cushynumber 25,178 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 I wasn't aware it was from CF, as personally I don't frequent bheast websites/blogs.As stated earlier I thoiught I had read it on here and supplied links to both Gersnet and DTB forums.Personally, do you believe e-mail is genuine and that McCoist asked his agent to 'hide' his salary from us?just read my posts in that topic - its clear I think the letter is a sham. I dont frequent bheast sites either, I read it on here - where it quite clearly states the CF link. Aside from that specific letter, I dont see how - as a public company that has to release accounts every year (at least) ,and a support that is all over the board with regards their every move - Ally can hide anything regarding increases or decreases to his salaryYou obviously believe it though- yes? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wullyRFC 5,230 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Used to get bombers on my joggies when I was younger Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky True Legend 2,682 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 And still some want fan ownership! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather 72,635 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Fan ownership is just a pipe dream for some. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandyinroyalblue 16,478 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 question ally on the job he's doing on the park by all means but ffs keep it dignified Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Reynolds 3,359 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 I have no idea what 'they' call him, although surely any reference to a paedo-related charity would be seen as a badge of honour by those cunts?And so you deem it appropriate to give him a moniker which is in reference to a paedo-related charity? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 McCoist is unsackable at the moment, he's unbeaten in the league and still in a cup. And more to the boards reasoning - there are season tickets to be sold, someone has to be paraded in front of the cameras to get us buying and they deem it to be the very man who's giving us shite football in return for our cash. The board would probably like to change the motto of our club to be "Mo' Money, Mo' Money, Mo Money"McCoist was born unsackable, sadly Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 And so you deem it appropriate to give him a moniker which is in reference to a paedo-related charity?One he happily fronts and promotes Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
familystandloyal 131 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 One he happily fronts and promotesJust to be clear, is mentioning SCIAF allowed and the promotional work our manager does for them?Is it just the moniker I used for him, related to the above point, that isn't?is any 'personal' criticism allowed of McCoist or does it all have to be based on his competence, or not, in his current post? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
familystandloyal 131 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 just read my posts in that topic - its clear I think the letter is a sham. I dont frequent bheast sites either, I read it on here - where it quite clearly states the CF link. Aside from that specific letter, I dont see how - as a public company that has to release accounts every year (at least) ,and a support that is all over the board with regards their every move - Ally can hide anything regarding increases or decreases to his salaryYou obviously believe it though- yes?To answer your points in turn...As per an earlier post I was not aware of the CF links, maybe I didn't read the original e-mails in this forum or that particular thread?I use more than one Rangers forum and posted links to the e-mail on both CTB and Gersnet.Whilst a puiblic company should release accounts at least yearly, would that include detailed specific salary information for individual employees? From memory, i don't tremember seeing such detail in previous accounts I have receieved from club, althoug these were post-admin? The subtle difference being that as far as I am aware, an IPO document must include detailed information on the highest individual earners within the company. So, in theory any employee could request a deferrment of wages pre-IPO enabling a reduced 'false' figure to be reported within the IPO document and their wages would revert to the original level, including any deferrments after IPO document was published. I assume the main reason any employee would request such an action would be to 'hide' his true salary for some reason.Yes, I do believe the letter is genuine and for the record I also believe that he may well not have been the only individual to make such a request i.e. to hide their true salary from the fans.As an aside, when McCoist was earning £800k+ per annum was he the highest paid employee at the club?Did anyone find a link to what Michael laudrup was on at Swansea? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
familystandloyal 131 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 And so you deem it appropriate to give him a moniker which is in reference to a paedo-related charity?Your are kind of making my point here mate.I will obviously NOT use my previous moniker related to the charity for Ally again BUT....SCIAF is imho a sectarian charity with direct links to a medieval voodoo cult which has this very week been slaughtered by the UN for basically being a paedophile ring and refusing to hand the paedos over to the appropriate authorities.Personally, anyone who associates themselves with such a 'charity' should be reminded of such facts, as I did recently to the wee torn faced cow who came into my work collecting for her 'wee box' for the black babies and when questioned by a naive colleague what SCIAF stood for blatantly lied that the 'C' stood for Christian!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather 72,635 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Making up names like that and McSalary is hardly going to get people to listen to you on this site is it?Use your head for goodness sake. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
familystandloyal 131 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Making up names like that and McSalary is hardly going to get people to listen to you on this site is it?Use your head for goodness sake.It's been quite a few pages/posts since any moniker has been used, I have now as advised/requested used McCoist or Ally.You make a good point though, as yet again you like many others before you ignore relevant, pertinent points I have raised and focus instead on the names issue. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
laudrupno1 3,932 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 I've stated previously on here that I believe McSalary is now 'working his ticket' and attempting to be sacked. Various things he has done/said over the past few weeks & months would be sackable offences at most companies and following his WDDWA statement his only way out is being booted.I know his wages have now finally been cut, BUT if they club thought he was worth £800k+/annum and believed that wage WAS affordable would Michael Laudrup be totally out of the question? I'm pretty certain I read somewher that he was/is on less than McSciaf, and I'm surely his brother would have nothing but good things to say about his time at Ibrox.Either way, we should be aiming a lot higher than Bomber Brown, although in his defence he would probably do a better job than our current management team.Cringe. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Anyone thimk this will happen? With Brown leaving Dundeed today and rumours that McCoist isnt flavour of the month with some of the directors its enough to make you think. Personally I would be against this for a whole host of reasons but given the events of recent times we cannot rule out anything.To answer the OP.....NO. Brown won't replace him.That said, I believe it would be better for the club if he were replaced.Legend on the pitch.....does a lorra-lorra work for charridee.............but this gig isn't working out. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
familystandloyal 131 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Cringe.You are about 24 hours, 4 pages and countless posts too late, try to keep up.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
laudrupno1 3,932 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 You are about 24 hours, 4 pages and countless posts too late, try to keep up.... Just read it so fuck up Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
familystandloyal 131 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Just read it so fuck up Thanks for your eloquent input, much appreciated.What exactly do you mean by 'fuck up'?Just to be clear? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
laudrupno1 3,932 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Thanks for your eloquent input, much appreciated.What exactly do you mean by 'fuck up'?Just to be clear?Coming from the guy who calls our manager McSalary and McSciaf jog on Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
familystandloyal 131 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Coming from the guy who calls our manager McSalary and McSciaf jog on Again, another poster concentrating on the names issue as opposed to actually addressing any relevant points/issues raised within the thread.In hindsight, it has probably helped Ally by using the monikers and allowing the focus to be taken off the real issue of his comptence, or not, in his current position Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
laudrupno1 3,932 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Again, another poster concentrating on the names issue as opposed to actually addressing any relevant points/issues raised within the thread.In hindsight, it has probably helped Ally by using the monikers and allowing the focus to be taken off the real issue of his comptence, or not, in his current positionMaybe if you stopped calling our manager the petty names Id have more time for you and your points. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
familystandloyal 131 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Maybe if you stopped calling our manager the petty names Id have more time for you and your points.And again, any relevant/pertinent points and issues raised are ignored and not addressed, instead the names issue is used to deflect. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cushynumber 25,178 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 To answer your points in turn...As per an earlier post I was not aware of the CF links, maybe I didn't read the original e-mails in this forum or that particular thread?I use more than one Rangers forum and posted links to the e-mail on both CTB and Gersnet.Whilst a puiblic company should release accounts at least yearly, would that include detailed specific salary information for individual employees? From memory, i don't tremember seeing such detail in previous accounts I have receieved from club, althoug these were post-admin? The subtle difference being that as far as I am aware, an IPO document must include detailed information on the highest individual earners within the company. So, in theory any employee could request a deferrment of wages pre-IPO enabling a reduced 'false' figure to be reported within the IPO document and their wages would revert to the original level, including any deferrments after IPO document was published. I assume the main reason any employee would request such an action would be to 'hide' his true salary for some reason.Yes, I do believe the letter is genuine and for the record I also believe that he may well not have been the only individual to make such a request i.e. to hide their true salary from the fans.As an aside, when McCoist was earning £800k+ per annum was he the highest paid employee at the club?Did anyone find a link to what Michael laudrup was on at Swansea?some of your points are pertinent, but based on the premise that the letter is real not a fake - regardless of where you first read it. That is where we differ. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
familystandloyal 131 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 some of your points are pertinent, but based on the premise that the letter is real not a fake - regardless of where you first read it. That is where we differ.Whether you think the letter was genuine or not we can at least agree that McCoist's salary of £800+k per annum, which is the highest in the country and more than many English premiership managers, is ridiculous.Do we also agree that McCoist never worked for free during admin or took any pay cut at all i.e. all wages not paid at the time were deferred and paid back later? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
familystandloyal 131 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 And btw when getting paid £800k+ per annum was he the highest paid individual at the club? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.df745cc91b83abab0590131961ba2774.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.