geronimoo

Im sure that diddy A Thomson said something about how goverment isn't aloud to help out businesses when they hit hard times, it may have been someone else but I'm sure it was him.

I would like them shut down purely to piss those 2 speccy bastards from the Proclaimers off.

Why doesn't he ask the SPL chaimen that question.

The bottom line is they run nothing more than a Kangaroo Court where the idiots are judge, jury and executioner.

Good on ya Ally.

I was speaking to my friend about Green and I was saying that if Green is at Rangers purely to make money then the only way he could do it would be have a Rangers who are successful, it is hard enough to make money with a football club never mind trying to make money with a team who are failing, IMHO if Green can get Rangers steady and have us back up at the top winning the league and if possible getting us into the Champions League on a regular basis then he can make all the money he wants, and as for stripping the clubs assests then he is a bit late Whyte has beat him to it.

On a serious note if we went to Div3 I wouldn't mind seeing Lauders pull the strip back on, he not as young as he used to be but I think he could handle Div3 and shine in it.

Can't see me following them either.

To be honest the only players I would miss are naismith McGregor and Boca. I will miss papac but to be fair on him he said he was leaving before all this kicked in.

I can't condone punching any cat unless it was done with sporting integrity.

I think there is stuff happening behind the scenes which we don't see, I hate to say it but I think the first 2 to leave is just the start and many if not most will follow them soon.

now we liquidated we will never know how the tax case was going to finish but I'm sure I heard somewhere there was about 10 clubs down south who had used the same scheme, does anyone know who these clubs are.

To be honest if the other supporters want to piss us of then surely keeping us in and taking our money would be a better idea.

I knew David Murray putting that horses head in mad vlads bed was a bad idea and by the way there is no Mafia

Oh the DRAMA !!!

Hard as it may be to take, I can't argue with what he has said, when the chips were down Green was the only 1 who stepped up, the others messed about to much or made silly bids.

Get players and when or if they get good we sell them on for more hasn't Scottish football trams been doing that for decades.

It would be good if Walter was in charge, but then again where was Walter and his consortium when we needed them most, some like Green others don't but the bottom line is he is going to stay so best if everyone just stops splitting and get back to supporting the team, if walter and his Consortium want rangers that bad then make Green an offer, I'm not one for reading headlines of both parties throwing statements back and forth using the media and as I said I would like Walter back but he has to either put up or shut up.

Any man who is willing to put money into Rangers in the state it is in deserves a chance, even if the CVA was accepted there was a lot of work still needing done and he was willing to do this also, the Blue Knight followers will always have a problem but there nothing that can be done there.

It will just be what we already know only it will be rubber stamped.

IMHO as much as it hurts me to say this but Liquidation looks like it is the best thing to happen to us, debt wise we were up to our necks in the shit this way we are not but I would like to see us pay off our football debts to all the clubs including the haters. I wouldn't mind if we went into Div3 not just to hurt the other clubs coz personally IMHO screw them I don't really care or have any time for them but if we do go the Div3 way it would give us time to lick our wounds and come back stronger, since we would be in Div3 we wouldn't attract the same callibre of player so our youngsters would get a proper run and hopefully when we get back in the SPL we will have a team of seasoned young Scottish players and have the option to buy quality players as we aren't crippled by debt.

My vote is both.

The thing is if anyone says no, which the are entitled to do then we are looking at a Newco route where they get nothing, all I heard on Clyde 1 all last season was the potato pickers saying HMRC refuse to accept them and how it was set in stone on their website that it wouldn't be accepted but a quick google says different, there are conditions such as it must be structured properly to name 1 but it more or less says it must be workable and not something stupid like we owe you a truck load of cash spo how about we give you £20.

Tbh I don't know who to trust now.

The transfer embargo against us says we can only sign players under 18 years old, how would this stand in a court of law. If we use Rino as an example he has said he wants to come and play at Rangers, Rino is now about 34 years old but under the SFA he is not allowed as for him to come and play at Rangers he has to be under the age of 18. If anyone went for a job somewhere and was told they couldn't get it purely on age the employers would be breaking the law, as far as I'm aware you cannot stop someone from working based on criteria like age, colour, nationality or sexual preference among other things the only jobs I know where someone can be refused a job based on the person themself is jobs like toilet atttendant where obviously you couldn't have a man working in a womans toilet and vice versa with a woman in a mans toilet. The bottom line is at present people are being refused employment based on their age.