Lemmon unhappy at verdict

[grainger 10]

Slap it up the hate filled taig fatherless scum::As for keeping his opinion to a later day> Who's going to write it for him<

[We Will Follow Rangers 13,020]

8 pages devoted to that Untermensch?

jist naw

[MisterC 12,444]

The official scum club site has also released a statement similar to Lemmon's, so I think Rangers will have to make a response.

Why would we even dignify that? Lets be better than that. The only thing worse than being about, is not being talked about, as a wise sage once said

[Botto 1690 3]

Fuck Lennon !!

I've just had my tea , ill spew thinking bout that wee Ira fucker , who really gives a flying fuck to what he says , watched interview his teeth are turning blue !!!!

Hope the BROX rocks tomorrow I know for sure ill be tryingy best to get the party started

WRTP

[wearethepeople1 3,897]

breaking news on ssn

celtic are "surprised" about the decision

have these scum released an official statement about this?

if so we need to go on the offensive

i can handle lemmons bitter ramblings, but if they are going down the official route to comment on our business then we must fight fire with fire

[scarkev 3,540]

I don't think so,

I share the sentiments about his lack of class etc. but he cannot be allowed to share his vile opinion with every newspaper and broadcaster and peddle it as factual,

his bitterness betrayed him again, much as he tried he couldn't shut up, now there is an open opportunity for the club to respond and publicly humiliate him.

Don't think we should pass that up

Maybe you are right but it's important that any response doesn't become a tit for tat with opinions....we should just present the facts and let him dig his on hole....if they are publishing views on this on their official site then that Is different because if there is any suggestion of wrongdoing they leave themselves open to libel!

[OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475]

Ahahaha the club have issued a statement now!

[cstamomusa 3,811]

Why would we even dignify that? Lets be better than that. The only thing worse than being about, is not being talked about, as a wise sage once said

True they are using the daily rhebel as their source; therefore, it must be accurate

[Dennis 1,011]

Celic releasing statements now. Bitter minging bastards.

[scarkev 3,540]

Ahahaha the club have issued a statement now!

Ha ha ha making a statement about a rival club? Surely that can't be allowed? They trully are a classless group of pathetic scumbags!

[Botto 1690 3]

After all the fuss and acres of trees felled to supply the insatiable lust to see Rangers punished for actions they did not do, the Scottish Premier League Commission under Lord Nimmo-Smith clearly points out that Rangers did not cheat and did not gain any competitive advantage for having Employee Benefit Trusts.

- Rangers retain titles following probe

It was a verdict that Rangers and the fans were endlessly repeating before it happened, but no-one wanted to listen. In this case it was guilt before innocence that seemed to spread uncontrollably until there were few who did not believe their fictional stories were fact. Daily newspapers told us how much the club had cheated since 2000 and wondered how many titles would be taken - not if they should be taken. Yes, it actually went that far.

But worse, the Scottish Premier League and Scottish Football Association, the noble guardians of the game, had decided in the summer to take titles and cups from Rangers without any due process. In no other sport in the world would the governing bodies openly suggest taking away hard won achievement because they assumed the worst, rather than wait for small things like evidence.

This in itself shows the feeding frenzy that Scotland had at the time. If Charles Green had not refused the title stripping deal (imagine if he had been some anonymous businessman from elsewhere who did not care?) then the Light Blues would have lost those wins.

But jaws have dropped and excuses are now being made. They had no evidence of cheating. Rangers did nothing wrong on the park or in trying to gain an unfair sporting advantage. It's Rangers and especially the fans, who are victims of Craig Whyte and his treatment of the club, no-one else.

On Thursday Rangers manager Ally McCoist spoke of his delight that "the result of the Commission has totally vindicated the entire club" and his relief that it was over. He pointed out that "to have something like that levelled at you [cheating] is pretty outrageous and I'm thrilled for all the fans, for the staff and all the players that a sensible outcome has been reached."

It was typical of a man who has shown incredible strength and dignity through a terrible twelve months and was one of those making it clear to new boy Charles Green that under no circumstances should he accept title-stripping for a place in SFL1. The Rangers CEO has been getting the praise for refusing to do so, and of course that is proper, but let's not forget it was the manager who was making sure the fans were not being sold out.

And although he didn't go into why there was such a whirlwind of innuendo taking the place of facts, others should. Who at the SFA and SPL believed Rangers should be stripped of titles for no reason and why? Why did the SPL wait until Rangers were in administration to set up a commission they could have done at any time in a decade? Who made those decisions and why? Who were the people who had decided Rangers' guilt by gossip and who were willing to go to incredible lengths to damage the club? If the right people ask these questions and demand answers then all will be revealed.

Yet, as bad as 2012 was for the Rangers it could have been worse. If some physicists and cosmologists are correct and there really are parallel universes that are created after every decision we make, then in one there is a Rangers Football Club that is totally destroyed, with titles stripped from the SFA and SPL, while those officials and club Chairmen are making themselves popular by telling Scotland how opposed they are to cheating and that they will take action regardless of the club. The fans will be protesting but against a media who have largely also decided on guilt, then they stand alone.

That was very nearly our world and that should shame Scottish football.

[Botto 1690 3]

After all the fuss and acres of trees felled to supply the insatiable lust to see Rangers punished for actions they did not do, the Scottish Premier League Commission under Lord Nimmo-Smith clearly points out that Rangers did not cheat and did not gain any competitive advantage for having Employee Benefit Trusts.

- Rangers retain titles following probe

It was a verdict that Rangers and the fans were endlessly repeating before it happened, but no-one wanted to listen. In this case it was guilt before innocence that seemed to spread uncontrollably until there were few who did not believe their fictional stories were fact. Daily newspapers told us how much the club had cheated since 2000 and wondered how many titles would be taken - not if they should be taken. Yes, it actually went that far.

But worse, the Scottish Premier League and Scottish Football Association, the noble guardians of the game, had decided in the summer to take titles and cups from Rangers without any due process. In no other sport in the world would the governing bodies openly suggest taking away hard won achievement because they assumed the worst, rather than wait for small things like evidence.

This in itself shows the feeding frenzy that Scotland had at the time. If Charles Green had not refused the title stripping deal (imagine if he had been some anonymous businessman from elsewhere who did not care?) then the Light Blues would have lost those wins.

But jaws have dropped and excuses are now being made. They had no evidence of cheating. Rangers did nothing wrong on the park or in trying to gain an unfair sporting advantage. It's Rangers and especially the fans, who are victims of Craig Whyte and his treatment of the club, no-one else.

On Thursday Rangers manager Ally McCoist spoke of his delight that "the result of the Commission has totally vindicated the entire club" and his relief that it was over. He pointed out that "to have something like that levelled at you [cheating] is pretty outrageous and I'm thrilled for all the fans, for the staff and all the players that a sensible outcome has been reached."

It was typical of a man who has shown incredible strength and dignity through a terrible twelve months and was one of those making it clear to new boy Charles Green that under no circumstances should he accept title-stripping for a place in SFL1. The Rangers CEO has been getting the praise for refusing to do so, and of course that is proper, but let's not forget it was the manager who was making sure the fans were not being sold out.

And although he didn't go into why there was such a whirlwind of innuendo taking the place of facts, others should. Who at the SFA and SPL believed Rangers should be stripped of titles for no reason and why? Why did the SPL wait until Rangers were in administration to set up a commission they could have done at any time in a decade? Who made those decisions and why? Who were the people who had decided Rangers' guilt by gossip and who were willing to go to incredible lengths to damage the club? If the right people ask these questions and demand answers then all will be revealed.

Yet, as bad as 2012 was for the Rangers it could have been worse. If some physicists and cosmologists are correct and there really are parallel universes that are created after every decision we make, then in one there is a Rangers Football Club that is totally destroyed, with titles stripped from the SFA and SPL, while those officials and club Chairmen are making themselves popular by telling Scotland how opposed they are to cheating and that they will take action regardless of the club. The fans will be protesting but against a media who have largely also decided on guilt, then they stand alone.

That was very nearly our world and that should shame Scottish football.

[Band of Brothers 10,303]

guy on snyde going for it!

[Botto 1690 3]

After all the fuss and acres of trees felled to supply the insatiable lust to see Rangers punished for actions they did not do, the Scottish Premier League Commission under Lord Nimmo-Smith clearly points out that Rangers did not cheat and did not gain any competitive advantage for having Employee Benefit Trusts.

- Rangers retain titles following probe

It was a verdict that Rangers and the fans were endlessly repeating before it happened, but no-one wanted to listen. In this case it was guilt before innocence that seemed to spread uncontrollably until there were few who did not believe their fictional stories were fact. Daily newspapers told us how much the club had cheated since 2000 and wondered how many titles would be taken - not if they should be taken. Yes, it actually went that far.

But worse, the Scottish Premier League and Scottish Football Association, the noble guardians of the game, had decided in the summer to take titles and cups from Rangers without any due process. In no other sport in the world would the governing bodies openly suggest taking away hard won achievement because they assumed the worst, rather than wait for small things like evidence.

This in itself shows the feeding frenzy that Scotland had at the time. If Charles Green had not refused the title stripping deal (imagine if he had been some anonymous businessman from elsewhere who did not care?) then the Light Blues would have lost those wins.

But jaws have dropped and excuses are now being made. They had no evidence of cheating. Rangers did nothing wrong on the park or in trying to gain an unfair sporting advantage. It's Rangers and especially the fans, who are victims of Craig Whyte and his treatment of the club, no-one else.

On Thursday Rangers manager Ally McCoist spoke of his delight that "the result of the Commission has totally vindicated the entire club" and his relief that it was over. He pointed out that "to have something like that levelled at you [cheating] is pretty outrageous and I'm thrilled for all the fans, for the staff and all the players that a sensible outcome has been reached."

It was typical of a man who has shown incredible strength and dignity through a terrible twelve months and was one of those making it clear to new boy Charles Green that under no circumstances should he accept title-stripping for a place in SFL1. The Rangers CEO has been getting the praise for refusing to do so, and of course that is proper, but let's not forget it was the manager who was making sure the fans were not being sold out.

And although he didn't go into why there was such a whirlwind of innuendo taking the place of facts, others should. Who at the SFA and SPL believed Rangers should be stripped of titles for no reason and why? Why did the SPL wait until Rangers were in administration to set up a commission they could have done at any time in a decade? Who made those decisions and why? Who were the people who had decided Rangers' guilt by gossip and who were willing to go to incredible lengths to damage the club? If the right people ask these questions and demand answers then all will be revealed.

Yet, as bad as 2012 was for the Rangers it could have been worse. If some physicists and cosmologists are correct and there really are parallel universes that are created after every decision we make, then in one there is a Rangers Football Club that is totally destroyed, with titles stripped from the SFA and SPL, while those officials and club Chairmen are making themselves popular by telling Scotland how opposed they are to cheating and that they will take action regardless of the club. The fans will be protesting but against a media who have largely also decided on guilt, then they stand alone.

That was very nearly our world and that should shame Scottish football.

[Gaffbear 4,104]

Fuckin begging bastards . . canny shut up about us. I hope we leave this Fuckin back water and never play these cunts again. . Fuckin raging.

[Rangers Lady 2,380]

Maybe you are right but it's important that any response doesn't become a tit for tat with opinions....we should just present the facts and let him dig his on hole....if they are publishing views on this on their official site then that Is different because if there is any suggestion of wrongdoing they leave themselves open to libel!

Just needs a Charlie one liner hopefully

[wearethepeople1 3,897]

stinking manky bastards, so much for not talking about us eh?

bitter disgusting people

[OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475]

Aye alright Botto we get it

[harlands plater 17,065]

Why would we even dignify that? Lets be better than that. The only thing worse than being about, is not being talked about, as a wise sage once said

Aye, that approach really worked for years.

[Stranraer No7 20]

Yellow teeth can't help himself. He has verbal diahorrea! It's so pleasing to be getting a rise from the wee prick.

[GazTheBear 23]

They say they are "SURPRISED" at the decision made,now that's NO SURPRISE

[Botto 1690 3]

F me double post sorry bears

Repeating myself like that wee bheasty

Lemmon

[Botto 1690 3]

F me treble post

Sorry acting like a tim

On the sauce troops

WRTP

[MisterC 12,444]

Aye, that approach really worked for years.

Fair point, bud, cant argue with that. I just hope theres a nice short, sharp, withering riposte from the club if any statement is made.

[norniron1992 61]

Bitter as fuck going by his press conference today.