Jump to content

C*ltc


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

So much debate whether it’s a red or not ,people are going to debate this until the next match 

What cannot be denied by anybody is that once again these bastards have had yet another major debatable decision go their way ,It effectively handed them the game ,The sheep were average at best on Saturday but this contentious decision effectively handed them the points as it killed off any real chance of an Aberdeen equaliser 

But never mind in the fucked up brain of the taig they will get a dodgy decision go against them at some point when they are 3  nil up that will cancel this one out 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, magic8ball said:

So much debate whether it’s a red or not ,people are going to debate this until the next match 

What cannot be denied by anybody is that once again these bastards have had yet another major debatable decision go their way ,It effectively handed them the game ,The sheep were average at best on Saturday but this contentious decision effectively handed them the points as it killed off any real chance of an Aberdeen equaliser 

But never mind in the fucked up brain of the taig they will get a dodgy decision go against them at some point when they are 3  nil up that will cancel this one out 

It didnt really 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, magic8ball said:

What cannot be denied by anybody is that once again these bastards have had yet another major debatable decision go their way ,

Spot on! When was the last time celtic had a truely contentious descision against them? Ye know the type that we would have a good chuckle at and say get it up yeez? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, magic8ball said:

So Aberdeen had the same chance of getting an equaliser down to 10 men and their top goal scorer off the pitch then 

It's Aberdeen yer talking about playing the tarriers they were never getting anything out of it whether you think that or not 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AlbertzLoyalRSC said:

Mate you're arguing with a guy that thinks that wee Greta lassie could be the leader of a new world government

Good luck.

:lol:

 

I never said I believed in the NWO ,I just highlighted that by the NWO conspiracy theory somebody like her would be used to unite people across the world ,The NWO is meant to have been thought up over 200 years ago ,but then why would people think of something that they would never be around to benefit from ,Another NWO theory is a fake alien invasion to unite the planet ,but that was meant to happen last year ,’

before you have a pop back it’s actually a good thing to keep an eye on conspiracies,some of them do happen and others like flat earth and NWO are quite amusing to say the least ,

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, magic8ball said:

I never said I believed in the NWO ,I just highlighted that by the NWO conspiracy theory somebody like her would be used to unite people across the world ,The NWO is meant to have been thought up over 200 years ago ,but then why would people think of something that they would never be around to benefit from ,Another NWO theory is a fake alien invasion to unite the planet ,but that was meant to happen last year ,’

before you have a pop back it’s actually a good thing to keep an eye on conspiracies,some of them do happen and others like flat earth and NWO are quite amusing to say the least ,

 

 

So the NWO, is really the OWO  now?

if I was 200 years old I doubt it I'd get away with calling myself NEW. 

or do they call it NWO because it's replacing the OWO?  🙄🙄

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, kelvd1873 said:

Spot on! When was the last time celtic had a truely contentious descision against them? Ye know the type that we would have a good chuckle at and say get it up yeez? 

Jorge Cadete's offside/onside goal at Ibrox must have been 20 years ago prob none since then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pcbear said:

Jorge Cadete's offside/onside goal at Ibrox must have been 20 years ago prob none since then.

The fact that hartson had to go back over a decade to bring up his goal that was chalked off to somehow justify that goal in the LCF tell you everything you need to know mate.

Cunts 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ger4life_1872 said:

Frazer wishart described that as a debatable offside on clyde the other day 😂

The fact a scenario was manufactured with finger has made it debatable 

a bit like me trying to argue white is black ,still makes it debatable ,

But seriously what a fanny ,it’s only up here that it’s become “debatable” heard it getting mentioned a couple of times this week on R5live and talksport where it was brought up  discussion VAR and the presenters laughed at 3 folk offside getting missed 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 03 October 2024 19:00 Until 21:00
      0  
      Rangers v Lyon
      Ibrox Stadium
      UEFA Europa League

×
×
  • Create New...