The Dude 20,026 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 2 minutes ago, Howsitgoing said: Rangers said that 38 games is a must, that is the only source that I’m paying any attention too. Looks like they are going to fail in this attempt just as they have in trying to bastardise the rules, what do you think their third attempt is going to look like? So one of my sources didn't rubbish it as you claimed then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howsitgoing 4,281 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 Just now, The Dude said: So one of my sources didn't rubbish it as you claimed then? Irrelevant, what’s there third attempt going to be? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 Just now, Howsitgoing said: Irrelevant, what’s there third attempt going to be? No, not irrelevant at all. Not one of my sources have 'rubbished' it. There probably won't be a third. This one will likely go through. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,777 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 5 minutes ago, The Dude said: Its not an 'interpretation' it's pretty black and white that's what the AofA say. "League position, as determined in accordance with the rules..." Its the league positions as determined in accordance with the rules. Not the league position at the end of the season in accordance with the rules. Champions club specified at the end of the season. This payment to clubs doesnt specify league positions at the end of the season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howsitgoing 4,281 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 Just now, The Dude said: No, not irrelevant at all. Not one of my sources have 'rubbished' it. There probably won't be a third. This one will likely go through. Your just fishing now, I’m not biting. This one has less chance going through than the bastardised rules did. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prso's headband 35,513 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 No surprise that the most simple option benefits just about every club in Scotland bar one. No surprise the clubs are being subjected to blackmail to suit the agenda of one club when 41 others lose out, some a whole lot more than most Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaiserJon 12,404 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 1 minute ago, Howsitgoing said: Your just fishing now, I’m not biting. This one has less chance going through than the bastardised rules did. He should have his own sub forum where he can argue with himself. Hot topics like you say black I say white or some such nonsense.☺️ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 1 minute ago, Howsitgoing said: Your just fishing now, I’m not biting. This one has less chance going through than the bastardised rules did. Not fishing at all. You made a demonstrably bullshit claim. A couple of mods had my source named to them and will be able to confirm if theyve since 'rubbished it' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 2 minutes ago, The Dude said: Not fishing at all. You made a demonstrably bullshit claim. A couple of mods had my source named to them and will be able to confirm if theyve since 'rubbished it' I think you are an ugly ,ill ....... despicable cockroach of a guy . The only time you rep someone is when they agree with you , when 3/4 are haranguing you for being the prick you are Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,777 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howsitgoing 4,281 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 Just now, The Dude said: Not fishing at all. You made a demonstrably bullshit claim. A couple of mods had my source named to them and will be able to confirm if theyve since 'rubbished it' I never rubbished your source, I rubbished the information that your source gave to you. Your source and you need to tread more carefully on where you get your information because like it or not the govern body of Scottish football with there placed chairman at spfl level aren’t to be trusted. You and your source needs to take more heed in that. Rangers lawyers are more reliable than Murdoch MacLennan and should be giving a lot more credence than anything that corrupt bastards want you to believe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 Just now, SeparateEntityMyArse said: Interesting Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 1 minute ago, Howsitgoing said: I never rubbished your source, I rubbished the information that your source gave to you. Your source and you need to tread more carefully on where you get your information because like it or not the govern body of Scottish football with there placed chairman at spfl level aren’t to be trusted. You and your source needs to take more heed in that. Rangers lawyers are more reliable than Murdoch MacLennan and should be giving a lot more credence than anything that corrupt bastards want you to believe. You literally said "You was too quick to believe this information and that’s evidential on the fact that one of your sources has rubbished it." So who is my source that rubbished it? Can you even name the clubs my sources are at? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,777 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 19 minutes ago, The Dude said: Looks like Ayr are voting for it Only fair resolution is nul and void. Nul and void he says. What's in the papers that dictates that's not possible and cant be an option? Something doesnt add up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 1 minute ago, Howsitgoing said: I never rubbished your source, I rubbished the information that your source gave to you. Your source and you need to tread more carefully on where you get your information because like it or not the govern body of Scottish football with there placed chairman at spfl level aren’t to be trusted. You and your source needs to take more heed in that. Rangers lawyers are more reliable than Murdoch MacLennan and should be giving a lot more credence than anything that corrupt bastards want you to believe. source Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 1 minute ago, eejay the dj said: Interesting 3 minutes ago, eejay the dj said: I think you are an ugly ,ill ....... despicable cockroach of a guy . The only time you rep someone is when they agree with you , when 3/4 are haranguing you for being the prick you are Here you go with my looks again. Easy when you hide behind anonymity on the internet I suppose. You keep track of my reps now you fucking weirdo? 😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 2 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: Only fair resolution is nul and void. Nul and void he says. What's in the papers that dictates that's not possible and cant be an option? Something doesnt add up. Breach of commercial deals most likely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howsitgoing 4,281 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 1 minute ago, The Dude said: You literally said "You was too quick to believe this information and that’s evidential on the fact that one of your sources has rubbished it." So who is my source that rubbished it? Can you even name the clubs my sources are at? I’ve just replied, your source if he didn’t rubbish it , is like you, hoodwinked by a govern body set up for one purpose, the betterment of their fenian football team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 30,918 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 4 minutes ago, eejay the dj said: Interesting I'm telling you mate, the statement was good. It was most defo a statement of intent. One made to sway the masses in our favour. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 2 minutes ago, Howsitgoing said: I’ve just replied, your source if he didn’t rubbish it , is like you, hoodwinked by a govern body set up for one purpose, the betterment of their fenian football team. Hoodwinked by confirming thats what the SPFL's position was? The same one he called 'self interest' and said he'd be 'furious' if it went ahead? I mean, he definitely sounds like he's been hoodwinked. “We’d be furious if that happened. The current plan comes down to there being no creative thinking at the SPFL, self-interest driving decisions and looking at rules that weren’t written for these circumstances and I think that it is unacceptable. “It could end up in a legal row, I’m not sure we would go down the legal route, unless there was some sort of collective action, but I don’t think all the individual clubs will have the resources to fight it through the courts. “You might see some sort of banding together of clubs that all feel aggrieved in that situation though. You’ll also have individual clubs who will take their own action. “It just feels like the wrong answer to the questions that we’re facing. "There’s a general feeling that good, constructive solutions being put forward but are being squashed without any real debate. They are being squashed by a handful of people without proper discussion with the rest of the clubs. “If the consensus with clubs is that it’s the right thing to do, then fine, but what is the consensus? I’m not sure we’re being properly consulted on those potential solutions and that needs to happen." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,777 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 11 minutes ago, The Dude said: Breach of commercial deals most likely. So we terminate the season early by PPG, dont play the games, and the deals are fulfilled. We terminate the season early nul and void, we dont play the games, and the deals are breached. I'd have thought no of games more relevant than how the season was concluded. Unless we know what the clubs know and are basing decisions on we're all guessing tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris182 6,310 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 So 4 clubs need to vote against it in Premiership, or three in either the Championship, League One or League Two? Us, Hearts and Aberdeen (potentially). Need one more Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howsitgoing 4,281 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 2 minutes ago, The Dude said: Hoodwinked by confirming thats what the SPFL's position was? The same one he called 'self interest' and said he'd be 'furious' if it went ahead? I mean, he definitely sounds like he's been hoodwinked. “We’d be furious if that happened. The current plan comes down to there being no creative thinking at the SPFL, self-interest driving decisions and looking at rules that weren’t written for these circumstances and I think that it is unacceptable. “It could end up in a legal row, I’m not sure we would go down the legal route, unless there was some sort of collective action, but I don’t think all the individual clubs will have the resources to fight it through the courts. “You might see some sort of banding together of clubs that all feel aggrieved in that situation though. You’ll also have individual clubs who will take their own action. “It just feels like the wrong answer to the questions that we’re facing. "There’s a general feeling that good, constructive solutions being put forward but are being squashed without any real debate. They are being squashed by a handful of people without proper discussion with the rest of the clubs. “If the consensus with clubs is that it’s the right thing to do, then fine, but what is the consensus? I’m not sure we’re being properly consulted on those potential solutions and that needs to happen." Agree with everything you said there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 1 minute ago, Howsitgoing said: Agree with everything you said there. Wasn't me, it was my hoodwinked, 'fenian' source who said it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 3 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: So we terminate the season early by PPG, dont play the games, and the deals are fulfilled. We terminate the season early nul and void, we dont play the games, and the deals are breached. I'd have thought no of games more relevant than how the season was concluded. Unless we know what the clubs know and are basing decisions on we're all guessing tbh. Basing it on previous concerns that were put to me by clubs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.4f276fee3cffb56e2b865512f54b1ad4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.