SPFL Shambles

[Creampuff 22,628]

Who is it that’s presenting for each side?

[GersInCanada 7,775]

4 minutes ago, Creampuff said:

Depends on the relevance of the case tbh. Just because the background facts might be similar at a superficial level doesn’t mean there are relevant principles.

You may be right. I simply don't know - just seemed to me that if the judge quoted it to stop a QC's line of arguement then he clearly believes it is relevant. 

[alfredosgloves 84]

Jesus fuck this is a boring listen.  

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,823]

7 minutes ago, GersInCanada said:

You may be right. I simply don't know - just seemed to me that if the judge quoted it to stop a QC's line of arguement then he clearly believes it is relevant. 

Some Judges are like that some are not.

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,823]

4 minutes ago, alfredosgloves said:

Jesus fuck this is a boring listen.  

This is what I do daily, though crime is a bit faster paced 

[GersInCanada 7,775]

2 minutes ago, alfredosgloves said:

Jesus fuck this is a boring listen.  

I was just angling for the prestigious ' bore of the year award ' in posting the link in the first place. 

Got it on speaker phone but have stopped paying attention.

[CooperSF 5,792]

I hope I don’t get his with a massive fucking bill - listening for 2 hours now!

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,823]

Just now they want the Judge to distinguish (set aside) The St Johnstone case as they say statute has overtaken it. Hearts and Thistle will argue against this 

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,823]

1 minute ago, CooperSF said:

I hope I don’t get his with a massive fucking bill - listening for 2 hours now!

Free minutes!

[Creampuff 22,628]

19 minutes ago, GersInCanada said:

You may be right. I simply don't know - just seemed to me that if the judge quoted it to stop a QC's line of arguement then he clearly believes it is relevant. 

Ah, I’ve misunderstood your above post, mate. Ignore me.

[CooperSF 5,792]

Lunch break until 2.

[esquire8 43,014]

11 minutes ago, Blue Nosed Babe said:

Just now they want the Judge to distinguish (set aside) The St Johnstone case as they say statute has overtaken it. Hearts and Thistle will argue against this 

Basically the SPFL are saying that the St Johnstone case they won against the SFA should not be set as a precedent in this case. That's took 2 hours to try sort out? 🤷‍♂️

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,823]

4 minutes ago, esquire8 said:

Basically the SPFL are saying that the St Johnstone case they won against the SFA should not be set as a precedent in this case. That's took 2 hours to try sort out? 🤷‍♂️

Yes but note that the Judge wanted to know the SFA articles at the time of that case 

[semaj 1,637]

wonder who's paying for Dundee Utd QC.

[esquire8 43,014]

7 minutes ago, Blue Nosed Babe said:

Yes but note that the Judge wanted to know the SFA articles at the time of that case 

So the judge wants to see if the articles are the same? And if they are then the SPFL idea that this should be handled by the SFA will be thrown out?

[alfredosgloves 84]

18 minutes ago, semaj said:

wonder who's paying for Dundee Utd QC.

3 hours ago, GersInCanada said:

the

Whoever it is it will be some billing. Think he is getting paid by the minute, based upon that talk.  

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,823]

14 minutes ago, esquire8 said:

So the judge wants to see if the articles are the same? And if they are then the SPFL idea that this should be handled by the SFA will be thrown out?

Not exactly but it will decide if the case should be followed or not 

[Howsitgoing 4,281]

Don’t know if this is relevant ?

[eejay the dj 31,964]

Is corruption in full flow by now chaps .It’s almost what we expect .I will look in from time to time today ,probably not to be surprised 

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,823]

16 minutes ago, Howsitgoing said:

Don’t know if this is relevant ?

No one is doing that as nothing is being directly quoted.

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,823]

10 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

Is corruption in full flow by now chaps .It’s almost what we expect .I will look in from time to time today ,probably not to be surprised 

Morning arguments were by the opposition. Hearts and PT will be arguing after 2pm

[CooperSF 5,792]

Returning in 5 mins.

[Colin Traive 22,904]

“Your honour, the SFA and SPFL are two cheeks of the same arse. Wouldn’t let Fred rule on Rose’s trial or vice versa. The vote in April was, in legal parlance, a complete carve-up, as straight as a hairpin and was as right and fair as a Paki’s left elbow. That vote failed and all the shite that followed was avoidable and unnecessary. I recommend your honour be guided by the watchwords NULL and VOID. That concludes the case for justice, m’lud”

[GersInCanada 7,775]

SPFL getting their shot now.

[CooperSF 5,792]

9 minutes ago, GersInCanada said:

SPFL getting their shot now.

Edit.