts Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 So its a 'Maybes aye - maybes no' according to your sources...... my source says '.. Baby dont worry - cause every little thing is going to be alright..' How dare you doubt my sources? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Hubbard 280 Posted June 9, 2012 Author Share Posted June 9, 2012 They done that with Leeds Waited till the last daymmmmm...was that a rejection of a CVA ?...if so, me no likeeI've heard "financial experts" on the wireless saying they couldn't believe HMRC and Ticketus had not been in the loop for this CVA proposal. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sobatai 70 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 I wouldn't be so sure about that. I would. For one thing, the cost would be astronomical and HMRC could drag it out forever and a day. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sobatai 70 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 mmmmm...was that a rejection of a CVA ?...if so, me no likeeI've heard "financial experts" on the wireless saying they couldn't believe HMRC and Ticketus had not been in the loop for this CVA proposal.HMRC challenged the Leeds United CVA minutes before the end of the twenty-eight day "cooling off period", although that was as a result of Ken Bates altering one of the clauses. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Hubbard 280 Posted June 9, 2012 Author Share Posted June 9, 2012 HMRC challenged the Leeds United CVA minutes before the end of the twenty-eight day "cooling off period", although that was as a result of Ken Bates altering one of the clauses.so they originally approved the CVA, then a clause was altered after the approval.........any idea what that clause was...... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ger50champ 300 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 HMRC could on one hand say "lets get something,it is better than nothing" or they could say "let's make an example of Rangers as a warning to others,don't fuck with us".I think they will take the first option as they know football generates some amount of tax and they have now closed the EBT loophole the chances are no one will be going down the route Murray took us down anyway.I hope i am right. I believe it is Hmrcs intention to still do both .Cva will be approved but the big tax case is not included in Cva so they will still try to make example of us Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray 105 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 I would. For one thing, the cost would be astronomical and HMRC could drag it out forever and a day.Why would it cost the winning side anything, and it wouldn't be drawn out as a prima facie case. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 How dare you doubt my sources? I know your sources are impeccible as one of them will be right and you will be able to say my source predicted this!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.