CooperSF 5,792 Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Papaguy, you should have a wee commitee who discuss the decisions, even if its only a quick "aye it was awful mate" via pm. I nominate me for the commitee. Here Here Good Idea Wants in commitee Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricksen_da_best 2,034 Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Phil O Donnels wifes Brother eh.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooperSF 5,792 Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Phil O Donnels wifes Brother eh.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted August 10, 2008 Author Share Posted August 10, 2008 Phil O Donnels wifes Brother eh.. Wrong thread! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted August 10, 2008 Author Share Posted August 10, 2008 Papaguy, you should have a wee commitee who discuss the decisions, even if its only a quick "aye it was awful mate" via pm. I nominate me for the commitee. Here Here Good Idea Wants in commitee Great idea, like an 'Unbias RangersMedia Decisions Panel' Say...Kev, Foxy, Myself and Davy? Since this is the brainchild of our wild deliberations? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricksen_da_best 2,034 Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Phil O Donnels wifes Brother eh.. Wrong thread! he was the ref Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricksen_da_best 2,034 Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Papaguy, you should have a wee commitee who discuss the decisions, even if its only a quick "aye it was awful mate" via pm. I nominate me for the commitee. Here Here Good Idea Wants in commitee Great idea, like an 'Unbias RangersMedia Decisions Panel' Say...Kev, Foxy, Myself and Davy? Since this is the brainchild of our wild deliberations? ill be the manager Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
evenstevens 903 Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Brilliant - great idea ruined already by page 2 of the thread. THIS IS A VALID EXPERIMENT AND ONE WE NEED TO ENSURE IS NOT CHEAPENED BY LITTLE COMMENTS ALL THE TIME! Admin, CR, whoever - validate the experiment by closing (pre-modding) this to cheap looking comments that will only belittle what is trying to be achieved! Please! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy 69 Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Nice one Papa . Will be very interesting to see how this turns out . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertsovich 0 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 this wont work because of biastniss cause celtic probably should have had a penalty just before it with hesselink and the keeper Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
evenstevens 903 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 this wont work because of biastniss cause celtic probably should have had a penalty just before it with hesselink and the keeper That's it - will we look at decisions NOT given for both sides, as well as the ones given?? Eg - if Falkirk had NOT been given the penalty yesterday and Rangers had scored the goal that we did, would the RM experiment have called it a draw? Had Celtic NOT been awarded the penalty yesterday, would it have been called a draw. St Mirren or Celtic could still have won the game given it was 60 mins. Not saying this isn't a great idea but it is absolutely NOT a predictor for what a game would have turned out to be. Our game on Sunday is the perfect example, there is no guarantee we would have equalised had Falkirk scored their penalty - but if it had NOT been awarded there is a possibility RM would have viewed it as a decision in Rangers favour from refs and considered us to be 1-0 down, but scoring a goal would have made it a draw. Difficult to work points out based on decisions, but defo valid to count decisions that are wrong. Graeme Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the goal machine 7,810 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 http://www.rightresult.net/ Premiership version. Everton should have got CL football Great idea though PG51. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooperSF 5,792 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 Papaguy, you should have a wee commitee who discuss the decisions, even if its only a quick "aye it was awful mate" via pm. I nominate me for the commitee. Here Here Good Idea Wants in commitee Great idea, like an 'Unbias RangersMedia Decisions Panel' Say...Kev, Foxy, Myself and Davy? Since this is the brainchild of our wild deliberations? Sounds like a plan p.s. "Foxy".... I'm liking it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy 69 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 this wont work because of biastniss cause celtic probably should have had a penalty just before it with hesselink and the keeper This wont be 100% accurate at all . but some decisions could determine who wins and who loses a match Say for instance a dodgy penalty is awarded in the 1st minute . And the team ends up winning 1-0 because of it . What will you do , account it as a draw ? still another 89 minutes to play and coulda have scored had the penalty never happened. ^^ Things will happen . it wont be 100% accurate. But it will give us an idea of the amount of errors made by referees in matches involving the Old Firm, For and Against . Watp Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markag1991 6 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 Good idea!! The ref's have to be biast with the Old Firm when you see some of the decisions givin! Paper's said today that the ref winked at Gus MCPherson when the penalty was givin!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest therabbitt Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 Give me a shout if you guys want a hand - seems a great idea Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 I think it is interesting because it may show NO bias - or that it DOEAS even out well worth a go. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_RFC87 761 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 Who's to say Celtic wouldn't have went on to win the game if they never got the penalty? This assume the game stops at that scoreline and regardless of how long is left. Thus, it's going to be full of errors and a pointless effort with no other outcome than spreading paranoia. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speuan 1 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 yeah but if we lose a goal due to a wrong decision then this should balance out also. no ifs or but about what would have happened, only wrong goals, Sendings off I reckon should have its own tally though, as would be hard to justify a points deduction. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 I don't like this thread one bit. There have been signs of us becoming like paranoid timmy in the past 2 or 3 seasons. This is the final nail in the coffin. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Briton 394 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 What a totally ludicrous idea...WTF pinned it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOLUWDC 1 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 just read on BBC that in the last 6 games at Parkhead, 6 players have been sent off. And none of them have been for Celtic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted August 11, 2008 Author Share Posted August 11, 2008 Too many people moaning about paranoia etc. You're not getting the point! I want to see if there really is a bias in terms of refs getting 'questionable decisions' wrong in favour of the big two, either Rangers or Celtic. It's not an experiment to look at how big bad Celtic get all the decisions. All I'm saying is that it will be very interesting to see how many wrong decisions each ref gives in favour of the Old Firm, the league table is just a bit of fun. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfc_no1fan 13 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 Papaguy, you should have a wee commitee who discuss the decisions, even if its only a quick "aye it was awful mate" via pm. I nominate me for the commitee. Here Here Good Idea Wants in commitee Great idea, like an 'Unbias RangersMedia Decisions Panel' Say...Kev, Foxy, Myself and Davy? Since this is the brainchild of our wild deliberations? I want in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted August 11, 2008 Author Share Posted August 11, 2008 Papaguy, you should have a wee commitee who discuss the decisions, even if its only a quick "aye it was awful mate" via pm. I nominate me for the commitee. Here Here Good Idea Wants in commitee Great idea, like an 'Unbias RangersMedia Decisions Panel' Say...Kev, Foxy, Myself and Davy? Since this is the brainchild of our wild deliberations? I want in. Will you be honest? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts