What say the RST and pals?

[thehost 11,061]

.....

[The Dude 20,026]

by not taking them over long term.... no need for LM boca alexander etc... move em on

leave them training with the boys if need be

So move them on or let them rot? Hows does leaving them trainig with the youths bring the wage bill down drastically? Do you think we didn't try get rid of Goian & Boca last year? At the very least we managed to recoup a portion of each players wage. I'm almost certain if we could have sold them last year we would have.

[RFC Eagle 4,888]

It's an even stranger thing to be unable to grasp, however as you are prone to wondering I can confirm today is Tuesday, should set your mind at ease.

Are you suggesting that the £16.5 million did not take into account all the one off costs that have been mentioned on a number of occasions? There are nearly £4 million of these costs when you look below the headline.

'The interim results make no mention of sponsorship income, though the club notes in post balance sheet events it signed a contract with Puma to manufacture and provide replica strips and other Rangers branded products for season 2013/14.

The club also announced last Friday it had agreed a new shirt sponsorship deal with Blackthorn Cider for the 2013/14 season.

A further £3.72 million in operating losses include “acquisition expenses” totalling £609,000, and a further £284,000 cost is linked to “corporate structuring”.

The club also notes costs totalling £4.37 million “in relation to fund raising” which brought in a total of £34.5 million, meaning costs amounted to 12.6 per cent of the total raised.

A further £1.9 million is reported as “finance leases” though no further explanation is offered as to what these leases are for.'

http://www.business7...06408-23962723/

So £3.72 million are one off costs and thats without any sponsorship or shirt deal money. Its easy to average it out for a headline but in reality we aren't losing £1 million a month its just an average for the first 7 months.

[Carsons Dog 9,878]

Are you suggesting that the £16.5 million did not take into account all the one off costs thyat have been mentioned on a number of occasions? There are nearly £4 million of these costs when you look below the headline.

'The interim results make no mention of sponsorship income, though the club notes in post balance sheet events it signed a contract with Puma to manufacture and provide replica strips and other Rangers branded products for season 2013/14.

The club also announced last Friday it had agreed a new shirt sponsorship deal with Blackthorn Cider for the 2013/14 season.

A further £3.72 million in operating losses include “acquisition expenses” totalling £609,000, and a further £284,000 cost is linked to “corporate structuring”.

The club also notes costs totalling £4.37 million “in relation to fund raising” which brought in a total of £34.5 million, meaning costs amounted to 12.6 per cent of the total raised.

A further £1.9 million is reported as “finance leases” though no further explanation is offered as to what these leases are for.'

http://www.business7.co.uk/business-news/company-results-and-forecasts/2013/03/04/rangers-reports-7m-first-half-operating-loss-106408-23962723/

So £3.72 million are one off costs and thats without any sponsorship or shirt deal money. Its easy to average it out for a headline but in reality we aren't losing £1 million a month its just an average for the first 7 months.

He's peddling the Timmy lie that our losses are £1 million a month

Very strange

[allgers 735]

How many times has this came up, only to be knocked back.

[bawsburst 1,381]

Are you suggesting that the £16.5 million did not take into account all the one off costs that have been mentioned on a number of occasions? There are nearly £4 million of these costs when you look below the headline.

'The interim results make no mention of sponsorship income, though the club notes in post balance sheet events it signed a contract with Puma to manufacture and provide replica strips and other Rangers branded products for season 2013/14.

The club also announced last Friday it had agreed a new shirt sponsorship deal with Blackthorn Cider for the 2013/14 season.

A further £3.72 million in operating losses include “acquisition expenses” totalling £609,000, and a further £284,000 cost is linked to “corporate structuring”.

The club also notes costs totalling £4.37 million “in relation to fund raising” which brought in a total of £34.5 million, meaning costs amounted to 12.6 per cent of the total raised.

A further £1.9 million is reported as “finance leases” though no further explanation is offered as to what these leases are for.'

http://www.business7...06408-23962723/

So £3.72 million are one off costs and thats without any sponsorship or shirt deal money. Its easy to average it out for a headline but in reality we aren't losing £1 million a month its just an average for the first 7 months.

I will leave you to figure out how the balance sheet was worked, maybe the extra "paper revenue" threw you maybe not, I wonder what you and all is rosy in the garden brigade are going to make of the final figures in November which will show a major trading deficit, don't think about it maybe it will go away.

It also is prudent to take the date of the article into consideration and apply it.

"However, the club notes a pre-tax profit for the period of £9.5 million derived from a one-off accounting gain of £20.5 million linked to its revaluation of property and the brand value, unaudited results show".