50ShadesofBlue 667 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 I doubt the referee assessor is doing his job properly because if he was then Brines would be working in the SFL and not SPL. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmyblue75 20 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 See those words, utterly useless. This is the kind of thinking thats led us to the road of ruin.Is it really? I'd love to hear ur explanation To back that up? Load off fucking mince Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Book of Ruth 1 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 I doubt the referee assessor is doing his job properly because if he was then Brines would be working in the SFL and not SPL.Brines will take a hammering from the assessor for that performance. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Der Hammer 160 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 I doubt the referee assessor is doing his job properly because if he was then Brines would be working in the SFL and not SPL.He shouldn't be a ref anywhere,why should the SFL have to put up with the wanker? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash07 26 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 To be fair to the poor cunt, after just watching the highlights there, it seemed he was slightly unsighted and Sone did delay a touch before going down.That said, he was entitled to go down as there was undoubted contact. Just saying I don't think it was as bad as some are making out. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Book of Ruth 1 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 To be fair to the poor cunt, after just watching the highlights there, it seemed he was slightly unsighted and Sone did delay a touch before going down.That said, he was entitled to go down as there was undoubted contact. Just saying I don't think it was as bad as some are making out.Yes it was. McCoist said he heard the contact even before he'd had the benefit of watching it again.Brines must have heard it. Even if he didn't see enough to give the penalty, the sound of the tackle should have stopped him booking Aluko.I also read elsewhere that the BBC commentators heard the contact in the press area. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy 68 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 To be fair to the poor cunt, after just watching the highlights there, it seemed he was slightly unsighted and Sone did delay a touch before going down.That said, he was entitled to go down as there was undoubted contact. Just saying I don't think it was as bad as some are making out.If he was at all unsighted then how can he conclude that he dived? If there is any doubt at all he can't make that call. Fair enough not giving the penalty, but to book him was an absolute shambles. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Escobar 13,676 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 I just watched the highlights and the decisions were piss poor.How can he book Whittaker? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash07 26 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 Yes it was. McCoist said he heard the contact even before he'd had the benefit of watching it again.Brines must have heard it. Even if he didn't see enough to give the penalty, the sound of the tackle should have stopped him booking Aluko.I also read elsewhere that the BBC commentators heard the contact in the press area.Like most I'm not a big fan of Referees, but I do realise they have a very very difficult job, I doubt that an unidentified noise will have registered greatly in the nano-second he had to make a decision. Whatever, we won and referees make mistakes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Book of Ruth 1 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 :mervan: Like most I'm not a big fan of Referees, but I do realise they have a very very difficult job, I doubt that an unidentified noise will have registered greatly in the nano-second he had to make a decision. Whatever, we won and referees make mistakes.An unidentified noise? I think he was close enough to identify the noise.In any case, as stated before, he had no grounds for booking Aluko if he couldn't see the incident...although Brines has previous for making up incidents in his head, like the lead-up to Diamond's goal against the filth a few years ago. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,287 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 Like most I'm not a big fan of Referees, but I do realise they have a very very difficult job, I doubt that an unidentified noise will have registered greatly in the nano-second he had to make a decision. Whatever, we won and referees make mistakes.... a level playing field would be nice all the same Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Blue_Flash 390 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 In both the spl and premier league there are so many refs that are terrible and cause teams points, ignore tackles which lead to injuries and can cause relegation, so many decisions this season in both leagues absolute joke, I just wish there was some real repercussions for their actions and they wouldn't do, players, managers, even players not on the park can get into trouble, banned, fined, if refs had that then they wouldn't constantly cheat Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 As I've said before, Ian Brines is an incompetent cunt. The Willie Young for a new generation, if you will. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.