Jump to content

nimrod

First Team
  • Posts

    376
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by nimrod

  1. A few bowls of porridge will soon sort that. It's the skill that's important. Might not be a good idea to expose him to the third division war zone tho' with it's large number of hammer throwers.
  2. Sounds more like the PFA on a witch hunt than any great number of players. And if the arbitration panel is the SFA we might as well get the vaseline out now.
  3. Can't see anybody having to pay for unused tickets under any circumstance. When clubs request an allocation they're estimating how many they can sell so if they were coming to Ibrox and took say 1500 tickets and only sold 1200 then they'd just hand back the rest. If we are deemed to be out of order then there would be no downside IMO in taking the allocation as long as Bears stand firm and refuse to buy any. In fact that would probably cause more of a disruption if the unsold tickets don't need to be returned until the day before the game.
  4. Divide and conquer. This is a dangerous situation. However the SFL need to believe they hold the aces here and keep their nerve. There's no way Rangers can be in the top 24 teams in a ranking sense for next season so this 'invitation' idea takes a sinister turn. Keep yer cards close to your chest Charlie lad and watch who is standing behind ya with a knife in their hand Despite our 3rd Div status our fan base gives us real clout in all this. We need to use this clout wisely to keep these clowns from totally wrecking the Scottish game.
  5. Nice thought but there is no way it'll happen. SFA won't entertain it. Sky won't entertain it.
  6. Watch this space. Tbh I'd buy a ticket for the infighting which is about to kick off.
  7. This reminds me of Orjan Persson when he was at Ibrox. Whenever he got man-marked by their RB he used to go and man-mark their LB. Quite comical watching the three of them.
  8. Personally speaking I don't think the club shoulda done this. It's up to the fans to just not buy the tickets. We'll just have the SFA trying to dream up more different ways of shafting us now. However, having got that off my chest, the entertainment value is reaching mega proportions. Now we know how pissed at us they are I'd milk it to the max. Insist on our gate share and lobby for the highest possible ticket price. I doubt we'll ever see any money but we should make these choochters pay through the nose if possible. And if the tims are gonna pay to travel up there to support them I'm gonna have to get myself some nappies to watch that one.
  9. And as far as supporting the team goes, how about 20 or 30k standing outside the ground singing our heads off for a couple of hours. No doubt there will be some obscure medieval law banning Rangers fans from the streets of Dundee on days with a 'Y' in them.
  10. I'd not be in the least bit surprised if somebody tried to pull some sort of stunt here with the gate money. Be it Thompson or the SFA. I don't think we've paid enough times yet for last year's cup tie. I wouldn't give them the reek off my shit.
  11. I wish this had been posted afore I started buying Christmas presents.
  12. Aye well done SDM. No case to answer on the EBT front. Now..... A wee word about yer sales policy.
  13. It's nowt to do wi' us. Let the SFL & Elgin sort it. But they've not broken any football rule so taking points would be over zealous. I think their over egging the prices was worse, that's profiteering at fans expense. Over selling just seems to be a big feck up.
  14. We needed something like 75% of creditors (i.e. amount owed) to accept the C.V.A. That was never gonna happen without the bloodsuckers. Tbh we are in a better financial position now than we woulda been with the C.V.A. Only downside is our absence from the top flight although even that is proving to be a blessing I think.
  15. Always thought that a FTTT was as high as it went. Apparently not. I'm firing this off to my local MP. Why don't you do likewise.
  16. Was reading reaction on the BBC site and they keep talking about the tribunal finding that the club did not act illegally. When will these morons get it through their tiny but thick brains that this was never about legality. EBT's were always legal, this was about Rangers appealing a tax bill levied by HMRC and nothing else. All this verdict shows is that we should never be in the position we find ourselves today. We've been royally rogered by that chunt Whyte and it was the treacherous barsteward Murray that let him loose on us.
  17. We should be doing this with vigour. If the scouts are worth their salt they should be judging who is the cream of the crop. We can register U18's now and by the time we get back to the top division (not holding my breath on reconstruction) these guys will be 20ish, plenty old enough.
  18. Aye but a balanced racist. No too fond of whytes either.
  19. Never been a Black fan and didn't want him at Ibrox. But he's one of us now and he's got a point. I can't remember him getting through a game wi' us without some eejit trying to totally clean him out. My dislike of him stems from him being a dirty thug at Hearts but strangely he doesn't seem interested in putting some of the Div 3 hammer throwers in their place, row Z.
  20. I also live daarn saarf and I can reinforce what Sandy says. Mostly the Engerlish media couldn't give a flying about Scottish football. But there is certainly no evidence of an orchestrated campaign against us. In fact your ordinary fan can't understand the way we've been treated tbh. They have no appreciation of the 'cunt' factor that infests the football authorities in Scotland.
  21. How many times are we gonna have to pay this debt. The SPL withheld prize money from last season and said they'd pay that lot off. Now the SFA are pulling the same stunt. This lot would get laughed out of court if we make a challenge against all this sh1te. And it's Felkkin high time we took legal action and put a stop to all this crap. No organisation can be entitled to act the way the SFA/SPL do.
  22. Regardless of what ever argument can be put forward as to who these monies belong to, there is one thing that cannot in any way be argued. And that is the fact that none of this money is in any way the property of the SFA. When the cash is handed over (to who ever), as it surely must, then it should be complete with interest accrued. This double jeopardy attitude that is being used to deny Rangers the money but saddle them with debts must be challenged robustly.. I'd like to see the SFA charged with bringing the game into disrepute.
×
×
  • Create New...