Jump to content

Midfield


sco22y

Recommended Posts

all us fans know that edu and jig dont work together as there is no spark there.its been said on here forever and some more.but come on, why does walter pick them together in a 5 man midfield? blooming negativity that is why.looking to nick a 1 nil.

we should be looking to make a statement today.looking to show that hearts arent in the title race.what do we do?show them that we fear them by playing 1 up front.

subs were wrong as well.ness and edu were the best of the midfield today yet they both got took off.should have been jig and naismith.

why do we use 1 up front in the spl? it is a joke.

Link to post
Share on other sites

all us fans know that edu and jig dont work together as there is no spark there.its been said on here forever and some more.but come on, why does walter pick them together in a 5 man midfield? blooming negativity that is why.looking to nick a 1 nil.

we should be looking to make a statement today.looking to show that hearts arent in the title race.what do we do?show them that we fear them by playing 1 up front.

subs were wrong as well.ness and edu were the best of the midfield today yet they both got took off.should have been jig and naismith.

why do we use 1 up front in the spl? it is a joke.

It is a joke and never necessary in the SPL. Bloody awful tactics.

Link to post
Share on other sites

all us fans know that edu and jig dont work together as there is no spark there.its been said on here forever and some more.but come on, why does walter pick them together in a 5 man midfield? blooming negativity that is why.looking to nick a 1 nil.

we should be looking to make a statement today.looking to show that hearts arent in the title race.what do we do?show them that we fear them by playing 1 up front.

Aye?

How do you explain us playing hearts off the pitch then for all of the first 45 and most of the second? Negativity is it?

We had good chances and did not take them - that cost us the game above all else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye?

How do you explain us playing hearts off the pitch then for all of the first 45 and most of the second? Negativity is it?

We had good chances and did not take them - that cost us the game above all else.

first 35 mins aye.hearts got to grips with us after that.most of the second half was shocking, only snap shot from jelavic was of any note.

oh sorry we were so positive. i take it back <cr>

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets make dozens of banner saying 442 or go and protest at Ibrox.

Better still we will stop going to games and stop following Rangers :BELM:

Or just sit on a forum 8 hours a day moaning about Rangers and WS tactics.

What a difference a goal would of made,half of use wouldn't of even posted a thing. (tu)

Theres still 18 games left,get a fucking grip.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you kidding on? Ive never seen us run over a midfield in the opening half hour so much in a long time. Ness and Edu's dig was great Ness and Edu getting forward... Its a total Myth saying 4-5-1 is negative when you have the likes of Naismith/Davis/Edu/Ness all supporting, its just made to look negative when we start going Long... and WS isnt to blame for that, the players are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets make dozens of banner saying 442 or go and protest at Ibrox.

Better still we will stop going to games and stop following Rangers :BELM:

Or just sit on a forum 8 hours a day moaning about Rangers and WS tactics.

What a difference a goal would of made,half of use wouldn't of even posted a thing. (tu)

Theres still 18 games left,get a fucking grip.

aye right u are pal,if you are not unhappy after that game thats totally up to you.

18 games left or not, todays game was one we will look back on if the league is lost.

doesnt matter what matchday number it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you kidding on? Ive never seen us run over a midfield in the opening half hour so much in a long time. Ness and Edu's dig was great Ness and Edu getting forward... Its a total Myth saying 4-5-1 is negative when you have the likes of Naismith/Davis/Edu/Ness all supporting, its just made to look negative when we start going Long... and WS isnt to blame for that, the players are.

lafferty was always isolated to the point that all he had on when he got the ball was a long shot at goal.

naisy and another midfielder in theory were meant to join in attacks with him but the time it took them to get up in support their defence was back in position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think always blaming the formation is way off the mark. RangersMedia FC play a 4-5-1 and yet we're one of the most attacking sides in our league, its all about how we play it.

Granted at this moment in time we dont have the players to utilise such a formation, but folk need to stop thinking because its a 4-5-1 its negative.

Thats the best we've played in a while, shit result.

And Lafferty still wouldnt get even get on RMFCs bench.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lafferty was always isolated to the point that all he had on when he got the ball was a long shot at goal.

naisy and another midfielder in theory were meant to join in attacks with him but the time it took them to get up in support their defence was back in position.

(tu) I said in the 1st half there was only so long we could keep it up, we fell away after the 1st half, too long getting up to support and we started long ball shite

Link to post
Share on other sites

wrong OP the midfield imo outplayed and outhassled the Hearts today it was the finishing that was fucking embarrasingly bad.

we could have won that midfield battle with 4 midfielders no dramas.no need for 5 that is what im saying

Link to post
Share on other sites

aye right u are pal,if you are not unhappy after that game thats totally up to you.

18 games left or not, todays game was one we will look back on if the league is lost.

doesnt matter what matchday number it is.

Go and support Barcelona if you want free flowing attacking football. (tu)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we'd have played Weiss Fleck & Naismith as support to Lafferty then that would've been very attacking and i'm sure would've resulted in goals.

Unfortunetly Davis Edu & Naismith didn't have the same clout.

Which is why we go behind so often, and only then does walter start throwing on the attacking players, and give Naismith licence to play further up the pitch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
×
×
  • Create New...