.Williamson. 83,874 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Just now, danger ranger said: You really like this thread don't you. Tbh I have found it hard to post in the bears den since Wednesday. Completely deflatedĀ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1NachoNovo 840 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 We keep getting battered in the midfield. 442 will give us an extra man in the midfield and 2 strikers in the box. We will still have 4 defenders (ok, that won't change), but 4 in midfield will give us more presence and might get the ball forward more often, creating chances for 2 forwards in the box, as opposed to one. I'm no tactician, but that sounds like an obvious answer, to a glaringly obvious problem. To beat the opposition, you have to at the very least, match them. As soon as we lose possession, the opposition is all over us, because we have fuck all in midfield and the defence just panics. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 25 minutes ago, Lewdbear72 said: Garner up with dodoo or miller as a 2 in an ideal world My thoughts exactly, though we need to change formation.Ā I actually think with two up top a partnership of Dodoo and Garner could become very effective and have a good few years with it. I can understand what MW is trying to do with the style of football etc, but it just ain't working week in week out in Scottish Football to me it is starting to look a PLG situation all over again, we could possibly play pretty well in European competitions but it just isn't as effective in our league. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
danger ranger 922 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 1 minute ago, .Williamson. said: Tbh I have found it hard to post in the bears den since Wednesday. Completely deflatedĀ Your not far wrong tho, Millers legs are gone and badly in need of a saga holiday, Waghorn is pure pish and Garner isn't the man for 4-3-3. It isn't going to work whatever Warburton plays, it will be more of the same shite. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
5*RFC 166 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 5 minutes ago, bigsasasfloopyhair said: Garner and Waghorn in a 2. Wes Hodson Hill Wilson Wallace Tav Halliday Holt McKay Waggy Garner That frontlineĀ has clusterfuck written all over it. They won't pass to each other and will get in each other's way. McKay will be brushed off the ball often and won't put any decent crosses in. Think the rest is quite good actually. Got to try something different. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
danger ranger 922 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 4 minutes ago, 1NachoNovo said: We keep getting battered in the midfield. 442 will give us an extra man in the midfield and 2 strikers in the box. We will still have 4 defenders (ok, that won't change), but 4 in midfield will give us more presence and might get the ball forward more often, creating chances for 2 forwards in the box, as opposed to one. I'm no tactician, but that sounds like an obvious answer, to a glaringly obvious problem. To beat the opposition, you have to at the very least, match them. As soon as we lose possession, the opposition is all over us, because we have fuck all in midfield and the defence just panics. He tried that against the scum in the semi-final, and got carved up like a kipper, the man is out of his depth. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
plumbGER 24,518 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 35 minutes ago, RFCJoshy1690 said: You never know we could play a blinder tomorrow Ā Ā *no laughing at the back* Fenian patter Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazza1212 1,212 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 No matter who plays we should be getting right behind them and do our bit to try and lift this club out the mire. These cunts fkn hate rangers with a passion.Ā I worked up that shithole for 5 years and know this to be true. The team shouldn't need any motivation other than the privilege of pulling on that blue Jersey butĀ If we can lift them even a tiny bit then ffs let's do it tomorrow. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFCJoshy1690 72 Posted December 2, 2016 Author Share Posted December 2, 2016 3 minutes ago, plumbGER said: Fenian patter Christ here we go ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
plumbGER 24,518 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 4 minutes ago, RFCJoshy1690 said: Christ here we go ? No denial, very taigish. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronniescu 2,991 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 51 minutes ago, El-Hadji Spit RFC said: Fuckin better aff wi Hillary Clinton Better with JAMES Garner. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cd true bluenose 86 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 10 minutes ago, danger ranger said: He tried that against the scum in the semi-final, and got carved up like a kipper, the man is out of his depth. 4 1 3 2 for me with hodsonĀ at right backĀ tav is crap at defending and in this league not that great going forward ? hence why wee got the wigan boys so cheapĀ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1NachoNovo 840 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 14 minutes ago, danger ranger said: He tried that against the scum in the semi-final, and got carved up like a kipper, the man is out of his depth. He gets carved up like a kipper week in week out. But to be fair, we'll learn from it. As long as we keep training well and using the squad, then we'll be fine. The one problem I have with that is, fuck using the squad. If they aren't earning a starting place, then that's their problem. It's a managers job to play the best team at all times, not poor wee whoever beause it's his turn. If they ain't good enough, then they can do one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFCJoshy1690 72 Posted December 2, 2016 Author Share Posted December 2, 2016 1 minute ago, 1NachoNovo said: He gets carved up like a kipper week in week out. But to be fair, we'll learn from it. As long as we keep training well and using the squad, then we'll be fine. The one problem I have with that is, fuck using the squad. If they aren't earning a starting place, then that's their problem. It's a managers job to play the best team at all times, not poor wee whoever beause it's his turn. If they ain't good enough, then they can do one. If we work on the geography and get the loading right we'll be in a good placeĀ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1NachoNovo 840 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Just now, RFCJoshy1690 said: If we work on the geography and get the loading right we'll be in a good placeĀ If you were capable of getting your geography right, you would be on a different forum. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFCJoshy1690 72 Posted December 2, 2016 Author Share Posted December 2, 2016 1 minute ago, 1NachoNovo said: If you were capable of getting your geography right, you would be on a different forum. Aye ok mateĀ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1NachoNovo 840 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Just now, RFCJoshy1690 said: Aye ok mateĀ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFCJoshy1690 72 Posted December 2, 2016 Author Share Posted December 2, 2016 1 minute ago, 1NachoNovo said: ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyļ»æArse 54,319 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Garner should be the first name on team sheet. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-Hadji Spit RFC 733 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 First name on the team sheet should be.... em....Ā Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsasasfloppyhair 13,310 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 34 minutes ago, 5*RFC said: That frontlineĀ has clusterfuck written all over it. They won't pass to each other and will get in each other's way. McKay will be brushed off the ball often and won't put any decent crosses in. Think the rest is quite good actually. Got to try something different. Our team has clusterfuck written over it but need to field eleven players!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BILLYBOY50 1,638 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 can someone explain to me why we can't change from a 433 and still retain possesion of the ballĀ but move the ball quicker press higher and for fuck sake have some shots on goal.i can't wait to see the players reacting to that inexcusable defeat midweek and at least if they put in a similar performance with the same outcome after all their post match talk then we will know what they are made ofĀ cmon rangers prove us all wrong. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFCJoshy1690 72 Posted December 3, 2016 Author Share Posted December 3, 2016 12 minutes ago, BILLYBOY50 said: can someone explain to me why we can't change from a 433 and still retain possesion of the ballĀ but move the ball quicker press higher and for fuck sake have some shots on goal.i can't wait to see the players reacting to that inexcusable defeat midweek and at least if they put in a similar performance with the same outcome after all their post match talk then we will know what they are made ofĀ cmon rangers prove us all wrong. There isn't a reason (well not that I can explain), watching us a play a 433 I actually dont can't see the strengths that's it's meant to deliver it just seems like a complete dud of a formationĀ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,312 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Our front 3 will destroy them tomorrow. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFCJoshy1690 72 Posted December 3, 2016 Author Share Posted December 3, 2016 5 minutes ago, Big Al II said: Our front 3 will destroy them tomorrow. Hope so. I really want tae beat they fuckers and hearĀ them bubbling and throwing a tantrum. Then to see it continue onto theĀ social media world. It will be glorious. Cmon the gers WATP ?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.