Bothwellbear 1,392 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 The Rangers support saved the club and continue to keep it going and always will. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnyren 601 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 He will deal with your lot and Ibrox will be a better place for itMy lot ? And what lot is that ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Im not a Charles Green fan - but those who are suggesting that he and his consortium were not responsible for saving our club, along with a magnificent support - then you are engaging in revisionist history even the darkside would be proud of. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 The guy's an embarrassment.He's been back two days and it's already turning into the Charles Green show. Again....Funny how he returns once we've sold 34k season tickets. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,770 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Any buyer anywhere needed the fans backing.We very much helped keep the club alive but fact of the matter is without a buyer it didn't matter how many were willing to buy season tickets.With or without Charles we would've survived imo anyway. Remember Whyte had a massive say on who owned us. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
legalbeagle 3,734 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 If people are unwilling to give Charles the credit he deserves they are probably struggling to see the truth around the other bids that were put in.Craig Mather's statement yesterday said it all for me, there are too many 'Rangers men' who did nothing or not nearly enough when we needed them and who now seem to feel entitled to a say. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
legalbeagle 3,734 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 With or without Charles we would've survived imo anyway. Remember Whyte had a massive say on who owned us.No, he didn't, not at all. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted August 4, 2013 Author Share Posted August 4, 2013 With or without Charles we would've survived imo anyway. Remember Whyte had a massive say on who owned us.And this is the rewriting of history I refer to. Every single other bidder was a huge let down. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
legalbeagle 3,734 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 The guy's an embarrassment.He's been back two days and it's already turning into the Charles Green show. Again....Funny how he returns once we've sold 34k season tickets. Funny how Paul Murray returns when we've sold 34k season tickets. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Our club needed saving and it was saved, Green as the leader of the saving takes the bulk of credit.What is so hard to understand?He was brought in as the face, therefore whoever brought him in should earn the bulk of the credit. By your logic. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnyren 601 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Im not a Charles Green fan - but those who are suggesting that he and his consortium were not responsible for saving our club, along with a magnificent support - then you are engaging in revisionist history even the darkside would be proud of. Im with you on this d, but we have got to be selfish here, did he save us for our sake ? Or for his own ends? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,770 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Im not a Charles Green fan - but those who are suggesting that he and his consortium were not responsible for saving our club, along with a magnificent support - then you are engaging in revisionist history even the darkside would be proud of.I give him some credit however. Whyte made sure it was a one horse race. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Funny how Paul Murray returns when we've sold 34k season tickets.Paul Murray is a cunt, I wont deny that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted August 4, 2013 Author Share Posted August 4, 2013 Im not a Charles Green fan - but those who are suggesting that he and his consortium were not responsible for saving our club, along with a magnificent support - then you are engaging in revisionist history even the darkside would be proud of.Thank you D'Art, this is my main point. Irrespective of Green's merits now what he (and his group) did in purchasing us last year shouldn't be denied or downplayed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bothwellbear 1,392 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 And this is the rewriting of history I refer to. Every single other bidder was a huge let down.If he never came around then another group would have been chosen instead. The supporters remaining loyal saved the club. Charles Green did quite well but he is not the saviour. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Im with you on this d, but we have got to be selfish here, did he save us for our sake ? Or for his own ends?He saved us to make money - and he told us that as well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 He's another fucking arsepiece I want to have fuck all to do with the club.Charles green is in this for Charles green not Rangers FC. We know his consortium put the money up its done ffs. But his time his come and he should also find himself out of the club.Sick of the fucking lot of them right now tbhWhat's he even done wrong? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,770 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 No, he didn't, not at all.Of course he did he was not willing to sell his shares to anyone connected to PM Chaz said so himself Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
legalbeagle 3,734 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Of course he did he was not willing to sell his shares to anyone connected to PM Chaz said so himselfCG didn't need to buy his shares, and his agreement wasn't needed to sell the assets to the newco. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted August 4, 2013 Author Share Posted August 4, 2013 The guy's an embarrassment.He's been back two days and it's already turning into the Charles Green show. Again....Funny how he returns once we've sold 34k season tickets. Fair enough you view him like that, but do you agree with my general point that it's wrong to talk as if the club wasn't rescued by he and his group buying us? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
legalbeagle 3,734 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 If he never came around then another group would have been chosen instead. The supporters remaining loyal saved the club. Charles Green did quite well but he is not the saviour.Which other group? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted August 4, 2013 Author Share Posted August 4, 2013 Of course he did he was not willing to sell his shares to anyone connected to PM Chaz said so himselfActually Whyte did strike a deal with Kennedy and TBK iirc. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnyren 601 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 He saved us to make money - and he told us that as well.Fair enough , though i just hate how you said he saved us , i cant help thinking he would snigger if he heard that term Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,770 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 CG didn't need to buy his shares, and his agreement wasn't needed to sell the assets to the newco.He went for a CVA so of course he needed his shares. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted August 4, 2013 Author Share Posted August 4, 2013 What's he even done wrong?I didn't find the interview that's caused all this especially harmful apart from maybe poor timing, but Ally's reaction has obviously turned a fair few. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.