Jump to content

Dave king


Raghead

Recommended Posts

Has his tax shite in SA been sorted then

http://local.stv.tv/...-order-revoked/

Former Rangers director Dave King has had a restraint order against him in Scotland revoked.

The Johannesburg-based businessman had the restraint order taken out against him by the South African Revenue Service, which has been involved in a long-running dispute with him.

In Scotland the order was enforced by the Crown Office, which prevented the 57-year-old from dealing in "realisable assets", which prevented him from being able to invest in any Scottish companies, including Rangers.

Mr King is accused by the South African authorities of transferring the assets of his financial risk management consultancy firm, Ben Nevis, to Metlika Trading Limited after his old company was pursued for a £222m tax bill by the country’s revenue service.

The restraint order was initially taken out against Mr King in 2006 after he was charged with criminal offences involving alleged tax evasion and breaches of exchange control regulations in relation to the transfer between Ben Nevis and Metlika.

He claims to have invested around £20m in Rangers oldco, formerly The Rangers Football Club plc, in 2000. This led to him owning a 5.3% stake in the company through Metlika.

In a Court of Session action earlier this month, Mr King was successful in revoking the restraint order against him as an individual, although the court action remains in force in Scotland against Metlika.

A Crown Office spokesman said: "Following a request by the South African prosecuting authorities restraint was sought by the Crown in 2006 of assets of David King and Metlika Trading Limited, a company associated with David King. Part of the property held by Metlika included a shareholding in Rangers FC. The court granted a restraint order on 29th June 2006.

"The court recalled the restraint order in respect of King on Friday 9 November 2012. The restraint order in respect of Metlika remains in force."

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I think we're fine the way we are. Regardless of what he's done in the past, I'm not sure I want someone fresh off such a case to be running our club.

as long as we seek the appropriate assurances and such like, if someone is wanting to invests heavily, then i dont think we are in a position to say no.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't need King. His acquittal was more to do with SARS poor case than any innocence.

If he gave us money before, thats great, but that doesn't entitle him to any future options.

We have put together a board of reputable standing and I'd like us to keep it that way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't need King. His acquittal was more to do with SARS poor case than any innocence.

If he gave us money before, thats great, but that doesn't entitle him to any future options.

We have put together a board of reputable standing and I'd like us to keep it that way.

Aquittal means innocent in my book, I would be happy to see Dave King investing but I dont want a single owner again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...