Mark Walters 206 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 McCoist saved the club when he gave Green his backing far more than Green ever did. Without his say so ST's wouldn't have been bought in numbers.Did he? How did he go about that exactly? by clapping the fans during a rendition if you 'hate Stewart Regan clap your hands?' this was after we were landed in the 3rd division, something green was desperate to avoid and that included having 5 titles wiped from the history books. again McCoist was the key figure who under no circumstances would agree to that.This is another myth, how did he go about defending the fans? there's no evidence of this. If anything his comical statements after Berwick were more painfully out of touch as any previous regime.We're Rangers, we have one of the biggest fan bases on the planet. Sponsorship was inevitable no matter where we played. and believe it or not our sponsors are still shared with that lot across the city who tried to bury usAgain, we're Rangers. We're an investable product especially after debts are wiped and our only route is upwards. Who's to say he might have underachieved.Murray often piled on empty rhetoric of the promised land. it was of course all bullshit.He's a snake oil salesman whose happy to meet his shaftees until the truth outs at which point he's retreated abroad with his share.Again, snake oil salesmen know how to play the gallery. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 W The article posted earlier states clearly that non exec directors are behind some of the strangest ideas weve heard to date like Bains return. That and the leaks from "very senior sources" ill advised comments to the press seem to indicate the involvement of both, and regardless of past achievement's they must both be judged on taking the club forward, Bain and Murray cash lite are not such steps.a rumours !! lets react to rumours and blame the board! what do you want - every one on the board reacting as one - like in the Murray era? like in the Whyte time? is that how you see us - or do you want people who think for themselves? and act in a collective interest for the club? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertent 2,081 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 .Again, snake oil salesmen know how to play the gallery.As a vocal supporter of the liar and charlatan Murray Cash Lite ill accept your 1st hand knowledge of such things Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Walters 206 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 As a vocal supporter of the liar and charlatan Murray Cash Lite ill accept your 1st hand knowledge of such thingsCheers guy. That means a lot coming from a Green and Whyte man. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertent 2,081 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 a rumours !! lets react to rumours and blame the board! what do you want - every one on the board reacting as one - like in the Murray era? like in the Whyte time? is that how you see us - or do you want people who think for themselves? and act in a collective interest for the club?Interest of the club or old pals isnt the same in my book. If you have something to say as a director come out and say it, dont feed cryptic stories to the enemies in the press, or for that matter cliques within the support. It can make it look like you have an agenda you want kept secret. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertent 2,081 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Cheers guy. That means a lot coming from a Green and Whyte man.No problem always glad to help those blighted by hard of thinking. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Do you mean the same Walter who would not say a bad word against Murray. . The same one who has delivered all those titles and cups , who despite everything can still think for himself - that's the man you want to blame and have dragged of the board! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 McCoist saved the club when he gave Green his backing far more than Green ever did. Without his say so ST's wouldn't have been bought in numbers.Did he? How did he go about that exactly? by clapping the fans during a rendition if you 'hate Stewart Regan clap your hands?' this was after we were landed in the 3rd division, something green was desperate to avoid and that included having 5 titles wiped from the history books. again McCoist was the key figure who under no circumstances would agree to that.This is another myth, how did he go about defending the fans? there's no evidence of this. If anything his comical statements after Berwick were more painfully out of touch as any previous regime.We're Rangers, we have one of the biggest fan bases on the planet. Sponsorship was inevitable no matter where we played. and believe it or not our sponsors are still shared with that lot across the city who tried to bury usAgain, we're Rangers. We're an investable product especially after debts are wiped and our only route is upwards. Who's to say he might have underachieved.Murray often piled on empty rhetoric of the promised land. it was of course all bullshit.He's a snake oil salesman whose happy to meet his shaftees until the truth outs at which point he's retreated abroad with his share.Again, snake oil salesmen know how to play the gallery.By much of this logic we can never give any CEO type figure credit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
minstral 5,375 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 .The same one who has delivered all those titles and cups , who despite everything can still think for himself - that's the man you want to blame and have dragged of the board! The same man who last week was singing the praise of Celtic and Lemmon last week in the papers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allanger 625 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 And news reaches us today that the non executive board members are pushing to get Bain reinstalled as ceo.A disgrace Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast 9,476 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 One theory I came up with is that the MM/WS/IA cabal within the boardroom have struck a deal with the SFA/SPL for Rangers to be fast-tracked at least into a SPL2. The price of this was removal of CG.As I said, it's a theory only but I wouldn't say it's too far fetched. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiftyandsamba 7 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Well Dingwalls storm troopers are in the trenches aiming to get their man that blazer by toeing the Murray Cash Lite line.These self anointed welks are really starting to get a bit beyond themselves even by their own inflated ego standardsNo wonder the tims run rings round us when you have So - called rangers supporters coming out with guff like this. Embarrassing , sad and pathetic. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Walters 206 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 No problem always glad to help those blighted by hard of thinking.Cheers guy. your intellectual nous is blinding Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Walters 206 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 By much of this logic we can never give any CEO type figure credit.Certainly not Green by any stretch of the imagination. Its in spite of him, Lawwell, Regan and Doncaster that we still have 54 titles attributed to us. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Certainly not Green by any stretch of the imagination. Its in spite of him, Lawwell, Regan and Doncaster that we still have 54 titles attributed to us.I love how you peddle this myth that Green wanted to give titles up as fact without providing one shred of proof. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Certainly not Green by any stretch of the imagination. Its in spite of him, Lawwell, Regan and Doncaster that we still have 54 titles attributed to us. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Walters 206 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 I love how you peddle this myth that Green wanted to give titles up as fact without providing one shred of proof.You just don't like uncomfortable truths. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertent 2,081 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Cheers guy. your intellectual nous is blinding Well it would explain your inability to see the truth. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
delamonty 992 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 The point is.. Green has done a lot of good for this club. Bringing Walter back was sensible (no one else alive on the planet today knows more than how to make The Rangers win than him). Aye a few quotes gone astray and very unRangers-like... but he is who he is.I hope he changes his mind and returns after the investigation is done. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertent 2,081 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 You just don't like uncomfortable truths.I dont like uncomfortable undergarments Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 You just don't like uncomfortable truths.Nah, i just can't be arsed with evidence lacking statements. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allanger 625 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 If Bain returns Smith and McCoist have a lot to answer. Jobs for the boys Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Walters 206 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 I dont like uncomfortable undergarmentsits worth it though to look and feel so sexually empowering. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Walters 206 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Nah, i just can't be arsed with evidence lacking statements.And that's fair enough. I can just as easily laugh off any proclamations that he took on the SFA/SPL Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertent 2,081 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 And that's fair enough. I can just as easily laugh off any proclamations that he took on the SFA/SPLwelcome to the internet. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.