RTC (hope you guys don't mind)

[Shane 338]

Hi! I'm never around, I know. Surprisingly busy

Anyway, wee story over at the site today I though you might enjoy, and you can click right about here.

I'm sure someone will copy an paste it soon enough

[bluepeter 5,627]

Hopefully people give you the hits even if someone copies and pastes

If your info is correct that's excellent news!

[El Carpintero 546]

Hit the site peeps. Good work Shane.

[Shane 338]

Cheers, lads. Been a fun night to say the least

[Sea Bear 283]

Hit the site up, but if you can't, great news if this is in fact the case.

RTC knocked back or locked up?

By Shane Nicholson | CRO Executive Editor

Late last night (or early morning if you're 95% of our readers) there was an interesting message waiting for me when I returned to my desk from the kitchen, one that summed up a great many lessons we've learned about the Skiddish media in the fallout of the FTTT and the collapse of their primary source, the discredited Rangers Tax Case blog. Most importantly, it was one from a trusted source.

I'll lay out the facts in the simplest terms possible, so as to avoid muddling what was relayed our way:

The 37-year-old reported as having been arrested on 22 November was the Rangers Tax Case blogger. (Thanksgiving in the States. Surely a coincidence.)

The media danced around this by portraying it as an arrest connected to the disgraced site, and pairing it with the story that David Murray was going to hunt down the leaks. They were willing to report this man's every anonymous word but not his name upon his being taken in by Strathclyde's finest. Yes, they know, and they're not reporting it.

Oh, and there's the little bit about how he works for either HMRC or the Tribunal Service.

Hopefully that narrows down the shortlist for some of you. Might go a ways to explaining why that wee site was wiped clean within hours and the Twitter fell suddenly silent.

Still haven't signed that petition? You may be running out of time.

Hell, we may not even need it after all.

[TMB 14,167]

What action did the Police take? Has this Blogger been charged, released, let off, etc?

Why aren't the media reporting this if true?

[paisleyroad 894]

Can't be true as it was not front page of the Daily Rhecord . . . . . Oh wait

Hopefully your source correct as that lot have been insinuating it was an irate Bear.

[Shane 338]

Say what I said on twitter: Many of you would know my source and consider him trustworthy. I just reported what was handed to us and nothing more. The rest of the details hopefully persons with better shovels can get into.

[paisleyroad 894]

Say what I said on twitter: Many of you would know my source and consider him trustworthy. I just reported what was handed to us and nothing more. The rest of the details hopefully persons with better shovels can get into.

What's your twitter Shane?

PM if need be

[Shane 338]

What's your twitter Shane?

PM if need be

@ofvoid, mate. No biggie, it's on the site

[AlBear. 8,499]

22 November, my birthday. Best gift ever.

[Shane 338]

22 November, my birthday. Best gift ever.

Had I know this on Thanksgiving I would've gotten much much more drunk

[AlBear. 8,499]

Had I know this on Thanksgiving I would've gotten much much more drunk

Makes the Saturday celebration even sweeter. Cheers Shane.

[Carsons Dog 9,878]

Can't be true as it was not front page of the Daily Rhecord . . . . . Oh wait

Nah they had the Celtc playing terrorist on the front page that day............Oh wait

[Hossy 42]

Oh Shane. Shane, Shane, Shane you little beauty

This is excellent news.

[Albertz123 598]

Names, please.

[RFC55 109,314]

Mate how sure are you on this?

As I know for a fact a bear was done on or around that date for posts online in relation to the RTC

[Gaz92 966]

Completely forgot about this. Very interesting to see the next steps (if we ever do!)

[Gaz92 966]

Mate how sure are you on this?

As I know for a fact a bear was done on or around that date for posts online in relation to the RTC

He did says he's only passing on information he received, to be fair.

[markybear 136]

Mate how sure are you on this?

As I know for a fact a bear was done on or around that date for posts online in relation to the RTC

I also know that it wasn't the RTC blogger and in fact it was a bear.

[paisleyroad 894]

Mate how sure are you on this?

As I know for a fact a bear was done on or around that date for posts online in relation to the RTC

there was only one mentioned in the media . . . . . that'll have been the Bear then

seriously though, i agree with Rfc52, would need to be certain on this, surely there would have been one journo willing to reveal this info?

[RFC55 109,314]

there was only one mentioned in the media . . . . . that'll have been the Bear then

seriously though, i agree with Rfc52, would need to be certain on this, surely there would have been one journo willing to reveal this info?

I had heard that it was a Rangers fan! I was then told by someone who knows him, it was a Rangers fan!

That is the reason the warnings are now all over the site, before you post etc!

I would it to be the RTC blogger but the arrest I know of at that time was that of a Rangers fan!

[dougie76 15,359]

Whoever it is will be appearing at Glasgow sheriff court on Dec 20th, according to the herald.

[markybear 136]

there was only one mentioned in the media . . . . . that'll have been the Bear then

seriously though, i agree with Rfc52, would need to be certain on this, surely there would have been one journo willing to reveal this info?

As u say the arrest and this linked thread below aren't coincidental

http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=242733

[Spectre 1,663]

22 November, my birthday. Best gift ever.

Same here.

As for the identity, is there any clue in the dates? Did the rtc blog and its information pretty date the case being passed to the tribunals service for example? It's still widely thought that there are quite a few rtc bloggers so could be one from each tbh.