thehost

If the media report Rangers fans booing a dead terrorist in bad terms then I for one would be proud - grow a set and stop living your life by what the media think
Off your knees

The same folk who revelled in Thatchers death seem to be mourning Mandela.
I'm sure the relatives of the folk who died/were injured at church street will be in disbelief at the fawning of Mandela.

If you want to "celebrate" the life of Mandela in public get oot into your fukin garden and applaud 'til the sun comes up. I'm going to Ibrox tomorrow to celebrate another three points not to kow tow to the fukwits in the mhedia who try to force their opinions on me

I would rather actually join the SOS protest than clap a racist terrorist.

Crucial game for us

We should be ensuring that we are the first to every ball and win every tackle.
A real show of intent

I`d ban all the instigators from Ibrox. And they can`t come out with the "I was just looking out for the club I love" pish as they were just telling lies to de-stable the club. Some life time bans for furry / dingwall ( that that it would matter to him ) / leggo / mini. Then after that start getting into the vermin mhedia that have been mini`s useful tools. keech jackson / britney / english etc. more life time bans. They need us and we don`t need them.

No I've not tried
And I never told you I was in the members
Suck must have told you
I'm too busy in life to get involved at the moment.
If I am ever not too busy and think I can add something I will until that time I will give my opinion whether people agree disagree or think its downright pish

Tell me why don't you ask that of the people's piper, deedle or anyone else.
Forums have always had pseudonyms you are the exception rather than the rule.
You seem to think it gives your view more validity because we know who you are whereas it does nothing of the sort. I am no one of any consequence apart from a supporter of The Rangers.
Couple of points what you would call allegations I would refer to as observations I.e. I make statements based upon what I witness then add in what I have seen in RL to give me a basis for what I type.
They are my opinion, not fact, my opinion.
I comment on areas where I have experience (business) and areas where I have none (riding Kelly brook), it makes not one jot of difference whether you know me as host or my real name.
Just as everyone else who posts are giving their opinion.
You accept it or treat it as trash.
My view is at least consistent. It maybe, in your eyes wrong but at least it's consistently wrong

Shares are up because they are unrealistically low, theres a board room battle and people have now started buying them
The damage was done much earlier on by the constant antics of the usual suspects
They went out of their way to destabilise the club to lower the share price and to get their arses on board
Some will think that is great
Some will think its not
Personally I want no one (senior exec or above) from David murrays time anywhere near that board. Others differ.

Tell me why don't you ask that of the people's piper, deedle or anyone else.
Forums have always had pseudonyms you are the exception rather than the rule.
You seem to think it gives your view more validity because we know who you are whereas it does nothing of the sort. I am no one of any consequence apart from a supporter of The Rangers.
Couple of points what you would call allegations I would refer to as observations I.e. I make statements based upon what I witness then add in what I have seen in RL to give me a basis for what I type.
They are my opinion, not fact, my opinion.
I comment on areas where I have experience (business) and areas where I have none (riding Kelly brook), it makes not one jot of difference whether you know me as host or my real name.
Just as everyone else who posts are giving their opinion.
You accept it or treat it as trash.
My view is at least consistent. It maybe, in your eyes wrong but at least it's consistently wrong

All the hate towards specific fans is getting extremely tiresome!!

Any one that runs to the record and Keith Jackson should not be anywhere near Ibrox. As for the £67m he is bringing into the club' Show us the proof.

It is indeed a sad day when posters call for other posters to be banned..............RIMA has been consistent with his posts and his reasons for not wanting anything to harm the Rangers.

I'd say this proves my point from the locked CG thread. Chris isn't a neutral observer in this debate any longer, he's an active participant. This is serious stuff. Chris would be well advised to heed Walt White's words to Hank in Breaking Bad: tread lightly.

Yeah it would.
Suppose the only other thing we need to consider is when this bonus was awarded and by whom.
I'm assuming that the rhebel are saying its green.
I remember when ahmed was going Mark Dingwall accused the mods, of this site, of costing RFC 500k in terms of a pay off for ahmed because they wouldn't break the law and provide information as to iamrangers ip addy etc.
So I assume this is the same 500k.

Has fury entered yet?
Carried on a throne, four waxed musclemen lifting him aloft.

Has fury entered yet?
Carried on a throne, four waxed musclemen lifting him aloft.

Has fury entered yet?
Carried on a throne, four waxed musclemen lifting him aloft.

Has fury entered yet?
Carried on a throne, four waxed musclemen lifting him aloft.

Has fury entered yet?
Carried on a throne, four waxed musclemen lifting him aloft.

The new breed of Rangers bloggers and spokesman don't really hit the spot the way David Edgar did. Looks like he still does too.

Ive already dismissed your pish about goian and boca they got pay offs ergo they are not off the wage bill
i have no idea what you are talking about when you say player wage bill
my understanding, last year, was that we had a wage bill of £7m that included non players
as to run thr club into the ground let me put it another way
in my view no player should be on more than 4 k a week
the management team should not be on more than 500k, combined.
we can change things when in the spl
at the moment we are spunking funds that are not necessary
i see little in the way of financial rectitude

I am led to believe that Rangers Finance Director Brian Stockbridge is to award himself a substantial wage CUT due to recent criticisms of the directorial remuneration structure at Ibrox.
Stockbridge is determined to demonstrate he is not at Ibrox just to make a quick buck; having spoken to him previously he let me know emphatically that he sees himself at Rangers for the long haul.
This should be good news for the Ibrox faithful because, although he is not one to blow his own trumpet, I know he works tirelessly to keep the wieldy Ibrox ship on course fiscally and has made massive dents into superfluous expenditure commitments racked up by previous big-spending administrators at the club.
In addition, he is helping to bring in deals that boost the club’s revenues and was a key player in the Huawei WIFI deal just recently announced.
As I have said before, Stockbridge is doing a fantastic job at Ibrox and, although he came in as part of the Charles Green consortium, he has managed to scotch any suggestions that he is a fast buck player. He has very much settled down in Scotland and Gers fans should be aware that his family is Scottish and he hails from a long line of bluenoses.
Rangers fans can rest easy knowing the club has a safe pair of hands directing its financial business.
That said, today’s media reports about Charles Green’s unhappiness at Rangers’ free-spending ways since he departed the CEO chair may alarm a few in the bluenose support.
There is concern among certain sections of the Ibrox fanbase that Ally McCoist is building a monster squad which can only be a drag on the club’s finances.
Recent pronouncements from the club tend to confirm this as the line has been taken that players must be moved on in the transfer window.
The ongoing tensions in the boardroom tend to be around this issue. Some investors want a board that will impose tighter fiscal controls on the club while others seem to favour a return to the days when Rangers’ chequebook was always open in good times or bad.
News of redundancies at the club doesn’t help bolster confidence, although it could be argued that they are part of necessary cost-cutting. Admittedly, that is no great comfort to those who are losing their jobs.
As always, there is a balanced path that can be taken in all of this. Rangers must ensure they have a squad capable of taking the club back to the top tier but there is no harm in doing this within strict and prudent cost-base parameters.
Running a football club at a profit is a very tricky business at any level but that is what those tasked with the business affairs of Rangers must do. The great danger at any club is when the demands of the team management derail wise business practices. We saw this happen all too often in the Murray years – Tore Andre Flo being a classic example.
It’s understandable that managers always want to improve their squad but we live in an age where more than ever team bosses must work hand in glove with the money men at clubs and be aware of limitations.
Given the need for financial modesty, it might not be too much to ask certain other highly-paid employees at Ibrox to follow the example of Brian Stockbridge and take a wage cut for the good of the club.
After all, as the famous adverts says, Every Little Helps.
Some people are going to have to find another hate figure

Your first lime says it all really.
We are aware of our Sheeple fan base that blindly follow follow should people have the right credentials, is rich "Real Rangers Man".
Surely it's not too much to ask for an accredited group like the RST to not follow follow the same path and actually ask pertinent questions of folk, no matter who they are. Instead they act as "muscle" to such people ensuring they get free reign and keep away those big bad businessmen that heaven forbid want to make money from their investment!