TerryButchersDoor 8 Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 Can anyone clarify? Not had time to look but both have been quoted. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougieGers 26 Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 Few places are reporting but nothing confirmed yet Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterD 7,446 Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 2015 so 4 years Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-Hadji Spit RFC 733 Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 Has there even been mention on the official website?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prince of Denmark 10 Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 its like a 4 year extension. obviously with better wages than he's on now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicika Jelavic 7 Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 Don't know why you have posted this in the transfer section.. but the answer is that he has signed a 4 year deal, but because he already had a year left on his deal it means he will be here for another 5 years. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryButchersDoor 8 Posted August 25, 2011 Author Share Posted August 25, 2011 Don't know why you have posted this in the transfer section.. but the answer is that he has signed a 4 year deal, but because he already had a year left on his deal it means he will be here for another 5 years.The deal has not been signed yet, according to today's reports. Don't know why you can't spell the name of Rangers' star striker NIKICA JELAVIC...but in that case what about McGregor? He signed a 5 yr deal in 2008 and then a 6 year deal this summer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicika Jelavic 7 Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 The deal has not been signed yet, according to today's reports. Don't know why you can't spell the name of Rangers' star striker NIKICA JELAVIC...but in that case what about McGregor? He signed a 5 yr deal in 2008 and then a 6 year deal this summer.Pipe down, the other username was taken... He didn't sign a 6 year deal, much like in this case McGregor still had 1/2 years left on his contract, so he signed a 4/5 year extension which totals to 6 years. Keep up son he's signed the fucking contract. "I'm absolutely delighted the deal is done. It's a huge weight off my shoulders and it means I can just concentrate on my future with Rangers” Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jelavic18 644 Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 Confirmed on Rangers.co.uk that he has agreed a 5 year dealMy link Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryButchersDoor 8 Posted August 25, 2011 Author Share Posted August 25, 2011 Pipe down, the other username was taken... He didn't sign a 6 year deal, much like in this case McGregor still had 1/2 years left on his contract, so he signed a 4/5 year extension which totals to 6 years. Keep up son he's signed the fucking contract. "I'm absolutely delighted the deal is done. It's a huge weight off my shoulders and it means I can just concentrate on my future with Rangers”You pipe down. Explain this one then:http://www.rangers.co.uk/articles/20110704/gers-duo-sign-up_2254024_2385958McGregor, 29, has netted a six-year contractSeems a serious misrepresentation to make such a claim if he's only signed for 4.5 years.Especially since he had TWO YEARS left, not 18 months. So your sums fall apart. Is he staying for 6.5 years then?summer 2008: signs 5 year deal, taking him to summer 2013http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/r/rangers/7477287.stmsummer 2011: with 2 YEARS LEFT, signs 6 year dealAs for Wylde, It was only confirmed he signed the deal just before the game Other sources for 6 year deal claim:http://www.<No links to this website>/football/spl/2011/07/05/rangers-goalkeeper-allan-mcgregor-pens-six-year-deal-and-vows-i-m-at-ibrox-for-life-86908-23248644/http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/14013550.stm Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicika Jelavic 7 Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 You pipe down. Explain this one then:http://www.rangers.co.uk/articles/20110704/gers-duo-sign-up_2254024_2385958Seems a serious misrepresentation to make such a claim if he's only signed for 4.5 years.Especially since he had TWO YEARS left, not 18 months. So your sums fall apart. Is he staying for 6.5 years then?summer 2008: signs 5 year deal, taking him to summer 2013http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/r/rangers/7477287.stmsummer 2011: with 2 YEARS LEFT, signs 6 year dealAs for Wylde, It was only confirmed he signed the deal just before the game I don't see why your getting all passionate I only told you to pipe down because you were having a dig at my username which was frankly irrelevant. It wasn't before the game so stop talking out your arse, look when I posted the comment. Fine I was wrong about the six year deal, no need to go and get all fucking mega serious about it which I don't know why you did in the first place, All I said was that this was in the wrong place which it was. Don't fucking cry and call me a wanker. Jeeeez. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryButchersDoor 8 Posted August 25, 2011 Author Share Posted August 25, 2011 I don't see why your getting all passionate I only told you to pipe down because you were having a dig at my username which was frankly irrelevant, I also don't know . It wasn't before the game so that's wrong. Fine I was wrong about the six year deal, no need to go and get all fucking mega serious about it which I don't know why you did in the first place, All I said was that this was in the wrong place which it was. Don't fucking cry and call me a wanker. Jeeeez.If you're telling me to Keep up son and pipe down i'd expect you to have some faith in your position. Sadly it was misplaced. Failing that, why not actually try and be helpful rather than cause trouble, or just not bother at all. I was asking a simple question in the first place.It wasn't before the game so stop talking out your arse,So why did Jelavic18 post the news at 6.52? Because Rangers didn't confirm it until then. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GersAvA92 53 Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 5 years I think, first quote was 4 but the pre-match last night said 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicika Jelavic 7 Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 If you're telling me to and i'd expect you to have some faith in your position. Sadly it was misplaced. Failing that, why not actually try and be helpful rather than cause trouble, or just not bother at all. I was asking a simple question in the first place.So why did Jelavic18 post the news at 6.52? Because Rangers didn't confirm it until then. Cause trouble, all I did was answer your question and tell you that this was the wrong place to post this thread.I have no idea why Jelavic18 posted it at that time, All I know is that I posted it well before 6.52. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AW-WATP 112 Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Think his wages should be based on how many crosses he can get by the 1st man! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfc_no1fan 13 Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 I am still baffled as to why he was offered a 5 year deal.What has Greg Wylde done for Rangers to justify such a deal?Should have been 3 years max IMO. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWalterSmithLegend 206 Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 I am still baffled as to why he was offered a 5 year deal.What has Greg Wylde done for Rangers to justify such a deal?Should have been 3 years max IMO.But hes fast and is a Rangers fan. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NessFTW 40 Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 I am still baffled as to why he was offered a 5 year deal.What has Greg Wylde done for Rangers to justify such a deal?Should have been 3 years max IMO.Not got much to lose seeing as how he's on relatively small wages. Better getting the extra couple years security IMO. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue corn flakes 1,282 Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 But hes fast and is a Rangers fan. Tbh mate, he put some cracking crosses in on thursday night. More of the same please. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWalterSmithLegend 206 Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Tbh mate, he put some cracking crosses in on thursday night. More of the same please.I personally thought his crossing was very average, also if i had a pound for everytime he got the ball and cut back the way because he couldnt beat his man i would be loaded! So much still to learn the wee man. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace 3,556 Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 He has the potential to become very good player.Sometimes you have to tie that potential down, what would you think If we lost him to Bolton for £500k or in 2 years time when he has developed into a more effective winger but we lose him because we failed to spot potential. Damned if we do, damned if we don't .. The club can't win Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWalterSmithLegend 206 Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 He has the potential to become very good player.Sometimes you have to tie that potential down, what would you think If we lost him to Bolton for £500k or in 2 years time when he has developed into a more effective winger but we lose him because we failed to spot potential. Damned if we do, damned if we don't .. The club can't winThere is no way anyone can moan about us tying a youth down for a long period of time, especially one who has done us a turn in the first team and will only get better. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfc_no1fan 13 Posted August 29, 2011 Share Posted August 29, 2011 He has the potential to become very good player.Sometimes you have to tie that potential down, what would you think If we lost him to Bolton for £500k or in 2 years time when he has developed into a more effective winger but we lose him because we failed to spot potential. Damned if we do, damned if we don't .. The club can't winCould have been a 3 year deal with the option of another year.Maybe it's just me, but I don't see him as a good player. Everyone went on about his great crossing ability, when 2-3 out of 10 is more accurate.I hope he proves me wrong, but I feel he is in the team by default and if everyone was fit he'd be on the bench. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.