A bit of an aside, but something that has cropped up time and time again on this thread, and on the board in general, is the Rangers men thing. The “We Need Rangers Men” argument is crap. But equally crap is the “Aye, well look what happened with Rangers men before argument” Its 2 spastic arguments. We’ve had Rangers men on the board who have been great, and Rangers men who have been shit. To judge the merits of any potential owner, CEO or board member on whether or not they support Rangers is retarded. They should be judged on their ability to carry out the job in hand. A balance would be nice, some folk who know about the traditions, the club and the fans, and others who won’t have their head ruled by their heart. But ultimately the best man for the job should get the job.