CooperSF 5,792 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 Yes or No? I thought it was clearly one Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 Referee - Eddie Smith. Says it all! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
minstral 5,375 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 yes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
davie1689 1 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 from the replays on setanta it was deffo a penalty Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 Of course it was - Eddie Smith is a f****n b*stard and got far too many decisions wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie! 8 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 You could clearly see his leg being took away from him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 The tims are starting to moan about how many penalties we're getting, so don't expect many more. And certainly don't expect two in a game, even if they're fully merited. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrshire-loyal 3 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 he was running straight towards me and i was 9 rows from the front stone waller, shocking desision from phil o'donnells uncle Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynn 135 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 Yeah it looked like a penalty from the replays. But the ref didn't see it from that angle so it's hard to say what he saw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxwellrfc 6 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 definately a penalty and he got booked for divin too fs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
beepee 1 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 watching it live on tv i thought it was a dive,then i seen the replay and it was a stonewall penalty,remember the ref cant see replays,how come he didnt book boyd after he went down in the box from the keepers challenge in the first half? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roonaldo 0 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 sure thing, Kirk is an honest player Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the bears ba's 1 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 When I first saw it on Setanta I honestly thought he had dived and I was giving him pelters for not taking a shot. Having seen the replays, he should have definetly had a penalty, his momentum combined with Combe catching him meant he had no option but go down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 definately a penalty and he got booked for divin too fs Can that stupid booking be repealed? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edranger 0 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 Yes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GersDude90 1 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 It doesnt matter if it was difficult for him to see or whatever. The fact is Eddie Smith gets these calls wrong far too often! He's the worst ref i've seen in a while. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
macleod1873 0 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 From where i was sitting i thought it was a stone waller. You could tell by Kirks reaction that he never dived Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FUDGIE52 9 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 Seeing at 1st a didnt think it was but seeing tv. pictures it was, to be fair to the ref he looks at the linesman who doesnt give it, Boyd couldve been booked in the 1st half because he did go down far to easily when he shouldve stayed on his feet and scored. Rangers must appeal the booking because Kirk will get more which may lead to a ban. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazzhowden 0 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 it was a stone waller simple as Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlippinEck 3,734 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 looked like a penalty, i was away in the other stand though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
beepee 1 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 im not sure if you can appeal a yellow card,is it only red cards you can appeal? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,287 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 The scandal was booking him, that should only be done if it was a clear dive which it obviously was not Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShootSpeedKillLight 0 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 It was about 10ft away from me, clearly a penalty even without replays. Awful decision. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeerHunter 0 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 It was a penalty & I didn't even see the geme. Seriously though; twas more a penalty than the one we got, which Krissy missed (had to happen sometime). What about the other stonewaller in the 1st half. Smith, you're a Kaaant (cockney term) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JordanRangers 4 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 Seen the replays on Setanta , aye it was defo a penalty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts