Virtuoso 27,180 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 The original statement from the Ulster Bears which was posted above by Dennistoun Rangers was chopped on FF.Why ? Does anyone have any idea why FF Admin would chop such a statement?According to this thread, it apparently sounded like a 'VB stance' Obviously didn't sit well with Dingwall as Mark has to be in control. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 I'm starting to think the vicious clique are seeing VB here, there and everywhere. They honestly thought the RTID NI statement was VB like?You should be flattered - it's an excellent statement Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 I'm starting to think the vicious clique are seeing VB here, there and everywhere. They honestly thought the RTID NI statement was VB like?I said similar yesterdayThey have changed direction dramatically now they see a) More people trusting RF as an investment model as opposed to theirs and b) People eventually realising that VB are the only group fighting for Rangers regardless of who is in the boardroom - without fear or favourThey are being marginalised yet they still have the problem child with his hand on the tillerUntil that changes they will continue to become irrelevantSuch a waste of a good idea all because people don't have the balls to stand up to the poisonous clique Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 R.T.I.D NI First we would like to thank the R.F.F.F for the response to our concerns re any use of the fund. We have been assured and we are satisfied completely that any use of funds held by the R.F.F.F shall be used only when the fanbase are consulted on the matter.We also ask that any ideas fans have on the way it should be used are passed by E mail to the committee of the R.F.F.F Thank you all for your input and your support.Committee R.T.I.D. NI Tbh that's still not good enough as the fanbase consulted will mean the union of fannies who would say yes anyway No consultation ever on this Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskbankloyal 19,446 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 Tbh that's still not good enough as the fanbase consulted will mean the union of fannies who would say yes anyway No consultation ever on thisI haven't seen anybody other than the RFFF committee member suggest this as an idea. You are shit stirring. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 I agree, but find it incredible the statement was chopped from a so called Rangers fans forum because they thought it came from other Rangers fans. No wonder they are so unpopular with the Bears.I'm guessing FF? Did they really chop that statement? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskbankloyal 19,446 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 I'm guessing FF? Did they really chop that statement? That's embarrassing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 FF have lost the plot if they are chopping statements like this the place has become a parody of itself. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 That's embarrassing.If true, then it really is. The only motivation I can think of is pure censorship in a bid to hide the fact that some people are opposed to using the RFFF for legal fees for an individual fan. Incredible if that is the case. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 I haven't seen anybody other than the RFFF committee member suggest this as an idea. You are shit stirring. You are missing my point Well done Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskbankloyal 19,446 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 If true, then it really is. The only motivation I can think of is pure censorship in a bid to hide the fact that some people are opposed to using the RFFF for legal fees for an individual fan. Incredible if that is the case.Given that the official FF twitter account also stated earlier it shouldn't be used for SoS & opened a discussion about what the money should be used for I'm not even sure that's the case. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskbankloyal 19,446 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 You are missing my point Well doneNo I didn't. You said the UoF would say yes to the RFFF money being used that way. That is false & IMO shit stirring. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 No I didn't. You said the UoF would say yes to the RFFF money being used that way. That is false & IMO shit stirring.I think a lot of them would The bigger point I was making (that your missing) is that no fan groups should be consulted on how the money is spent especially with their track records recently and especially as they don't speak for me I gave my money to Rangers not the union of fannies who might decide how my money gets spent Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kplfishtank 4,657 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 this whole episode has come up because certain individuals couldnt keep their mouths shut, position in RFFF should be untenable Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virtuoso 27,180 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 I'm guessing FF? Did they really chop that statement? FF have lost the plot if they are chopping statements like this the place has become a parody of itself.According to Kim Jong Dingwall, it was chopped because:Chopped because it was tendentious' date=' mendacious and mince. [/quote']As has been pointed out, Mark has to be in control. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Army 4,146 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 According to Kim Jong Dingwall, it was chopped because:As has been pointed out, Mark has to be in control.Anyone remotely surprised by the actions of the e-mail hacking, Cyber bully needs to get out more.He should maybe stick to posting names and pictures of bears on his site for the benefit of the bheasts who infest it Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 Anyone remotely surprised by the actions of the e-mail hacking, Cyber bully needs to get out more.He should maybe stick to posting names and pictures of bears on his site for the benefit of the bheasts who infest itHopefully the RST will have the balls to distance themselves from the fat controller and FF in the futureTheir reputation would soar if they did Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 Shouldn't be shocked by Herr Dingwalls actions in deleting a great statement but this is low even for him. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.