gogzy 31,195 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 only juarez from thier current bunch of no-hopers ( maybe ledley)previous players i would have had would be, dicanio,larson, maybe moravcheck(sp?),possibly cadete and van hoydonkey toocant think of any more Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,624 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 I never discuss football with the filth whether at work or any other walk of life they are utter clueless wankers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboyrfc 296 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 Non biased: Scott Brown is a Rangers man and I know he would give his all for us.I've always admired Hinkel as a player because I follow German football.Historically I liked Alan Thompson. Always had a decent game against us when he wasn't getting sent off. Other unwashed players I admired but wouldn't have had on my team: Tommy Burns, Murdo McLeod, David Hannah, Craig Burley, Henrik Larsson, Paul Lambert, Brian O'Neill, Simon Donelly (his family was so Rangers it was ridiculous) and Jackie McNamara (until his testimonial became a Fenianism IRA fest)Don't be so fucking stupidI hate all that shite patter. He isn't a Rangers man. He plays for celtic and gets stuck right in to the Rangers. He is a scumbag and an extremely overrated player to say the least.Rangers man... don't make me laugh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillyBoyBJK 0 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 This timmy love-fest on this thread is bolk inducing.Spot on there mate There is not one of they bead rattlers I'd ever want playing for The Rangers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grfc1975 1 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 would of loved ledly to sign in the summer. celtic will noy get the bastout of him next to that headless chicken brown which only means goodtimes ahead for this season. 3 in a row nae bother. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie1807 146 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 What's with the fucking love in for Scott Brown?The man is utter shit at football, give me Lee McCulloch over him anyday Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie1807 146 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 Juarez, Rogne (for back-up), maybe Izaguirre, perhaps Stokes and/or Hooper for back-up.What has Rogne ever done to be considered for back up to the champs? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamFyfe 1,438 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 They're all shite Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cappa 24 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 Juarez instead of McCulloch. Forrest over Lafferty or Naismith. Ki over Edu. Hinkel over Whittaker or Broadfoot. That's it. I'm actually struggling to think of their players, there's that fucking many nowadays.Maloney and McCourt are good players on their day but they're too inconsistent and injury prone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dotty_84 0 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 Unreal Forrest why he's not done anything for the first team really yet? if McGeady was still there would cunts be wanting him anaw?!When a team is under pressure you see who is a real player, for me Celtic when gettign humped no cunt stood out, so none.They scout through fucking youtube! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboyrfc 296 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 Juarez instead of McCulloch. Forrest over Lafferty or Naismith. Ki over Edu. Hinkel over Whittaker or Broadfoot. That's it. I'm actually struggling to think of their players, there's that fucking many nowadays.Maloney and McCourt are good players on their day but they're too inconsistent and injury prone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmrfc1873 48 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 Don't be so fucking stupidI hate all that shite patter. He isn't a Rangers man. He plays for celtic and gets stuck right in to the Rangers. He is a scumbag and an extremely overrated player to say the least.Rangers man... don't make me laughRangers men don't play for THEM. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmrfc1873 48 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 People saying Ledley This is annoying me as well, Ledley's pish. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1873Graeme 6 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 Regardless of who has the best individual players, we are the better team overall and that's what matters.I thought Rangers were favourites for the title at the start of the transfer window anyway and the transfer activity of both teams since then have only confirmed this. Neil Lennon is just a ginger Tony Mowbray. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeBurn 57 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 Joe Ledley? He's fuckin' pish.Forrest, he's shite aswell. Fuck the lot of them, if they wear green and grey hoops, they shouldn't even be spoken in the same breath and Rangers Football Club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
doddsyRFC 1 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 Rogne for CB back up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IfYeCannae 48 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 Not one single bheast would make it into this Rangers team.Dire, dross, shite, pish, useless and that's just broon9. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
clelandhattrick 8 Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 What has Rogne ever done to be considered for back up to the champs?He impressed me in the February OF game until he went off injured, plus he's young and can be improved unlike Loovens and the freak Majstorovic.I'd rather still have Wilson though. Well, a Wilson that showed some loyalty to us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
djgazbcm 55 Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 The man was a true humble practicing Catholic who hated sectarianism. As much as I hate Catholicism I don't begrudge anyone for being a firm believer in their own religion. I doubt he did it to wind us up, he wasn't like that. I may be in the minority but the man was a gentleman who hated no one. He was simply religious that's all there was to it.Unfortunately like Bobby Russell Scotland had fantastic midfielders during the 80s. He should have won more caps than he did.FUCKKIN WELL SAID MATE ...TB was a gentleman loved by everyone in the game ,,ask ally and walter smith what they thought of him ..guaranteed they would call him a LEGEND .....u had ur beliefs and stuck by them tb ..u where an awesome footballer and i apologise for the pish u endured by simpletons ...utmost respect to a FOOTBALLING LEGEND who had believed and understood his faith withouit malice towards us.. RIP Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baltic_blue 108 Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 FUCKKIN WELL SAID MATE ...TB was a gentleman loved by everyone in the game ,,ask ally and walter smith what they thought of him ..guaranteed they would call him a LEGEND .....u had ur beliefs and stuck by them tb ..u where an awesome footballer and i apologise for the pish u endured by simpletons ...utmost respect to a FOOTBALLING LEGEND who had believed and understood his faith withouit malice towards us.. RIPwithout malice towards us? nah cant agree sorry. do you expect McCoist and Smith to say he was a prick? i have no doubt that McCoist and Smith ended up friends with him but to say he didnt hate Rangers is being silly. as i said in this thread before i have respect for Celtic players like Burns who grew up supporting the filth unlike the daft foreigners who get caught up in it but to say he didnt hate Rangers is stupid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
deleteduser1 169 Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 I wouldn't swap any of our players for any celtc player at the moment but I might be persuaded to give them Lafferty if he doesn't get his finger out this season for Forrest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmrfc1873 48 Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 without malice towards us? nah cant agree sorry. do you expect McCoist and Smith to say he was a prick? i have no doubt that McCoist and Smith ended up friends with him but to say he didnt hate Rangers is being silly. as i said in this thread before i have respect for Celtic players like Burns who grew up supporting the filth unlike the daft foreigners who get caught up in it but to say he didnt hate Rangers is stupid.This, it was well known that Tommy Burns was a raging hater of Rangers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IfYeCannae 48 Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 The man was a true humble practicing Catholic who hated sectarianism. As much as I hate Catholicism I don't begrudge anyone for being a firm believer in their own religion. I doubt he did it to wind us up, he wasn't like that. I may be in the minority but the man was a gentleman who hated no one. He was simply religious that's all there was to it.Unfortunately like Bobby Russell Scotland had fantastic midfielders during the 80s. He should have won more caps than he did.Are we talking about the same tommy burns, opus dei tommy burns??The tommy burns who hated everything Rangers stood for, constantly sticking his finger(s) up at any opportunity, in the mean time crossing himself, his religion did not allow him to like Protestants.That air in New Zealand must be messing about with your sensibilities. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts