TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 I think Rangers fans fighting and moaning at other Rangers fans on here because they don't agree with the harsh criticism is worse tbh.No it isn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 i took my figure of 6 from 8 in the comentary for the sporting game and extrapolated. anyway adronium was talking shite we are doing better than last year with the same tactics. that was the essence of my post. No problem, but I know you're a stickler for accuracy. I will let him argue his own case and I look forward to the reply about your spelling of his username! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 2nd in the league and couldn't beat 10 men in the cup.Couldn't beat an average Sporting Lisbon.Couldn't beat the filth at home in the League.Couldn't beat Hearts at Tynecastle.The warning signs are there and that is not talking shite that's stating the obvious.That's not selective at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 2nd in the league and couldn't beat 10 men in the cup.Couldn't beat an average Sporting Lisbon.Couldn't beat the filth at home in the League.Couldn't beat Hearts at Tynecastle.The warning signs are there and that is not talking shite that's stating the obvious.you asked if we were getting the same results from the same tactics. you were right we werent we are getting better ones. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 That's not selective at all.hes not done his homework and came out fighting instead of appologising. hey ho hes not the only person i know that works like that. and i like him anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 hes not done his homework and came out fighting instead of appologising. hey ho hes not the only person i know that works like that. and i like him anyway.Who? Adoniram?Yeah, he's lovely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 No problem, but I know you're a stickler for accuracy. I will let him argue his own case and I look forward to the reply about your spelling of his username! i knew it wasnt right or at least is suspected but i am short on time this morning and for that i appologise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Who? Adoniram?Yeah, he's lovely.yeah i am thinking of coming to lunch with you two if you will have me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 yeah i am thinking of coming to lunch with you two if you will have me Might spoil the romance a little. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Might spoil the romance a little.true. 3 somes are overrated. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 That's not selective at all.Of course it's selective. They are the harder games where, for one reason or another, we have shown we are unwilling/unable to amend our way of playing. If you want to glory in the crushing of Motherwell or Hamilton, feel free, but that would also magnify the difference in approach. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 i knew it wasnt right or at least is suspected but i am short on time this morning and for that i appologise.No need to apologise. I thought you had done it to be cheeky. I obviously read too much into it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Of course it's selective. They are the harder games where, for one reason or another, we have shown we are unwilling/unable to amend our way of playing. If you want to glory in the crushing of Motherwell or Hamilton, feel free, but that would also magnify the difference in approach.Yes, lets ignore the harder games we did win by amending our style. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Yes, lets ignore the harder games we did win by amending our style.Feel free to discuss them too. You don't need to make every post reactionary. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Feel free to discuss them too. You don't need to make every post reactionary. What did you say about my Mother?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 No need to apologise. I thought you had done it to be cheeky. I obviously read too much into it.it was an error. i was really apologising to him and i do genuinly like him as a poster. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 No it isn't.TWB in disagreeing with the majority for attention shocker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts