Muff 245 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 I could see him playing at the back against celtc - after all he's quick enough on the ground, strong, great in the air and has a decent enough distribution - well he does if you listen to our manager Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu1993 101 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 POINT IN SMITH MAN :@ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polo 1,435 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 There's really no need to get hot and bothered about this. How does a vague article saying Smith hopes to have both defenders back for the visit of Aberdeen but could turn to McCulloch get interpreted by so many as Smith's going to play McCulloch even if Magic and Weir are fit because they're bum bandits. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 Nothing surprises me anymore. The clique have managed to work their way back into contention. McGregor, McCulloch, Ferguson and Boyd Our club are a joke What have the other 3 got to do with him? They are good players who have contributed to our team in the past and present, McCulloch is just pish and has done virtually nothing for us in the large number of appearances hes made. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayboleLoyal_atb 3,770 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 If this happens Smith's contract should be terminated with immediate effect. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 Pass me the rope, I'm off to hang myself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted November 19, 2008 Author Share Posted November 19, 2008 Well its not definite, but very worrying. Why would you not bring in Whittaker and move Broadfoot or even Papac to CH? Why not play McMillan and give youth a chance. Lee has failed everywhere to date. This is weird. Walter has so many natural CHs why go down this route? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fourfourtwo 2,003 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 "He's quick enough on the ground and is a good user of the ball." Oh, he is? Well that's news to me. He was getting dragged all about the place and looked like a total bombscare in the second half. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,111 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 Well its not definite, but very worrying. Why would you not bring in Whittaker and move Broadfoot or even Papac to CH? Why not play McMillan and give youth a chance. Lee has failed everywhere to date. This is weird. Walter has so many natural CHs why go down this route? because he is a fcukwit that I am now convinced knows nothing about the pace and strength needed in the modern game, i.e. Madjid, donkey Lee seriously give me strength, one - we bought him in the first place, two - we never took the offer in the summer, three - we have a full fecking defensive of centre backs and Watty thinks he needs to convert Lee, seriously what are Ally and Kenny doing letting Watty do this (or even consider this) laughing stock, that is what we are, whether he plays or not, we are a laughing stock for buying him in the first place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooperSF 5,792 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 Why? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted November 19, 2008 Author Share Posted November 19, 2008 Why Walter why? It could work out, Lee may be ok, but cannot see him being more than ok at best. Why not Broadfoot or McMillan who are much younger and that is their NATURAL position? Weird Walter! Weird! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts