SeparateEntityMyArse 53,893 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Care to point out where i called anyone a scumbag?BMR appears to have. I asked whether this was the case.You appear not to have even remarked on the content of the article, but have jumped in in what appears to be defence of one of your gang.So is it the case in your opinion that the VB is a scumbag as BMR suggests but hasn't replied to? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siam69 27,050 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 BMR appears to have. I asked whether this was the case.You appear not to have even remarked on the content of the article, but have jumped in in what appears to be defence of one of your gang.So is it the case in your opinion that the VB is a scumbag as BMR suggests but hasn't replied to?Well, seeing as it was BMR who said it, you'd be best asking him if that was the case. I haven't called anyone a scumbag. Do you think he is a scumbag?Defence of one of my gang? Who or what is my gang?Obviously comphrension is not your strong point, i never called anyone a scumbag, although it is my opinion that people's children should not be named on the net.I think he was wrong for doing it, for what, the terrible supposed crime of voting yes, likewise i think it was wrong for the the VB member's child/children to have been named online. But scumbag, no, i don't even know him. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 I've seen a member of VB cracking up on here and threatening to go to front doors because his children were named on the net.Then the VB's name a guy's kid online for what, the terrible crime of supposedly voting yes Neither should have been named on the net IMO. it's nothing to do with voting mate Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted E Bayer 484 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Still not a single thing in the papers about any of this...... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B1872 20,862 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 What's the email address to send complaints to HMRC about their staff? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,893 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Well, seeing as it was BMR who said it, you'd be best asking him if that was the case. I haven't called anyone a scumbag. Do you think he is a scumbag?Defence of one of my gang? Who or what is my gang?Obviously comphrension is not your strong point, i never called anyone a scumbag, although it is my opinion that people's children should not be named on the net.I think he was wrong for doing it, for what, the terrible supposed crime of voting yes, likewise i think it was wrong for the the VB member's child/children to have been named online. But scumbag, no, i don't even know him.I comprehend fine that I posed questions. I did not accuse you, though maybe hit a raw nerve given your tetchy response. And if you peruse a few posts back you'll see I did ask BMR - following which you appear to correlate a Rangers fans leader naming a Rangers supporting VBs name, address, workplace, family members and socialising haunts with this.And no I dont think the author is a scumbag. I thought you would be able to comprehend that from the like I gave on #1. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spectre 1,663 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 This!Evidence is there so do something about it.They'll probably be in charge of each others disciplinary. Civil service across the board is an absolute nepotistic joke. 21 year old managers with no work experience but a maw that's a manager in another part of the business Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennistoun Rangers 426 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 I've seen a member of VB cracking up on here and threatening to go to front doors because his children were named on the net.Then the VB's name a guy's kid online for what, the terrible crime of supposedly voting yes Neither should have been named on the net IMO.Said VB member is known to the Bheast and is no doubt a target for them however the fact it was Fan Spivs masquerading as fellow Bears that named him I am sure most folk could appreciate his anger. Gives you a chance for a wee pop though, I know who I would want standing beside me Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted E Bayer 484 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 They'll probably be in charge of each others disciplinary. Civil service across the board is an absolute nepotistic joke. 21 year old managers with no work experience but a maw that's a manager in another part of the businessEh? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WadeWilson 4,670 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Are you calling the author of this article a "scumbag"?Was it he who dragged someone's kids into it and posted their name on the Internet?Also, do said kids have anything to do with HMRC or the actual supposed point of the articles? Or is it now about demonsing Yes voters too?I'm a Rangers fan too... But I'm a human being first. This may be difficult for some on the Internet to comprehend, I know. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,893 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Was it he who dragged someone's kids into it and posted their name on the Internet?Also, do said kids have anything to do with HMRC or the actual supposed point of the articles? Or is it now about demonsing Yes voters too?I'm a Rangers fan too... But I'm a human being first. This may be difficult for some on the Internet to comprehend, I know.So you believe he is the scumbag you alluded to earlier but dont even have the gumption to come out and state just that.Pretty scummy act calling other bears scumbags imo. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,612 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Was it he who dragged someone's kids into it and posted their name on the Internet?Also, do said kids have anything to do with HMRC or the actual supposed point of the articles? Or is it now about demonsing Yes voters too?I'm a Rangers fan too... But I'm a human being first. This may be difficult for some on the Internet to comprehend, I know.VicTim card Activated. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WadeWilson 4,670 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 So you believe he is the scumbag you alluded to earlier but dont even have the gumption to come out and state just that.Pretty scummy act calling other bears scumbags imo.More pointless trolling of a thread from you... ZzZzZzzz... I will state that you are a stirring wee sweetiewife. Hope that helps. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather 72,255 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 So you believe he is the scumbag you alluded to earlier but dont even have the gumption to come out and state just that.Pretty scummy act calling other bears scumbags imo.Doubt it's a bear tbh Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,682 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Doubt it's a bear tbhThis ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WadeWilson 4,670 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 VicTim card Activated.Hi, troll number 2. Someone should probably steer the topic back onto the zombie weirdos who work for HMRC now.I have said my piece and I believe I was correct in criticising something immoral and absolutely nothing will change my mind or alter my moral code or ever make me feel I was wrong to exercise my freedom of speech. Stick to telling us your own opinion as you won't change mine.Thanks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WadeWilson 4,670 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Doubt it's a bear tbh"Rangers fan, my arse...?"Grow up. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rfc#1. 1,877 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Tbh i don't have any problem about naming the prick but at the same time i don't understand the need for his kids names to be there.I wont lose lose any sleep over it though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WadeWilson 4,670 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 I'll let the seething hyenas in this thread get on with gnashing their teeth about someone's opinion on an Internet forum.It's a lovely summer's day. Life is too short for hate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WadeWilson 4,670 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Tbh i don't have any problem about naming the prick but at the same time i don't understand the need for his kids names to be there.I wont lose lose any sleep over it though.Exactly my point. They should just edit that part out and there would be no need to lose the moral high ground. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,893 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 More pointless trolling of a thread from you... ZzZzZzzz... I will state that you are a stirring wee sweetiewife. Hope that helps. Would rather be a trolling sweetie wife than a bear who alludes to another bear being a scumbag but doesnt even have the balls to state it directly.Would help if you were a bheggar rather than a bear acting like one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,893 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Doubt it's a bear tbhOnly thing worse than a mhank is a bear who behaves like a mhank. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluefarm 1,055 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 I've seen a member of VB cracking up on here and threatening to go to front doors because his children were named on the net.Then the VB's name a guy's kid online for what, the terrible crime of supposedly voting yes Neither should have been named on the net IMO.I left my previous post long enough for the blazer chasers to read it. No messing next time - you have been told in person and on here. I am a member of VB, but not admin. There's the difference, but your hatred doesn't get it.You post my kids names - the consequences will be swift. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cushynumber 25,178 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siam69 27,050 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 It shows you how much hatred you have for VB. I am not a VB admin member, it was my kids who's names were posted and I will go through the scum's door if they do so again. I don't agree with that article, so stop talking shit as usual.Your little gang of Blazer chasers have been told in no uncertain terms what's going to happen if they target my kids ever again. My son was 11 years old when the Blazer chasers named him. It may well happen again for some odd reason, but when it does, those involved, better fully understand the consequences.There will be no more internet squabbles when your mates do it again - believe me. From Greenock to Linwood to Lenzie, every name is known. They can use as many aliases on FF as they like, it's too late to hide. I know who was involved and I fully intend having a chat.In the post you quoted I did say naming people's kids was wrong, maybe you missed it.I have no idea who you're talking about, when you're naming places and supposed 'gangs' and my 'mates', I really don't. But maybe the hatred you refer to is clouding your thoughts.So, in summary, what I said was I don't agree with naming people's kids online, whether yours, or in the said article, which you seem to agree with. Everything else you just posted is nothing to do with me in the slightest, but apparently it's me that's talking shite lol.You crack on there if you want, i'm just happy enough that we both agree that people's kids shouldn't be named, as they really shouldn't.Cheers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.