Cam1872

This is clear ammunition for those against Pedro.
I am finding less and less reasons to want to argue back to defend him.
At least under Warboid we had a plan A.
Pedro seems to have brought nothing even resembling that. Every manager has a style, what is Pedros?
You can blame the players, and they are con men, but how can we look so clueless, that starts with the manager.
I really cant buy into what I am seeing tactics wise.
 
 

This was my view originally, but creeping dread is setting in that he is might just actually be clueless.
I hope you are right. Even if you are, these records we have should be protected, thats what the club is about. 

This is clear ammunition for those against Pedro.
I am finding less and less reasons to want to argue back to defend him.
At least under Warboid we had a plan A.
Pedro seems to have brought nothing even resembling that. Every manager has a style, what is Pedros?
You can blame the players, and they are con men, but how can we look so clueless, that starts with the manager.
I really cant buy into what I am seeing tactics wise.
 
 

This is clear ammunition for those against Pedro.
I am finding less and less reasons to want to argue back to defend him.
At least under Warboid we had a plan A.
Pedro seems to have brought nothing even resembling that. Every manager has a style, what is Pedros?
You can blame the players, and they are con men, but how can we look so clueless, that starts with the manager.
I really cant buy into what I am seeing tactics wise.
 
 

Hill is an absolute class act

Feel gutted for Hill tbh. Clearly wants to stay.

Don't ruin my point with facts.

If you put Kenny Miller in any other players position except Fod, Hill and Bates I think he would do a better job than the players currently playing there. 
That really was a turgid stiff rank average performance. 
I actual haven't a clue how you fix that. It's so devoid of anything for the most part. 
 
 

Thank fuck that's over. Such a chore watching Rangers 
Roll on the end of the season

Miller lools like he is struggling.....Dodoo on lets get some goals.
Mckay should be involved way more. Anyone else think he might be wasted as a winger?   

We are trying to play 4-2-3-1 but it merges into a 4-3-3 when we are not careful and that makes us to open

I've said it before but I genuinely think he's talked himself into a job that he has no business having by bullshitting his way through the interview and the clowns who interviewed him bought it hook, line and sinker.

That's what I was going for. Way better than my effort.

We looked better at the back.
Absolutely woeful in midfield.
Garner is potentially the worst striker to ever play for us. 
When we get in the opposing haalf the players play like they have never met each other.
New manager syndrome is a myth. I do agree though that I'd expect a reaction from the players in some form. Seems to be no method to what he is doing so far?
More absolute dross is not good enough.
I have some serious reservations already. Will back Pedro though, he's got some job to do.

We looked better at the back.
Absolutely woeful in midfield.
Garner is potentially the worst striker to ever play for us. 
When we get in the opposing haalf the players play like they have never met each other.
New manager syndrome is a myth. I do agree though that I'd expect a reaction from the players in some form. Seems to be no method to what he is doing so far?
More absolute dross is not good enough.
I have some serious reservations already. Will back Pedro though, he's got some job to do.

Fair play..
I hope he works out, i tried to give a balanced view based on how i see it.
If I was choosing I am still not sure hee would have been top of the list.

His coaching CV is not the best granted but its still early days and there are loads of top coaches who didn't have the best of starts.
Of course he is opinionated and if you watch Pedro talk about his backroom team that's one characteristic he looks for in an assistant, he said himself he wants his coaches to challenge him and present new ideas if they have them.
Proven to be disruptive on two occasions over a playing career which spanned two decades, has also proven to be a leader and one of the most successful captains this club has ever had.
As for foreign managers, he's worked under two at Rangers and Advocaat had nothing but great things to say about him, hell he built a team around him ffs, but hey that doesn't count, the whole LeGuen scenario must mean he cant work under someone foreign <sigh>
Whether or not the guy is a "throbber" he, like Pedro and his team deserve the chance to prove himself and show that he has matured since retiring.

Numan. Class act, Dutch B team coach, lives here and loves Rangers, smart guy, good communicator. 

Why would you take on someone who has publicly voiced scepticism over this managerial appointment and the direction of the club ?...
- has a track record of using the media for his own ends to discredit Rangers managers.
- has been stripped of the Rangers captaincy twice
- whose English is possibly worse than Pedro's 
- whose job with Clyde sees them in danger of losing league status

Fair play to Murty. Apart from being let down by individuals, we did fairly well in that half.
He's at least shown he has had an impact on the players.
 

Fair play to Murty. Apart from being let down by individuals, we did fairly well in that half.
He's at least shown he has had an impact on the players.
 

Fair play to Murty. Apart from being let down by individuals, we did fairly well in that half.
He's at least shown he has had an impact on the players.
 

Fair play to Murty. Apart from being let down by individuals, we did fairly well in that half.
He's at least shown he has had an impact on the players.
 

Fair play to Murty. Apart from being let down by individuals, we did fairly well in that half.
He's at least shown he has had an impact on the players.
 

Fair play to Murty. Apart from being let down by individuals, we did fairly well in that half.
He's at least shown he has had an impact on the players.