SoldierBlue1 499 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Is there any chance of seeing minutes and names of those persons on these working parties? WATP Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky True Legend 2,682 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 So Malvern now wants to bring in censorship of opinions. Please leave that to FF. If you are not open to people not agreeing with you, don't post. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iang2911 423 Posted February 18, 2014 Author Share Posted February 18, 2014 Is there any chance of seeing minutes and names of those persons on these working parties? WATPIt has been proposed that those involved in the working parties sign a charter. I will push for This to be published Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 So Malvern now wants to bring in censorship of opinions. Please leave that to FF. If you are not open to people not agreeing with you, don't post.No I do not, but I would like to see all groups FULL membership poll before the select few decide for the many in any action (please don't tell me ££ do I will die laughing).Not much to ask really, maybe also there is a case for stability as most of the associations schemes hold less than a minor percentage of the Rangers supporters, maybe they could try engaging in the debate with the majority and not the minority.Still much like the Scottish Nazi Party some groups see things the way they are in their view.I am willing to hope this works out but those involved in the past are not going to be viewed well by the bears who have not joined up for those very reasons Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 54,266 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Sportingintegritymyarse. The problem is that different people have different ideas as to what is best for Rangers. I too would love to see our support united but regret that I may not see it in my lifetime after recent events. By the way, think your username is top class.Fair enough.I think when we cant even get 100000 bears to sign a petition it shows the apathy in our support.On top of that there are plenty who gurn about the divisions in our support but seem to revel in this rather than contribute to the greater good.I have no idea if this will work. But doing nothing certainly wont.Glad you like my username. Quite fancy it as a wee deed poll change to my surname.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iang2911 423 Posted February 18, 2014 Author Share Posted February 18, 2014 I'll reiterate what I said on Rangers chat Ian, from what we were told by your namesake on the Rangers Chat show (who was very positive about this scheme and I applaud his efforts and time for going) that I still believe we have to have a cease and desist order on all the sniping and in infighting within the groups with the club (even for a short period of time) for this to have a basis to set a sound footing on.I personally would love this to be a vehicle for bringing us together but some of the names mentioned tonight fill me with dread and doubt. Unless we will move on as one then there will be no going forward and talks of protests, removing season ticket sales or calls for answers from the board before they have to are out of order.Still will await for any developments on this initiative and will try and be optimistic to a degree.There was certainly some heated moments tonight but the one thing the VAST majority agreed with was unity is a must. Rangers First optimises that sentiment. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WATP_Greg 5 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Minutes will be posted on the site when it is live - the minutes from the first meeting is 11 pages :O Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 There was certainly some heated moments tonight but the one thing the VAST majority agreed with was unity is a must. Rangers First optimises that sentiment.We all want the Same thing Ian, some have just been bitten on the ars3 too many times but as I said to you before, I hope your plans pan out and this can happen, I will certainly back them 100% if it is what occurs.My concern is the interim period between the ceasefire of the opposing sides and the signing of the armistice as to what happens, I do not foresee too many positives hence my "temp ceasefire" proposal so gallantly shot down by Corky (just for you Corky, that's not a compliment to you, read the sig). Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bheast Skelper 411 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 I'll reiterate what I said on Rangers chat Ian, from what we were told by your namesake on the Rangers Chat show (who was very positive about this scheme and I applaud his efforts and time for going) that I still believe we have to have a cease and desist order on all the sniping and in infighting within the groups with the club (even for a short period of time) for this to have a basis to set a sound footing on.I personally would love this to be a vehicle for bringing us together but some of the names mentioned tonight fill me with dread and doubt. Unless we will move on as one then there will be no going forward and talks of protests, removing season ticket sales or calls for answers from the board before they have to are out of order.Still will await for any developments on this initiative and will try and be optimistic to a degree.What names have been mentioned Malv?For once I didn't listen to Rangers Chat tonight so I missed all this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 What names have been mentioned Malv?For once I didn't listen to Rangers Chat tonight so I missed all this.Christine and Drew from some organisation, along with a certain member of the SoS. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Christine and Drew from some organisation, along with a certain member of the SoS.Basically status quo then The RST, RSA, TBo, UBS, SOS don't really need to come together under a rangers first umbrella as they all sing from the same hymn sheet I like the op Iain he means well but tbh this is starting to fill me with dread but happy to get more info before making my mind up completely Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky True Legend 2,682 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Malvern. You said a cease and desist order. Does this also apply to rea et al or are they exempt? Sorry, but to me this stinks of censorship. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Christene? The same one thats been banned from here twice? Drew robertson? Was he not one of the guys advocating a boycot of season tickets?Ugh. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Straight-Edge-Loyal 6,696 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Sportingintegritymyarse. The problem is that different people have different ideas as to what is best for Rangers. I too would love to see our support united but regret that I may not see it in my lifetime after recent events. By the way, think your username is top class.I.agree with you so much depends on finding unity for our long term future but i wholy dont think fan ownership is the.way to go about it Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stu43rigger 327 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Basically status quo thenThe RST, RSA, TBo, UBS, SOS don't really need to come together under a rangers first umbrella as they all sing from the same hymn sheetI like the op Iain he means well but tbh this is starting to fill me with dread but happy to get more info before making my mind up completelyspot on, once again a potentially great idea is being hijacked by those groups who have failed the fans so consistently in the past, if anyone linked to rst sos rsa and whoever else it will deter a chunk of the support which would be a shame Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WATP_Greg 5 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Christine and Drew from some organisation, along with a certain member of the SoS.Christine and Drew were representing RST there - I think I will leave it to others to describe their attitude towards the CIC...They were complaining of a lack of support from SDEdit: I should add that I feel SD have been entirely professional in everything to do with this, I have been impressed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Straight-Edge-Loyal 6,696 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Sportingintegritymyarse. The problem is that different people have different ideas as to what is best for Rangers. I too would love to see our support united but regret that I may not see it in my lifetime after recent events. By the way, think your username is top class.I.agree with you so much depends on finding unity for our long term future but i wholy dont think fan ownership is the.way to go about it Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iang2911 423 Posted February 19, 2014 Author Share Posted February 19, 2014 Basically status quo then The RST, RSA, TBo, UBS, SOS don't really need to come together under a rangers first umbrella as they all sing from the same hymn sheet I like the op Iain he means well but tbh this is starting to fill me with dread but happy to get more info before making my mind up completelyWait for theinutea of tonight's meeting guys. Youay be surprised. I will also discuss in more detail with 1st jan tomorrow. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iang2911 423 Posted February 19, 2014 Author Share Posted February 19, 2014 Christene? The same one thats been banned from here twice? Drew robertson? Was he not one of the guys advocating a boycot of season tickets?Ugh.All I will say is. They were there. Wait for the minutes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WATP_Greg 5 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 There is minutes of the meeting taken by someone at the meeting tonight that are up on FF - I can't copy and paste on here (for whatever reason)Edit: not official minutes but covers broad points Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Wait for theinutea of tonight's meeting guys. Youay be surprised. I will also discuss in more detail with 1st jan tomorrow.Sound mate cheers Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iang2911 423 Posted February 19, 2014 Author Share Posted February 19, 2014 I.agree with you so much depends on finding unity for our long term future but i wholy dont think fan ownership is the.way to go about itThere are many different forms that fan ownership/representation can take. Please wait for the final strategy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 All I will say is. They were there. Wait for the minutes.fair play mate. I misunderstood, thought someone was saying they were actively involved. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iang2911 423 Posted February 19, 2014 Author Share Posted February 19, 2014 spot on, once again a potentially great idea is being hijacked by those groups who have failed the fans so consistently in the past, if anyone linked to rst sos rsa and whoever else it will deter a chunk of the support which would be a shameNo hijacking has taken place guys. Please wait and see Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iang2911 423 Posted February 19, 2014 Author Share Posted February 19, 2014 Sound mate cheersFckn spelling in that quote is atrocious. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.