Jump to content

David Weir - Hall of Fame?


NorthUistBear

Is he worthy?  

219 members have voted

  1. 1. Yes or No?

    • Yes
      105
    • No
      68
    • See what happens this season
      46


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think he should definately be sketched into the history books as a good player who gave his all and helped deliver a degree of success towards the end of his career.

A role model to those younger players when it comes to conditioning and attitude

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would normally say no for such a short Ibrox career, but he played such a significant role in turning round the Club following the le Guen debacle that I went for yes.

As has been said a perfect gent and role model, he is a Rangers Captain and acts like one. A worthy successor to the likes of George Young, Bobby Shearer and Richard Gough to name but a few.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great ambassador for the club - YES

Hall of fame - NO

The HOF should only be for the very top players we have had through the years such as Greig, McCoist, Gough etc. The word legend is banded around a lot at the moment. Players who have done well for us such as Davie Weir, Dado Prso and even wee Nacho shouldn't get in it because they have played for us for 3 or 4 seasons

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great ambassador for the club - YES

Hall of fame - NO

The HOF should only be for the very top players we have had through the years such as Greig, McCoist, Gough etc. The word legend is banded around a lot at the moment. Players who have done well for us such as Davie Weir, Dado Prso and even wee Nacho shouldn't get in it because they have played for us for 3 or 4 seasons

why?

if you have 3 or 4 influential seasons then that is more than enough. <cr>

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would love him to be on it. If only he had come to us 2 or 3 years before he did.

But if you put in Davie Weir then surely Novo, Boyd, Prso and Papac are in with a shout?

Ok, maybe not Papac. :P but he has achieved just as much and conducted himself just as well as Weir.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could argue a point for Novo, but at this moment in time Weir is the only player in our squad who merits a place in the hall of fame.

The length of service is almost irrelevant, because it's what you achieve during your time that defines you.

Weir has conducted himself with class and dignity and his performances on the park have been so vital in terms of turning our fortunes around.

It might seem like a bit of an exageration, but Weir is almost to Smith, what Butcher was to Souness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great ambassador for the club - YES

Hall of fame - NO

The HOF should only be for the very top players we have had through the years such as Greig, McCoist, Gough etc. The word legend is banded around a lot at the moment. Players who have done well for us such as Davie Weir, Dado Prso and even wee Nacho shouldn't get in it because they have played for us for 3 or 4 seasons

why?

if you have 3 or 4 influential seasons then that is more than enough. <cr>

Just think we are too quick to say someone is a legend after 2 or 3 seasons. However if weir has another exceptional season I may be convinced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could argue a point for Novo, but at this moment in time Weir is the only player in our squad who merits a place in the hall of fame.

The length of service is almost irrelevant, because it's what you achieve during your time that defines you.

Weir has conducted himself with class and dignity and his performances on the park have been so vital in terms of turning our fortunes around.

It might seem like a bit of an exageration, but Weir is almost to Smith, what Butcher was to Souness.

And what Gough was to Walter first time round.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could argue a point for Novo, but at this moment in time Weir is the only player in our squad who merits a place in the hall of fame.

The length of service is almost irrelevant, because it's what you achieve during your time that defines you.

Weir has conducted himself with class and dignity and his performances on the park have been so vital in terms of turning our fortunes around.

It might seem like a bit of an exageration, but Weir is almost to Smith, what Butcher was to Souness.

And what Gough was to Walter first time round.

(tu)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great ambassador for the club - YES

Hall of fame - NO

The HOF should only be for the very top players we have had through the years such as Greig, McCoist, Gough etc. The word legend is banded around a lot at the moment. Players who have done well for us such as Davie Weir, Dado Prso and even wee Nacho shouldn't get in it because they have played for us for 3 or 4 seasons

gazza is in hall fame and he only played for us for 3 seasons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Weir has been a great player and model pro/captain since he joined the club. He helped in no small part to turn around the club after the LEGuen debacle and has never let us down.

I'd wait until the end of this season before making any decisions as the only blip i see is his short spell here but i'm not sure if that should hamper his hall of fame entry or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great ambassador for the club - YES

Hall of fame - NO

The HOF should only be for the very top players we have had through the years such as Greig, McCoist, Gough etc. The word legend is banded around a lot at the moment. Players who have done well for us such as Davie Weir, Dado Prso and even wee Nacho shouldn't get in it because they have played for us for 3 or 4 seasons

Spot on! That accolade has to be earned over time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great ambassador for the club - YES

Hall of fame - NO

The HOF should only be for the very top players we have had through the years such as Greig, McCoist, Gough etc. The word legend is banded around a lot at the moment. Players who have done well for us such as Davie Weir, Dado Prso and even wee Nacho shouldn't get in it because they have played for us for 3 or 4 seasons

Spot on! That accolade has to be earned over time.

So should Gazza and WIlkins both be removed from the hall of fame? After all they were only here for a combined five years between them?

What about Souness? I know what he did in terms of restoring Rangers to their place as number 1, but as a player he was a guy who made less than 100 apperances for us during that time.

Or even Butcher. The backbone of the Souness revolution.A Ranger for 4 years, playing 176 games and winning five honours in that time.

On the other hand look what Weir has achieved. The backbone of the Smith revolution. A Ranger for 30 months (so far), playing 124 games and winning four honours in that time.

If you lay it out like that then there really isn't much between them.

IMO it seems that people are (generally) overlooking Weir's contribution because he isn't a really glamourous name and thats doing the guy an injustice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found

×
×
  • Create New...