Zappa 358 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 the point is that todays statement HAS to be accurate or it leaves them wide open to an attack from MM and his peopleThis statement could be accurate (ie the list of 'facts' could be accurate), while at the same time also being misleeding. In fact, the last paragraph of the statement is definitely misleeding because it is pure spin doctoring.The Board of Rangers Football Club are appalled and saddened at the current demeanour of Mr Malcolm Murray and the damage that he is causing to the Club and regard his behaviour as totally unbefitting a once respected practitioner in the City of London’s financial community.That paragraph is a disgraceful statement to come from the board of our Club, but you see that's the rub... It's not even from our Club. That is almost certainly the fork-tongued, nasty spin work of Toxic Jack Irvine, who's currently being paid handsomely to run smear tactics in an all out effort to try to save the jobs of the guys on our board. It's disgusting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 so that he'll sign off the same wages for the new peopleCan't say that, no documented proof until Charlotte Fakes publishes it, FFS man you know the rules! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 This statement could be accurate (ie the list of 'facts' could be accurate), while at the same time also being misleeding. In fact, the last paragraph of the statement is definitely misleeding because it is pure spin doctoring.That paragraph is a disgraceful statement to come from the board of our Club, but you see that's the rub... It's not even from our Club. That is almost certainly the fork-tongued, nasty spin work of Toxic Jack Irvine, who's currently being paid handsomely to run smear tactics in an all out effort to try to save the jobs of the guys on our board. It's disgusting.Walk on, "The Board of Rangers Football Club are appalled and saddened at the current demeanour of Mr Malcolm Murray and the damage that he is causing to the Club and regard his behaviour as totally unbefitting a once respected practitioner in the City of London’s financial community.", yeah he was once not now I am assuming after this p1sh.Causing damage is bang on target if you ask me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stfu 596 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Most people know exactly what the Board are insinuating by 'appalled and saddened by his current demeanour'. By all means challenge his various assertions, but dishing out personal insults is not the Rangers way.Behaving like MM and Mini and his cohorts have been is certainly not "The Rangers way".Some of us know exactly what has gone on in some of the meetings that were held last year and MM was an utter embarrassment to the club.Ask the football authorities what they thought of his speech last year.Ask the rest of the board what they thought of his constant leaks.Then ask yourself, is this good enough for the Chairman of Rangers?Most of us are not stupid we know that the current board are not perfect.But they are a hell of a lot better than the other joke option.No plan, no money, no shares.To do what these rebels are doing is harmful to the club they claim to love. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1NachoNovo 840 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 This whole thing is becoming ridiculous now.As said in an earlier post, it's like one camp hates The Rangers now. It's all out civil war!We are ALL supposed to be the people, not just half of us. Stop squabbling like a bunch of kids and do what is right for the club.If you can't bring yourself to put the club first, then shut up and bugger off, please! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shankillblue1 349 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Can't agree that this release is petty.It pretty much maintains/increases the credibility of the current board, with M. Murray left naked. His integrity is now ell fucked. As for mini, he never had any anyhow.The big salaries/bonuses agreed and paid under the watch of M. Murray and Green. The one off big payments under the watch of M. Murray and Green.Let's be honest, there isn't much that you can lay blame to current board.Time the ''requisitioners'' done wan, never to be seen again and let their be an end to this sorry petulant saga that is damaging our great club no end. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steelee66 233 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 This statement could be accurate (ie the list of 'facts' could be accurate), while at the same time also being misleeding. In fact, the last paragraph of the statement is definitely misleeding because it is pure spin doctoring.That paragraph is a disgraceful statement to come from the board of our Club, but you see that's the rub... It's not even from our Club. That is almost certainly the fork-tongued, nasty spin work of Toxic Jack Irvine, who's currently being paid handsomely to run smear tactics in an all out effort to try to save the jobs of the guys on our board. It's disgusting.How can any Rangers fan find that statement disgusting?Factual and straight to the point.Regardless of what other statements the board have or haven't made, this one was bang on the money.You're embarrassing yourself with your desperation. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shankillblue1 349 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 This statement could be accurate (ie the list of 'facts' could be accurate), while at the same time also being misleeding. In fact, the last paragraph of the statement is definitely misleeding because it is pure spin doctoring.That paragraph is a disgraceful statement to come from the board of our Club, but you see that's the rub... It's not even from our Club. That is almost certainly the fork-tongued, nasty spin work of Toxic Jack Irvine, who's currently being paid handsomely to run smear tactics in an all out effort to try to save the jobs of the guys on our board. It's disgusting.Bottom line fact is fact and don't dish out shit if you ain't prepared or man enough to get some back. Minico have been relentless in pursuit of nothing other than a self serving agenda and seriously damaged the image of our great club in doing so, giving the mhedia a feeding frenzy! Spin? Yes, minico have been masters at it and a disgrace! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 It is apparent agendas are forcing the indefensible to be defended, mm is a disgrace end of. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Behaving like MM and Mini and his cohorts have been is certainly not "The Rangers way".Some of us know exactly what has gone on in some of the meetings that were held last year and MM was an utter embarrassment to the club.Ask the football authorities what they thought of his speech last year.Ask the rest of the board what they thought of his constant leaks.Then ask yourself, is this good enough for the Chairman of Rangers?Most of us are not stupid we know that the current board are not perfect.But they are a hell of a lot better than the other joke option.No plan, no money, no shares.To do what these rebels are doing is harmful to the club they claim to love.Nah man, we should go to "wing it" with a new untested board and get back to the "keep it indoors" mentality, you know the sort of sh1t that stopped the TBB and allowed SF to get into power in NI, lets not rock the boat by defending ourselves.Outrageous to think we might speak out or defend ourselves, who do we htink we are?i am pure dead mental about this statement and where it will lead......Edit: I don't pull the claws from my cats paws as I want them to have the ability to fight when needed, even if they do sometimes p1ss me off by clawing the couch. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,978 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 This statement could be accurate (ie the list of 'facts' could be accurate), while at the same time also being misleeding. In fact, the last paragraph of the statement is definitely misleeding because it is pure spin doctoring.That paragraph is a disgraceful statement to come from the board of our Club, but you see that's the rub... It's not even from our Club. That is almost certainly the fork-tongued, nasty spin work of Toxic Jack Irvine, who's currently being paid handsomely to run smear tactics in an all out effort to try to save the jobs of the guys on our board. It's disgusting.the last paragraph is clearly an opinion and not listed as facts Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Atheist 178 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Good statement.Back the board! Sack the bloggers! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Good statement.Back the board! Sack the bloggers! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RancidCutlass 190 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Is "current demeanour" polite for jakey bastard? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast 9,264 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 The Board have got it wrong here. MM was obviously talking about his appointment to the Board of RIFC and not his previous appointment to Sevco Scotland and then RFC. He was on that Board with CG, IA and BS so would be outvoted at every stage.One good thing from all of this is that your pathetic organisation is getting more and more marginalised.This could be the final wrong horse that you've backed that kills you off for good. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 It is apparent agendas are forcing the indefensible to be defended, mm is a disgrace end of.So are you. At least he's a Bear.Reply:Something about grass... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 So are you. At least he's a Bear.Reply:Something about grass...At least you know you are a grass if nothing else, so not all bad. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dutchy 1,200 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Crickey! I managed 4 pages of this thread before giving up as all the usual arguing has raised it's ugly head again. What do you say about these board wars that anyone involved in them will give a blind bit of notice to? Keith Jackson was on Radio O'Scotland tonite and he certainly knew what to say by slagging Rangers off in general, It's only going to get worse as the AGM approaches and all these journos are going in to feeding frenzy mode. If they're not already fully paid up members. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 One good thing from all of this is that your pathetic organisation is getting more and more marginalised.This could be the final wrong horse that you've backed that kills you off for good.I hope this is correct and have a feeling it is now coming to a head with us all, board and fans.Quite frankly we have had enough! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 358 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 How can any Rangers fan find that statement disgusting?The last paragraph is a disgusting way for the board (on behalf of the Club!) to speak about the former Chairman & Director in an official statement, but as I've said already, it was almost certainly written by Jack Irvine and not the board themselves. They will probably have approved it though.They should keep their petty slanging matches to private correspondance.It's also extremely hypocritical of them to use the word "unbefitting" to describe others when their own actions are unbefitting of directors on the board of Rangers Football Club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,978 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 They should keep their petty slanging matches to private correspondance.they tried that, someone with an agenda against the board just leaked the private correspondance Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 The last paragraph is a disgusting way for the board (on behalf of the Club!) to speak about the former Chairman & Director in an official statement, but as I've said already, it was almost certainly written by Jack Irvine and not the board themselves. They will probably have approved it though.They should keep their petty slanging matches to private correspondance.It's also extremely hypocritical of them to use the word "unbefitting" to describe others when their own actions are unbefitting of directors on the board of Rangers Football Club. Beelin' Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 358 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 the last paragraph is clearly an opinion and not listed as factsYes and it's also an embarrassment 'unbefitting' of the board of our Club. They're wasting god knows how much cash paying multiple law firms to scuttle around threatening fans and fans' forums based on 'defamtion' laws, then the turn around and start bordering on breaching defamation laws themselves in official statements? They're a fucking joke and a total embarrassment to our club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 The last paragraph is a disgusting way for the board (on behalf of the Club!) to speak about the former Chairman & Director in an official statement, but as I've said already, it was almost certainly written by Jack Irvine and not the board themselves. They will probably have approved it though.They should keep their petty slanging matches to private correspondance.It's also extremely hypocritical of them to use the word "unbefitting" to describe others when their own actions are unbefitting of directors on the board of Rangers Football Club. Almost certian, maybe, got a feeling,Got anything to say that has any ring of truth or not bothering about that? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 358 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 they tried that, someone with an agenda against the board just leaked the private correspondanceI'm sure the men on our Club's board, their PR rats and their legal eagles all have Malcolm Murray's various telephone numbers for direct communication if other methods can't be trusted. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.