Jump to content

King at BBC today


backup

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 206
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

On 28/01/2018 at 10:36, B1872 said:

Richard Gordon is the cunts cunt as well. He’s be the first I’d tell the BBC to get rid of. Specky hotdog!

I wonder if we could get your avatar made up as a card display for the next old firm game? Just so we can show our support for our Turkish friends. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 28/01/2018 at 10:36, B1872 said:

Richard Gordon is the cunts cunt as well. He’s be the first I’d tell the BBC to get rid of. Specky hotdog!

 

Richard Gordon is a sniveling wee rat and every time we gub Aberdeen I listen to Sportsound to listen to the sheep shagging inbred mourne and make up excuses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, They Gnu said:

Get out of the echo chamber your in and you’ll find the vast majority, though not 100% happy, back King and the Three Bears. 

Quite possibly because the vast majority have had the wool pulled over their eyes regarding King. There's not many Bears that I socialise with who back him.

As an aside, anything to say on his failed promises and lies....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, They Gnu said:

Get out of the echo chamber your in and you’ll find the vast majority, though not 100% happy, back King and the Three Bears. 

Most Bears I've spoken to are rather apathetic towards him to be fair, but are quite pissed off he hasn't stuck to his promises he made before he got control. That's the way I see it. But to say most back him is wrong. Most ( I've spoken to ) want someone else in charge, but don't know who. And that is my feelings towards the situation too. 

We should see if that bird that's trying to buy Newcastle is interested? Only if she has the funds and is willing to put them in though. I admit to not knowing much about her other than she's looking to buy a football club. So a bit more digging to find out why she wants to buy a football club would need to be done first obviously. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Virtuoso said:

Quite possibly because the vast majority have had the wool pulled over their eyes regarding King. There's not many Bears that I socialise with who back him.

As an aside, anything to say on his failed promises and lies....

Tbf that's the exact definition of an echo chamber. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Leeds_Bear said:

Tbf that's the exact definition of an echo chamber. 

No it's not. The previous quote and use of echo chamber was relating to the previous assumption made by Deanz that the majority of Bears back King, he made that assumption without any proof.

I'm basing my claim on personal conversations with people I know and socialise with and the majority don't back King.

Big difference between the two.

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Redwhiteandblue said:

Also, @They Gnu it appears you are a poster who normally posts on Follow Follow? Would I be right in saying that? 

As almost all on there do follow follow Mark Dingwalls lead who (shock horror) backs King from fear of getting banned. 

Why would anyone fear being banned?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They did a poll on FF recently where the vast majority of posters didn't back the board they thanked them for getting rid of the other board but thought after that they have been a shambles. 

I think we need professionals throughout our club to move forward not gifted contracts and jobs for the boys. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@They Gnu Maybe you would like to start with defending King and the current board against the following failures:

From @K.A.I

Quote

 

I'll give you my own list ..

King is a criminal.
King is a liar.
Still no statement on the campaign by celtic and SPFL to reignite the title stripping campaign after the EBT tax ruling appeals.
King trying to get on the creditors list for his 20-million back when we were in administration then coming out publically and encouraging them to knock back the CVA we had in - that's unforgivable.
Paul Murray doesn't have a penny to his name.
They were all a concert party involved in a hostile takeover having their goons organise protests and boycotts to drive the share price down at the clubs expense.
Dave King failing to show up for the traditional tribute for the 66 dead in the disaster.
They hung the fans out to dry for the Scottish Cup final.
They've zero ambition.
They are bridge-building bastards.
King has said on record ideally he wants to share titles with celtic for the good of Scottish football.
They have secured little investment from the outside.
They don't have the finances to get us competing. 
Their decisions constantly baffle me such as the director of football but if that wasn't bad enough doing it arse over elbow and getting one in after appointing a manager.
Giving Warburton too long to the detriment of our team.
Appointing Pedro in the first place.
6-weeks and counting and we are still no closer to appointing Pedro's replacement.
Ibrox still hasn't had any substantial cleaning/repairs or upkeep done to it.
Joke statements put out on the official website that are embarrassing. 
Failing to persuade McInnes' a lifelong Rangers fan and ex-player to take the position of manager after initial talks.
Failing to defend the club.
Allowing Motherwell and Hibs and Hearts to bully us with reduced ticketing allocations.
Unwilling to even consider giving the fenians a reduced allocation or the very least look into and explore our options.
Still no NOMAD/stock exchange listing.
Promising transparency with fuck-all transparency forthcoming.
A manifesto pledge that no Rangers director will be involved in any business contracts with Rangers FC - couple of weeks later Park's have the coach contract.
Giving Chris Graham, John Brown and Craig Houston jobs in an official capacity to reward them for their help in the boycott's, protests and hostile takeover (albiet Graham fucked it for himself)
I've also heard from a few sources now that Dave King is impossible to get a hold off - sometimes the others can't get a hold of him for a week at a time while he's across in Africa. 

There's a lot, lot more. I'll edit and update as they cross my mind.

They are fucking scum. Parasites. Incompetents. Runts. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Virtuoso said:

No it's not. The previous quote and use of echo chamber was relating to the previous assumption made by Deanz that the majority of Bears back King, he made that assumption without any proof.

I'm basing my claim on personal conversations with people I know and socialise with and the majority don't back King.

Big difference between the two.

I’m not arguing  your opinion on King mate, you’re entitled to it - but if you only take opinions which reinforce your own  then that’s an echo chamber. Was only pointing that out. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Virtuoso said:

@They Gnu Maybe you would like to start with defending King and the current board against the following failures:

From @K.A.I

 

And getting 4 loans in and buying a player from Hamilton bulk of the loans wages probably coming from the money saved from Pena wages and Wilson’s money doesn’t change that no matter how many bi polar Bears there are or FF invasions trying to make us believe so either 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Smile said:

They did a poll on FF recently where the vast majority of posters didn't back the board they thanked them for getting rid of the other board but thought after that they have been a shambles. 

I think we need professionals throughout our club to move forward not gifted contracts and jobs for the boys. 

I agree with this. Board have done good things, but in comparison to the old board it wouldn’t be hard to do that.

They’ve taken the Club to a basic level of operations, if we’re to push on we need to get more people like Mark Allen and Craig Mulholland around the club. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, K.A.I said:

And getting 4 loans in and buying a player from Hamilton bulk of the loans wages probably coming from the money saved from Pena wages and Wilson’s money doesn’t change that no matter how many bi polar Bears there are or FF invasions trying to make us believe so either 

I think you can look at that particular point different ways though.

Yes we’re not spending money but two of the loans have a guarantee to buy, if we want it, if Murty isn’t permenant manager for next season then we want our new manager to have felxibility with what he does with his squad.

Obviously the manager situation is a whole different conversation/clusterfuck  entirely! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found

×
×
  • Create New...