RST 19 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 RST, how do you know a guy was contacting people? Does this contacting guy remain firm friends with the leader of the RST? Believe me, I don't want a slanging match here, but you're being a wee bit evasive here.He told our Chairman that he was contacting all the groups. I know his name but I don't know him or who he is friendly with I have checked tonight to see if he is a member and he isn't. . I'm not sure what else you want me to say, other than his name which I'm not prepared to do. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resting in my account 231 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 When your first sentence is a blatant lie it's difficult to give any credibility to anything else you say. There was a guy contacting groups but rather than 'a well known RST activist' he isn't even a member of the RST.Now now Mrs, if one is going to call people liars you should disect what I said. I said a well known RST activist, not member. We are both aware that said person has worked on behalf of the RST many times and better still was acting on the RST Codfathers behest when he contacted the groups. Given his involvement in the statement also, does this not constitute acting on their behalf? Some might say his "acting" would qualify him as an "activist"? No? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Just name the fanny Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Callahan 9 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Now now Mrs, if one is going to call people liars you should disect what I said. I said a well known RST activist, not member. We are both aware that said person has worked on behalf of the RST many times and better still was acting on the RST Codfathers behest when he contacted the groups. Given his involvement in the statement also, does this not constitute acting on their behalf? Some might say his "acting" would qualify him as an "activist"? No?That sounds a bit fishy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainofIndustry 921 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 I don't want you to name him, both of us know who he is. Are you seriously telling all the RM members, you don't know this guy is mates with the RST leader? As I said, I can't be bothered getting involved in a them and us debate. However, you're being slightly economical about this bloke and who he's mates with from the Trust.Deal with the biggest divisive cancer in our support and many would support your organisation.Who are we talking about here? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resting in my account 231 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Who are we talking about here?I think he sells Pineapples in cans Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resting in my account 231 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 That sounds a bit fishy.He may well be Godfather to some, but watching him rip through Fish Suppers I think Codfather is more apt Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Callahan 9 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Don't think it's fair naming people mate. I wouldn't do that and don't believe we should ever do so. Let's just say he's a prominent poster on FF and mates with the big yin I think he sells Pineapples in cans Comedy fucking gold. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RST 19 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Now now Mrs, if one is going to call people liars you should disect what I said. I said a well known RST activist, not member. We are both aware that said person has worked on behalf of the RST many times and better still was acting on the RST Codfathers behest when he contacted the groups. Given his involvement in the statement also, does this not constitute acting on their behalf? Some might say his "acting" would qualify him as an "activist"? No?I've already said I don't know the guy. Are you seriously suggesting that a Board member got someone else to contact our Chairman about a statement? Let me know about the many times this guy has worked for the RST. I'd be very interested. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resting in my account 231 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 I've already said I don't know the guy. Are you seriously suggesting that a Board member got someone else to contact our Chairman about a statement? Let me know about the many times this guy has worked for the RST. I'd be very interested.Get back over there and get something better to throw back at me that warrants a reply. If you are trying to tell me that said person is not linked to the Mistrust and has worked with them in the past then I suggest you sign off your shift and send Buzz over dear Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 I always thought the man from yon fruit advert said yes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resting in my account 231 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 I always thought the man from yon fruit advert said yes. That not the Dolmio man? Or the Milky Bar kid? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RST 19 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Get back over there and get something better to throw back at me that warrants a reply. If you are trying to tell me that said person is not linked to the Mistrust and has worked with them in the past then I suggest you sign off your shift and send Buzz over dear I've only just got your cryptic clue and it is way off the mark. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainofIndustry 921 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 I've already said I don't know the guy. Are you seriously suggesting that a Board member got someone else to contact our Chairman about a statement? Let me know about the many times this guy has worked for the RST. I'd be very interested.If you're seriously telling us you "don't know" the FF poster with the username associated with Spanish tinned fruit, I'd have to say I don't believe you. Nothing you could say would convince me that you're telling the truth if that's what you're claiming. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Callahan 9 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 I honestly think this so called internet / forums rivalry debate is a little overplayed. Basically we're talking about a few individuals who will say and do anything to protect the empire and business. 99.9% of Rangers fans only want what's best for the club and support.We may differ on certain issues at times, but on the whole, we still have the same end game.Rangers first always.The concept of the RST, especially given what we have been through in the past 16 months, should have grown massively.With the on line monsters we have created it will never work given the continued campaigns against individuals and general forum views, and I mean that going in both directions.Do you think one of the sides will back down? Neither do I.Self importance will always win on the day. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 I think he sells Pineapples in cans Does he say 'YES!'? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RST 19 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 If you're seriously telling us you "don't know" the FF poster with the username associated with Spanish tinned fruit, I'd have to say I don't believe you. Nothing you could say would convince me that you're telling the truth if that's what you're claiming.Of course I know him, he was on our Board until last October. He is not the guy though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resting in my account 231 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 I've only just got your cryptic clue and it is way off the mark.Way of the mark with what? He wasn't contacting various fans groups the night before Malcolm Murray was possibly being ousted? Or that he has worked on RST behalf in the past? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RST 19 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Way of the mark with what? He wasn't contacting various fans groups the night before Malcolm Murray was possibly being ousted? Or that he has worked on RST behalf in the past?See above. He is not the person I was talking about. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 That not the Dolmio man? Or the Milky Bar kid? No a bit more orange. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace 3,556 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 If you have a question to ask the RST, then they will have a stall/presence at EVERY home game. So, to all who are happy to call folks liars or suggest they are working to an agenda .... why don't you have a chat up close & personal like. Air your grievance, make your point in person & have a face to face discussion where nuance & inference, which can be lost in writing can be revealed by speech Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resting in my account 231 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 See above. He is not the person I was talking about.You are confusing me now dear. You agree he could be construed as an "activist" yes? He contacted various groups the night before the board meeting and day of idiotic statements, yes? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resting in my account 231 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 If you have a question to ask the RST, then they will have a stall/presence at EVERY home game. So, to all who are happy to call folks liars or suggest they are working to an agenda .... why don't you have a chat up close & personal like. Air your grievance, make your point in person & have a face to face discussion where nuance & inference, which can be lost in writing can be revealed by speechIf I suggested that to your members, it would constitute a threat eh. I shall locate said stall and ask politely, "Why not give the group credibility by removing the biggest cancer in the Rangers support? Then the Rangers family can support the Trust and help in its quest to give the supporters a voice".I shall expect answers Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 339 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 That's very clever Don't think it is though. This is one of the problems with the web, insinuations against people by people adding 2 & 2 and getting five. Wrong guy here I think. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RST 19 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 You are confusing me now dear. You agree he could be construed as an "activist" yes? He contacted various groups the night before the board meeting and day of idiotic statements, yes?It's not difficult. MFDM is not the person who contacted the RST regarding a statement. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.