ZZed 4,510 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Tried to change it but seems you cannot for titles. Your the grammar police?The banner was correct but the title of this thread is wrong. If I am the grammar police then standards have dropped. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
govanblue 16,847 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Tried to change it but seems you cannot for titles. Your the grammar police?You can change it mate (if not on a phone)Go to your first post, click edit, then click "use full editor" - the title appears twice at the top - the lower one is editable Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bombaybadboy08 15,660 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 These guys clearly let their heart rule their head,they mean well but are so far out of touch with reality it's unreal.I've seen some people say 'I thought we had money,why do we need to do this?'Well if you have money in your pocket and someone offers you more for very little effort,you don't say 'No thanks,I have enough'Scottish football is dying on it's arse,struggling for investment,decent TV deals and here's our CEO thinking outside the box and being labelled a Pimp. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZZed 4,510 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 You can change it mate (if not on a phone)Go to your first post, click edit, then click "use full editor" - the title appears twice at the top - the lower one is editable Now i will look more stupid than usual when someone reads this Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
govanblue 16,847 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Would it not be Prostituting our heritage or prostitution of our heritage? Where are the grammar police? no, prostituting of our heritage is grammatically acceptable.Think "taming of the shrew" or "the hunting of the snark"Grammar police stand down, it's a false alarm - phew! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZZed 4,510 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 no, prostituting of our heritage is grammatically acceptable.Think "taming of the shrew" or "the hunting of the snark"Grammar police stand down, it's a false alarm - phew!I failed my grammar police test Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
govanblue 16,847 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Now i will look more stupid than usual when someone reads this Yeah, but then they'll look at your avatar, and say "aaaaaw, isn't he cute?" Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Like it or not, its Greens job to maximize our profitability.Would they prefer a CEO who sees his job as paying himself an inflated salary or paying clubs to take players off us? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
govanblue 16,847 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 I failed my grammar police test you can resit it next season - we're finding it hard to recruit new officers, so we'll be lowering the standards Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZZed 4,510 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 I picked this avatar as the wife has it on her arse. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
govanblue 16,847 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 I picked this avatar as the wife has it on her arse.shit stick to the fur, does it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZZed 4,510 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 shit stick to the fur, does it? Her arse is not hairy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
govanblue 16,847 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Her arse is not hairy. I worry about what might happen if you feed it after midnight Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bombaybadboy08 15,660 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 I reckon Charles should respond with a speech on the park at the next home game,and come out to this...http://youtu.be/3Op2MZTLKY8 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
downviewbear 151 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Dosnt matter who sponsors are great stadium itll still be ibrox to all of us that matter. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Non_Sucumbi 876 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 A stupid banner by a bunch of clueless people who appear to be stuck in some kind of a 'time warp'.If there is a doctor in the house...... please cram them into the 'Tardis' and transport them to 2013.We as a club almost vanished from the football 'menu'. Our finances need bolstering. If that means a new name for Ibrox for a few years then so be it. I suspect many of these supporters also complain about the state of the stadium. Well upkeep costs money. Do you suggest CG just picks the cash from 'the money tree'??Charles Green, when he leaves, hopefully will leave a legacy of sound financial management. No more bug-eyes or Murrays as we have been through enough in the past 12 months. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christchurch Rangers 1,229 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 In new zealand everything in sport is sponsoredclubs names, the grounds, everythingI can't stand it and i refuse to refer to stadiums in any other way than the original nameas far as renaming Ibrox...the only concession I would agree to would be one that still referred to the ground as Ibrox and then there was some sponsor bollox added oneven then i wouldn't be happyyeah we have to make ends meet but i'd hate to see Ibrox renamed in a crappy deal for loot Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKingObv 10,663 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 scabs Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WadeWilson 4,670 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Tried to change it but seems you cannot for titles. Your the grammar police?No I am. (* You're) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanFerguson2012 123 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 I didn't like the wording. Not sure that advertising can be classed as prostitution. The ground is full of electronic adverts every game. I wish they would stop the bright yellow ones but that's beside the point. It's a hard slog back to the top & we need money to come in. We need better players and the best facilities. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 It'll be forgotten about in five minute if/when it happens.Indeed, people will moan about it initially and then eventually come around. No point in even debating it, I think. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordonb23 99 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 This doesn't sit well with me at all.I know people are saying that it's money for nothing and it will always be Ibrox to them not matter what it's called, but we have one of the most beautiful stadiums in the world and to see it tarted up with sports direct signs anywhere possible would be heartbreaking.Just look at what St. James Park looked like. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBluenose1972 1,405 Posted February 10, 2013 Author Share Posted February 10, 2013 Just look at what St. James Park looked like.Got any pics? Did it changed that dramatically? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordonb23 99 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Got any pics? Did it changed that dramatically?Just google image 'sports direct arena'. The roof advertising was terrible. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Its hardly 'prostitution' bit of an overreaction, in a perfect world no club would have sponsors of any kind nor any advertising allowed inside a stadium but this is a far from perfect world and we need to stay financialy competitive not just in Scotland but Europe too. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.