Was it a goal?

[Simon. 7]

The camera angle showed the ball was past the post so there is no doubt it should have been a goal!!

[Chookes 25]

The camera angle showed the ball was past the post so there is no doubt it should have been a goal!!

The camera angle was not on the goal line though.

[minstral 5,375]

The camera angle showed the ball was past the post so there is no doubt it should have been a goal!!

The camera angle was not on the goal line though.

To all that said it was not a goal is our captain a liar, he was in no doubt and he is a honest player.

[Chookes 25]

The camera angle showed the ball was past the post so there is no doubt it should have been a goal!!

The camera angle was not on the goal line though.

To all that said it was not a goal is our captain a liar, he was in no doubt and he is a honest player.

I couldn't think of a more trustworthy player to believe in all honesty. We can only comment on the angle we saw it from though, not Weir's. That doesn't make us right.

[trueblue85 0]

it was blatantly a fuckin goal

[Thermopylae 15,288]

Just back from the game now ... I've still not seen any replay's yet, but i was sitting in row A, at the very end, probably one of the closest people to the linesman in the ground, and thought it was in when i seen it, so, going on first impressions, like the linesman ...

Yes, Goal.

Did the linesman run back towards the half way line immediately after the incident?

Nope he stood still cause the ball went out of play and he had about 4 players round him claiming for it, then the referee came over and spoke to him and then booked Mendes I think it was, and maybe someone else, and this was all about 3 yards from the corner flag ... so no.

It's just they said on the radio he did

[Barca1972 0]

Personally...I don't think it was all over. We shouldn't have needed to rely on that though. Novo, wee man. I don't know whether to kiss you for scoring the goal, or kick you in the arse for missing the other 2.

Chin up lads. We can bring it home!

BANG ON MATE!

[Maryann 0]

yes i think it was a goal, the camera angle wasnt in line with the post.

it was over the line from the angle which was shown therefore if the camera was on line with the post it would have been clearly in

[Frankie 505]

Yes it was a goal...

[HighlandBear 1]

Over 50 tims have voted in this poll..

Its there for all to see, the ball was over the line, but no point bleating about it now..

[Carsons Dog 9,878]

I the ball had gone that far over the touchline it would have been a throw in - no argument about it.

Why should it not be a goal then?

[Blue Stars Bearette 1]

saw the pic in the papers this morning it was a goal

[Orangeclement 619]

Just look at the bbc website, the have it as the a pic, you can clearly see his foot is well over the line, from the angle setanta have given it looks just over so if you are dead on the line its a good yard over the line how the linesman never saw it when he was standing on the line with NO_ONE obstructing his view i will never know.

[Orangeclement 619]

Yes it was a goal...

look at the line in comparison to his leg at least a foot.

[Boyd 0]

to be honest i dont think it was quite over the line, but cummon to fuck rangers.. we were all over Hibs last night and everyone knows that if nacho novo was decent at all he would of finished those 2 golden chances last night. He did well for his goal but he should have gone away with a hat-trick last night. thoughts??

[HighlandBear 1]

to be honest i dont think it was quite over the line, but cummon to fuck rangers.. we were all over Hibs last night and everyone knows that if nacho novo was decent at all he would of finished those 2 golden chances last night. He did well for his goal but he should have gone away with a hat-trick last night. thoughts??

Thoughts are that's 2 posts and yer 1st was a cracker too..

[Orangeclement 619]

to be honest i dont think it was quite over the line, but cummon to fuck rangers.. we were all over Hibs last night and everyone knows that if nacho novo was decent at all he would of finished those 2 golden chances last night. He did well for his goal but he should have gone away with a hat-trick last night. thoughts??

gtf ya yahoo

[Poacher 0]

Definite goal. Blatant fucking goal. Absolutely rampant goal. Bastards.

Yes, I think it crossed the line.

[Bobby 41]

not clear cut for me, so in clear light of day i think they made a fair call.

glad we can win it fairly instead

[minstral 5,375]

not clear cut for me, so in clear light of day i think they made a fair call.

glad we can win it fairly instead

But you were not on the park or near the incident but our captain say the ball was over why not believe him.

[Briton 394]

not clear cut for me, so in clear light of day i think they made a fair call.

glad we can win it fairly instead

But you were not on the park or near the incident but our captain say the ball was over why not believe him.

Our ex-captain Richard Gough got it dead right. The officials couldn't give it. I also think that tit Booth was right for once, it was more in than out, but it was not clear enough to be awarded.

[minstral 5,375]

not clear cut for me, so in clear light of day i think they made a fair call.

glad we can win it fairly instead

But you were not on the park or near the incident but our captain say the ball was over why not believe him.

Our ex-captain Richard Gough got it dead right. The officials couldn't give it. I also think that tit Booth was right for once, it was more in than out, but it was not clear enough to be awarded.

Were you on the park, never mind what Gough said, weir is the man you should listen to.

[GeneralCartmanLee 313]

Surely the picture ends the arguement, it's a clear goal....

[SonoftheSaltire 0]

Initially i didn't think it was a goal but upon watching the replay it confirmed to me that it was a goal!

From the angle at which the camera was sitting, if the ball could be seen on the left of the left post then it would be a goal.

This is all besides the point, we should have hit the target more than we did and i don't understand why you would field the same team (excl. velicka for miller) as you had done 4 days prior. We could have done with some fresher legs on the park. That is why we looked better when Novo and Lafferty came.

Novo can't be blamed for missing those shots as he is not a regular starter, he played well other than that.

[EmmaRfcx 0]

Tbh it doesn't actually matter if it was or wasn't a goal now.

We didnt get it at the end of the day.

Typical