Straight-Edge-Loyal 6,696 Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 Can we have Fury and ED back now this has ended then? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehost 11,061 Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 Surely not 'hush hush' from their members?very much kept from their membersbe interesting to see who is waltzing into that meeting in EKsly doesnt even begin to describe these "rangers folk" Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehost 11,061 Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 I'm told there's a few unhappy propagandists and unelected fans reps kicking about EK. These idiots have been used and done up like a kipper by Mini and now the reputations of some fans spokespeople lie in tatters.They were warned, they didn't listen, they continued to attack everyone and anyone from the present board to fellow Gers fans.All for nothing by the looks of it.what reputation Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarkev 3,540 Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 The sun in absolute nonsense shocker! It still amazes me so many of you still judge people or form opinions based on what these rags print! Yesterday we had at least 3 or 4 people demanding the guy who attacked the dog be locked up without any evidence other than "if it made the papers there must be some truth in it"...,that's what we are up against! Bottom feeders loyal! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,256 Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 I'm confused as to the line 'no new directors have been appointed save those recently announced'Recently announced was Frank and John, but free club have said they are not? Who do they mean then? One of the Easdales?I don't see it very clear either and the club statement also confuses me with the last four words 'save those recentally appointed'.Does this mean that the recentally appointed are the four additional non exec directors (FB, SE, JM and PM) as previously requested? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrongshapedballs 78 Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 I don't see it very clear either and the club statement also confuses me with the last four words 'save those recentally appointed'.That is not what the club statement says, it says:"The Company confirms that all of the current Directors remain in office and that it is not appointing any additional Directors save that as previously announced, the Company confirms that it continues to actively seek to appoint a new Chairman." Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,256 Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 That is not what the club statement says, it says:"The Company confirms that all of the current Directors remain in office and that it is not appointing any additional Directors save that as previously announced, the Company confirms that it continues to actively seek to appoint a new Chairman."Sorry your correct but surely 'save that as previously announced' means that the same thing i.e. the four or only the two (FB & PM) were appointed ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 Sorry your correct but surely 'save that as previously announced' means that the same thing i.e. the four or only the two (FB & PM) were appointed ?No, the statement says "The Company confirms that all of the current Directors remain in office and that it is not appointing any additional Directors save that as previously announced, the Company confirms that it continues to actively seek to appoint a new Chairman."The italics and the bolded bit are different parts of the same sentence. They're not appointing anyone new, except for a new Chairman if and when they find one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrongshapedballs 78 Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 No, it means that they previously announced that they are looking for a Chairman. A comma between 'that' and 'as' would have made it clearer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,256 Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 Thanks for the replies, it makes sense now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,647 Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 Tear the sun up and rip it in shreds along with the rest of the rags, they are yesterdays news in fact they are full of absolute crap and are only for people who believe that dugs are stoopit enough to wear bheggar strips ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theiconicman 2,992 Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 , send fairly clear now. Must not have my coffee when I read that! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.