boss

VB doing what they do best. Good work.

I pretty much agree with the above. I'd add a few points: - for a public company, there needs to be a separate resolution for each director (they could only be voted on as a group if that same GM first votes to allow this, which seems a rather superfluous point). s160(1) Companies Act 2006 - a public company must have at least 2 directors (our Articles and/or the listing rules may even make that higher, I haven't checked). s 154(2) Companies Act 2006. If that is breached (i.e. the OP's point about all directors being voted off and not replaced) the Secretary of State may direct the company to appoint directors. s156 Companies Act 2006 So while it is technically possible for each individual director to be voted off and not replaced, I cannot think of an example of this ever happening, and IMO it won't happen at our AGM. Amongst everything else, our shares would immediately be suspended.

Do you mean fit or uninjured?

Wasn't aware that Mr Struth was jailed for VAT fraud so your analogy makes perfect sense.

Companies House was my source this morning.

Meanwhile, Sandy Easdale has been appointed as a director of the club. That is rather bigger news.

Sandy Easdale has been appointed as a director of The Rangers Football Club Limited (formerly Sevco Scotland Limited). He has not (yet?) been appointed to the listed holding company, Rangers International Football Club plc. The directors of the company with the football club licence are therefore Mather, Stockbridge, J Easdale and S Easdale. The appointment form was lodged on Friday the 13th. If you listen very carefully, you can just about hear Mr Struth turning in his grave.

There are no fines.

Then you are wrong.

This is wrong. The BBC's info is years out of date. You no longer have to show share movements, a full list of shareholders at the return date is sufficient and indeed normal. A basic error by the BBC or deliberate scaremongering?

Excellent article - Chris at his best.

Gazza (although to be fair, Ian Ferguson had him in his pocket in his testimonial).

This shows up the Scottish football authorities to be the haters and blackmailers that we guessed they were.

Kyle is good but he's no Richard Foster.

If they are really worth that much (which they're not) maybe Jim McColl could ask them for a sub to buy some shares?

None

Toe the line and come to heel - it's red and black socks if you have any sole.

Brilliant story. Hopefully it might serve as a reminder to many of us that we're actually all on the same side - Rangers.

I'll call your "one good and valid reason" and raise you "£10m to Ticketus".

Who knew that CanadianMacbeth was so cult'yerd?

Delighted for Daly. He joined our Club, he plays his heart out, what's not to like about him?

Whatever the rights and wrongs, and the comings and goings, he did come over well in that interview.

Unfortunately it's written into the contracts that the media must be given seats as near to the half way line as possible.

Frank Blin is way above an executive FD position. He'd be better as Chairman. Perhaps with a hands-on FC he might consider FD, but I'd be surprised.

No surprise there then. The additional cost of having an EGM then a few weeks later an AGM would be a waste of money we can ill afford. In any event, I suspect that the directors would be up for re-election at the AGM in any event.