The Unofficial Rangers vs celtic podcast

[BlueMe 25,327]

1 minute ago, The Dude said:

And if this not being Rangers related was the issue youd have spent hours greeting about the Ewen Cameron thread or Moet Jill one being in the BD. 

You seem to be really upset over this gif. 

Probably more to do with a friendly celtic related discussion posted in the bears den rather than the lack of a Rangers connection tbh.

I'm not upset mate, i like that gif and I've actually used it myself in the past with gogzy a babns' face on it. I never used it to get a reaction though, it was more to rip the pish iirc.

[born a blue nose 90,847]

Wits going on here 

[The Dude 20,026]

8 minutes ago, govanblue said:

Not having that.

First of all you've got the order wrong twice now.  what happened to the importance of alphabeticising.

Secondly, you'll deny it, but I'll wager that it was your bheast colleagues who manouevered it from Bears (OUR REAL NAME)  to bluenoses, which is what others call us.

 

Bears v Bhoys does not sound half as gay as bheasts v bluenoses.  We've been shafted again you know.

Ill happily take that wager (think I still have the email chain to prove it too) but it was one of the guys on the Rangers side who suggested Bluenoses.

If we were using our 'REAL' name wouldnt it be Teddy Bears rather than Bears. 

Shafted? Its a fucking name. Although, we did realise that some folk would be that childish to make it an issue so decided that the subtitle 'the Unofficial Rangers v celtic Podcast' would have our name first. Although this was all explained at the same time as why Bhoys was before Bluenoses.

[The Dude 20,026]

11 minutes ago, BlueMe said:

Probably more to do with a friendly celtic related discussion posted in the bears den rather than the lack of a Rangers connection tbh.

I'm not upset mate, i like that gif and I've actually used it myself in the past with gogzy a babns' face on it. I never used it to get a reaction though, it was more to rip the pish iirc.

Rip the pish? Exactly what I was doing with it. 

None of that is promoted in the thread. Title makes clear what it is. Dont like it, avoid it. 

[govanblue 16,847]

1 minute ago, The Dude said:

Ill happily take that wager (think I still have the email chain to prove it too) but it was one of the guys on the Rangers side who suggested Bluenoses after the bheasts went on and on about gay porn.

If we were using our 'REAL' name wouldnt it be Teddy Bears rather than Bears.  -OK, I'll take that.  Make it so. 

 

Shafted? Its a fucking name. Although, we did realise that some folk would be that childish to make it an issue so decided that the subtitle 'the Unofficial Rangers v celtic Podcast' would have our name first. Although this was all explained at the same time as why Bhoys was before Bluenoses and paradoxically also before Bears.

Fixed that for you.

 

 

[The Dude 20,026]

Just now, govanblue said:

Fixed that for you.

 

 

Done a terrible job of fixing it.

No, none of them brought it up. I did before we'd even really started throwing ideas around. I also think it rolls of the tongue a little bit better. 

We wont be changing the nane now. We've already got one which we're happy with. 

Some of the other ones we seriously considered (that I remember) were:

The Old Firm Podcast

Glasgow is...: The celtic v Rangers podcast. 

Glasgow is... :The Old Firm podcast.

The Bhoys and the Gers Podcast

Cutting The Allocation: The celtic v Rangers podcast

The Glasgow Divide Podcast

[govanblue 16,847]

16 minutes ago, The Dude said:

blah

Not an inspiring list.

Anyway, to the point in hand - If this thread stays in General Sports, I'm sure it can have a healthy and fulfilling lifespan.  If it gets allowed back in the Bears' Den, there will be unavoidable discord and damage.  Which shall it be Dude?

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,779]

22 hours ago, gogzy said:

There is a massive thread on it in general sports, it's been there for years.

It was removed because it literally has nothing to do with us.

 

21 hours ago, gogzy said:

I didn't read that thread.  it was fucking hundreds of pages long.

The BJK thread was informative to bears to give valuable genuine info primarily but not exclusively on paedo actions in Scotland. It highlighted the truth, and how it's being suppressed in the media, by football authorities, and politically. Invaluable stuff to counter the pro scum propaganda. The majority of the forum seemed to agree where it was, and it gained great traction by many bears on here to highlight truths on social media, and contacting editors, sponsors, mps etc.. Doing similar to what the scum did with us to an extent, but also doing the right thing to expose the issues and demand an independent investigation into abuse in scottish football (yes, including us).

Harry Dunn was discussed at times to so that bears are aware this isnt solely the scum issue, and doesn't exclude self reflection and analysis.

You'd have known this if you'd had a look, which you didnt. Yes it could probably have done with the standard approach of a clean up and warning to keep on track.  Instead you opted not to just stay out (your own advice to others) and leave a popular thread where it was, instead moving it without reading. Now its lost all momentum, in a way I'm sure other clubs campaigns against us never did as a result of their forum admin.

Whilst something as important as that is removed, you've allowed and defended a thread with significant content by scum and about the scum in BD, even originally permitting " bhoys" in the title thread ffs.

Bizarre and disappointing decision making, which imo isnt representative of the view of forum members or indeed other members of the admin / mod team who thankfully see sense and hit the nail on the head 

 

16 hours ago, kplfishtank said:

Bhoys mentioned first in the link 

nitcham also in the link. 

Fucking disgrace. This forum has lost it and honestly think I’m for chucking it. 

Lets allow cunts  to advertise blogs that will have at least 50% tarrier input. 

^^👏👏👏

 

Apologies to anyone upset by taking the thread off topic, even though 22 pages in the podcast content appears not really to have actually been discussed.

[govanblue 16,847]

3 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

 

The BJK thread was informative to bears to give valuable genuine info primarily but not exclusively on paedo actions in Scotland. It highlighted the truth, and how it's being suppressed in the media, by football authorities, and politically. Invaluable stuff to counter the pro scum propaganda. The majority of the forum seemed to agree where it was, and it gained great traction by many bears on here to highlight truths on social media, and contacting editors, sponsors, mps etc.. Doing similar to what the scum did with us to an extent, but also doing the right thing to expose the issues and demand an independent investigation into abuse in scottish football (yes, including us).

Harry Dunn was discussed at times to so that bears are aware this isnt solely the scum issue, and doesn't exclude self reflection and analysis.

You'd have known this if you'd had a look, which you didnt. Yes it could probably have done with the standard approach of a clean up and warning to keep on track.  Instead you opted not to just stay out (your own advice to others) and leave a popular thread where it was, instead moving it without reading. Now its lost all momentum, in a way I'm sure other clubs campaigns against us never did as a result of their forum admin.

Whilst something as important as that is removed, you've allowed and defended a thread with significant content by scum and about the scum in BD, even originally permitting " bhoys" in the title thread ffs.

Bizarre and disappointing decision making, which imo isnt representative of the view of forum members or indeed other members of the admin / mod team who thankfully see sense and hit the nail on the head 

 

^^👏👏👏

 

Apologies to anyone upset by taking the thread odd topic, even though 22 pages in the podcast content appears not really to have actually been discussed.

BJK thread also did not belong in Bears' Den.  Neither thread belongs there.

 

 

[The Dude 20,026]

11 minutes ago, govanblue said:

Not an inspiring list.

Anyway, to the point in hand - If this thread stays in General Sports, I'm sure it can have a healthy and fulfilling lifespan.  If it gets allowed back in the Bears' Den, there will be unavoidable discord and damage.  Which shall it be Dude?

'unavoidable discord and damage' - its a podcast link on a forum ffs. 

[govanblue 16,847]

Just now, The Dude said:

'unavoidable discord and damage' - its a podcast link on a forum ffs. 

it's taig scum in the Bears' Den,  They're barred from there.  Anywhere else in the world, fine.  There's one tiny little Island they're not allowed in.  Respect that.

[The Dude 20,026]

1 minute ago, govanblue said:

it's taig scum in the Bears' Den,  They're barred from there.  Anywhere else in the world, fine.  There's one tiny little Island they're not allowed in.  Respect that.

Unless they're chucking a couple sheckels your way of course. Then you're quite happy to give them some Backup. 

[govanblue 16,847]

Just now, The Dude said:

Unless they're chucking a couple sheckels your way of course. Then you're quite happy to give them some Backup. 

very very cheap jibe mate.  If it's ad hominem time, then we may have  a situation here.  Now would you like to rebut my last point?

[The Dude 20,026]

2 minutes ago, govanblue said:

very very cheap jibe mate.  If it's ad hominem time, then we may have  a situation here.  Now would you like to rebut my last point?

Or you'll throw your toys out the pram again? 😂

[govanblue 16,847]

Just now, The Dude said:

Or you'll throw your toys out the pram again? 😂

no mate, I'll throw you out the pram.  do you want to put me to the test?

[The Dude 20,026]

1 minute ago, govanblue said:

no mate, I'll throw you out the pram.  do you want to put me to the test?

If you want to argue that Backup should stick around thats up to you.

[Straight-Edge-Loyal 6,696]

Just now, The Dude said:

If you want to argue that Backup should stick around thats up to you.

Whatever you think of Backup he is clearly a Rangers man a very odd Rangers man but one nonetheless. 

Unless of course you have proof to the contrary? 

[govanblue 16,847]

Just now, The Dude said:

If you want to argue that Backup should stick around thats up to you.

If you want to try a poor attempt at deflection that's up to you.

In truth, yes, I'd have backup's back before I'd have yours.  He's here for his love for The Rangers, not his 'journalism career'  

But back on topic.  No taig podcasts in the Bears' Den thank you.  

 

[The Dude 20,026]

Just now, Straight-Edge-Loyal said:

Whatever you think of Backup he is clearly a Rangers man a very odd Rangers man but one nonetheless. 

Unless of course you have proof to the contrary? 

He is?

Can't say I'm in any way convinced.

[LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510]

Thread is just a complete car crash at this point. It doesn't even have the entertainment value any more.

[The Dude 20,026]

Just now, govanblue said:

If you want to try a poor attempt at deflection that's up to you.

In truth, yes, I'd have backup's back before I'd have yours.  He's here for his love for The Rangers, not his 'journalism career'  

But back on topic.  No taig podcasts in the Bears' Den thank you.  

 

Interesting theory. One minor flaw though. I signed up here in 2012 when my career was in an entirely different industry. I didn't even consider starting writing until 2013 and it wasn't something that I viewed as a potential career move until late 2014/early 2015.

[govanblue 16,847]

3 minutes ago, The Dude said:

Interesting theory. One minor flaw though. I signed up here in 2012 when my career was in an entirely different industry. I didn't even consider starting writing until 2013 and it wasn't something that I viewed as a potential career move until late 2014/early 2015.

no flaw.  that was then, this is now.  when I signed up, I had no interest in fundraising.  Now, it's almost all I do here.  See any parallels there?  

 

Now can we please put a stop to all this nonsense, and agree that your podcast threads can live out their days quite happily in General Sports?

 

[The Dude 20,026]

Just now, govanblue said:

no flaw.  that was then, this is now.  when I signed up, I had no interest in fundraising.  Now, it's almost all I do here.  See any parallels there?  

 

Now can we please put a stop to all this nonsense, and agree that your podcast threads can live out their days quite happily in General Sports?

 

Not really no. I post very, very few links to my content on here. One a week, maybe two. It's far from 'all i do here' so I fail to see your parallel.

No, I completely disagree they should live out their days' in general sports. particularly not when there's a (several months old) thread about stuff like Moet Jill in the BD on the basis that she's a Rangers fan. I mean ffs, can we have an AC/DC thread in there next? How about one talking about WWE since a couple of wrestlers support us? 

[Straight-Edge-Loyal 6,696]

Just now, The Dude said:

Not really no. I post very, very few links to my content on here. One a week, maybe two. It's far from 'all i do here' so I fail to see your parallel.

No, I completely disagree they should live out their days' in general sports. particularly not when there's a (several months old) thread about stuff like Moet Jill in the BD on the basis that she's a Rangers fan. I mean ffs, can we have an AC/DC thread in there next? How about one talking about WWE since a couple of wrestlers support us? 

The podcast promotes a tarrier view in a less than abusive light it doesn't deserve to be in the Bears Den. 

[6superbarry6 14,159]

1 minute ago, The Dude said:

Not really no. I post very, very few links to my content on here. One a week, maybe two. It's far from 'all i do here' so I fail to see your parallel.

No, I completely disagree they should live out their days' in general sports. particularly not when there's a (several months old) thread about stuff like Moet Jill in the BD on the basis that she's a Rangers fan. I mean ffs, can we have an AC/DC thread in there next? How about one talking about WWE since a couple of wrestlers support us? 

Are moet Jill, AC/DC and said wrestlers stinking fucking taigs? think that’s the issue most have, the vast majority on here couldn’t give a fuck what those reptile bastards think.