govanblue 16,847 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Decisions like this divide the support, Not exactly what we need right now is it?Still clinging on to the hope that this isnt true.Not really a divide. The majority can understand the reasoning for leasing the naming rights of our stadium for profit.About as much of a divide as the DU boycott issue.2 or 3 posters on a personal crusade to make it seem that we are divided. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedtheted 20 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Was it a competition?Aye,to see who was stupid.You win hands down. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
govanblue 16,847 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Was it a competition?No mate, it was a gag.If I put up what I think is a reasonable point, and your reply is simply then there's no point trying to continue with reasoned debate.So upon reflection, maybe there are no winners? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Swsl the voice of reason ffs Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 About as much of a divide as the DU boycott issue.2 or 3 posters on a personal crusade to make it seem that we are divided.Exactly.I can't stop myself questioning their motives in this thread. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Swsl the voice of reason ffsBest if we end it here. Can't get any more ridiculous. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cushynumber 25,178 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Dont talk rubbish mate,CG will do whats best for Rangers.End of.i would caveat that. He will do what's best for our share price Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubyred90 118 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Dont talk rubbish mate,CG will do whats best for Rangers.End of. Shut up ffs. He will do what is best for him.You could argue that is the same thing though. CG is here to make dosh, we all know and respect that.He does shite by Rangers he does shite for him.He does good for the bears we all prosper. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
govanblue 16,847 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Shut up ffs. He will do what is best for him.Some folk find "Shut up" to be inflammatory, as well as a rather poor riposte.But to answer your point - what is best for Rangers is what is best for him - and for me Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jodz 98 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 if true thats a great deal. 7.5 million towards rebuilding a premiership and european squad. its not renaming ibrox, ibrox will always be ibrox. its using it as an advertising tool, i cant see the problem with it myself but im young and thats the era i've been brought up in. having said that, i can understand why older bears will have a problem with it.if after the 3 years are up and we are back playing in europe and can be done without the money, we are under no obligation to re-advertise it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Carpintero 546 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 No mate, it was a gag.If I put up what I think is a reasonable point, and your reply is simply then there's no point trying to continue with reasoned debate.So upon reflection, maybe there are no winners?Damn, i missed it. Sorry, i was laughing at you thinking you could get rid of Green. Not on an online forum there isn't no. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
choochooblue 342 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 I do not see how this is such a big deal amongst our support . In '96 we changed from Ibrox park to Ibrox stadium , if we still have 'Ibrox' in the rebranding for £7.5m then its all good to me . A few on here acting like drama queens tbh. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Carpintero 546 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Some folk find "Shut up" to be inflammatory, as well as a rather poor riposte.But to answer your point - what is best for Rangers is what is best for him - and for mePast that stage now i am afraid, couldn't give two fucks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedtheted 20 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 i would caveat that. He will do what's best for our share priceExactly,which will benefit our club in the long run. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Carpintero 546 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 You could argue that is the same thing though. CG is here to make dosh, we all know and respect that.He does shite by Rangers he does shite for him.He does good for the bears we all prosper.I have a feeling he will win no matter what. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedtheted 20 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Damn, i missed it. Sorry, i was laughing at you thinking you could get rid of Green.Not on an online forum there isn't no. Did you buy shares in Rangers mate? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,006 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Shut up ffs. He will do what is best for him.currently doing what is best for Rangers is what is best for CG Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Carpintero 546 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Did you buy shares in Rangers mate?Absolutely not. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Carpintero 546 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 currently doing what is best for Rangers is what is best for CGThat's a matter of opinion. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedtheted 20 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Absolutely not.So you;ve got nothing to get upset about then,simples. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
govanblue 16,847 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Damn, i missed it. Sorry, i was laughing at you thinking you could get rid of Green.Not on an online forum there isn't no. I assume from that that you have a very limited experience of plc's and shareholders.Look at Ratner's, Yahoo, MAN Group, QLT just to name a few. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chesh 28 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 It will always be Ibrox, but if some company wants to pay us £2.5m a year for 3 years to stick their company name in front of it.....I'll snap your hand off any day of the week! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
govanblue 16,847 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Past that stage now i am afraid, couldn't give two fucks. Well if that's the respect you show for your fellow members, I won't waste my time engaging with you any more.Bye SWSL. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,006 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 That's a matter of opinion.yes indeed but £7.5m over 3 years for a club that cost just over £5m is IN MY OPINION a magnificent piece od business for the club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Am i allowed to say anyone that opposes this is going against the clubs wishes? Or does that only suit peoples arguments on other topics? King Jela and AlBear. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.