chris_glasgow 2 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 Henry's finshing shits all over Boyds Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mykhailychenko 0 Posted March 12, 2009 Author Share Posted March 12, 2009 jardy just finishing m8 just finishing nothing else... right ive changed my mind boyd couldny play for arsenal but he is still a top finisher well a good finisher at least Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jardy 0 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 jardy just finishing m8 just finishing nothing else... right ive changed my mind boyd couldny play for arsenal but he is still a top finisher well a good finisher at least i agree, but i can name the ones that will jump on you now for saying this, release the anti boyd brigade Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edward 0 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 jardy just finishing m8 just finishing nothing else... right ive changed my mind boyd couldny play for arsenal but he is still a top finisher well a good finisher at least i agree, but i can name the ones that will jump on you now for saying this, release the anti boyd brigade The anti Boyd brigade can **** ***!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC999 0 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 Now its not that i think wenger will be bidding £20,000,000 for big kris anytime soon as it seems most clubs interested in boyd are either top championship or low level premiership, and boyds biggest critisism is that he doesn't score in big games. But with the amount of crosses through balls and the pace of walcot and arshavin counter attacking boyd would get plenty of chances and when boyd gets chances he buries them in the net. He may not be the typical arsenal type player and he is definately not famed for his famous football but you stick boyd in that team with the chances he would get i honestly believe he could eclipse any scoring record. Now this is not meant as a critisism but rangers don't create as many chances as arsenal and boyd doesn't score against the manks the sheep shagers or in europe as we don't really play free flowing attacking football with loads of chances but i believe if boyd went to arsenal, barcelona etc he would be sensational therefore any boyd doubters should realise what an asset we have. What do you think? Im sure Boydy has scored a hatrick agaisnt them at Ibrox. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 I think we should change the name from Rangers Media to Boyd Media - all these threads are becoming ridiculous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jardy 0 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 I think we should change the name from Rangers Media to Boyd Media - all these threads are becoming ridiculous. agreed, alot of them are negative aswel. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledWeegie123 1,265 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 im not saying he is a better footballer in whole but he is up there in terms of finishing. and that is one of arsenals biggest problems is that they play to much football and don't kill the game. boyd might play guff football but he will guarentee you goals, that and arsenal need a solid defencive midfielder, and no before you say it im not going to reccomend christian dailly To suggest that Boyd could/should displace Adebayor, Van Persie, Walcott or Eduardo is just plain silly. This thread is a direct result of the pro-Boyd nonsense that's posted on here daily, I hope people now see why myself and others despise it so much. Maybe those in favour of him despise your view equally Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mykhailychenko 0 Posted March 12, 2009 Author Share Posted March 12, 2009 without boyds goals i believe we would be a lot further behind celtic than we are just now, if miller and lafferty had started the season together with the form they were in to begin with we would be miles behind, boyd has bailed us out just look at the cup final against dundee united last season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 There's far more anti-Boyd guff on here than pro-Boyd Papaguy. And btw ... attacking a Rangers supporter for bigging up a Rangers player is ludicrous. I think some on here are happy being 2nd best in Scotland as it gives them something to moan about. I'm all for talking up our players as I have done plenty, but suggesting Boyd to Arsenal is nonsense. I agree but you seem utterly offended that someone might praise Boyd. I'm a realist among Boyd's fantasisers. If people can't see this, it ain't my problem. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGM_72 3,650 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 Oh dear. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangers4eva 12 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 im not saying he is a better footballer in whole but he is up there in terms of finishing. and that is one of arsenals biggest problems is that they play to much football and don't kill the game. boyd might play guff football but he will guarentee you goals, that and arsenal need a solid defencive midfielder, and no before you say it im not going to reccomend christian dailly To suggest that Boyd could/should displace Adebayor, Van Persie, Walcott or Eduardo is just plain silly. This thread is a direct result of the pro-Boyd nonsense that's posted on here daily, I hope people now see why myself and others despise it so much. Maybe those in favour of him despise your view equally Again, I'm being realistic. I've said time and again that our Mendes/Thomson/Ferguson combo in midfield is Premiership quality, I've said that Bougherra is easily Champions League level, I've pushed McGregor again and again for Scotland's number 1 slot etc. That's all realistic. However, to suggest that Boyd could/should play for Arsenal is complete nonsense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 53,915 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 I'm truly lost for words. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 I'm truly lost for words. I can see me following TMWWBK and not entering the Kris Boyd Den for a while. This thread really takes the biscuit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_glasgow 2 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 what is the fascination with this waster of a player Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoltonLoyal 2 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 different strokes and all that................................ I think Kris Boyd is a fantastic goalscorer, one of the best i've ever seen. The fact is that in any given game, we don't CREATE loads of chances. Therefore Boyd's ability to convert these chances into goals will be more limited than let's say, playing for Arsenal. I think the OP was saying that for all Boyd's dectractors' constant assassination of his abilities, if he did play at Arsenal - then he'd score tons - i agree with him, he would. I'd also argue that Arsenal's recent 17? game unbeaten run would have gleaned more points if they had someone like Boyd up front. For all their nice approach play the one think they have lacked is an old fashioned 'tit-liner', to finish off the multitude of chances they create. Oh and another thing, to whom it may concern- last time i looked, Kris Boyd was still a Rangers player - save your bile for the likes of skippy and vinegar, they're the enemy in case you've forgot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobertN 390 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 If boyd had players laying it on a plate for him he would score a lot no offence but who wouldn't this where boyd fails he expects to just add the finishing touch and take the credit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoltonLoyal 2 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 If boyd had players laying it on a plate for him he would score a lot no offence but who wouldn't this where boyd fails he expects to just add the finishing touch and take the credit Miller. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobertN 390 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 he creates his own missed chances most of the time but Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 53,915 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 Boyd wouldn't score shed loads for Arsenal. He's far too predictable in terms of movement, physicality and ability with and without the ball. While guys like Chris Swales and Ross Tokley think he's a nightmare to play against any half decent defender would be delighted when they read his name on the team sheet for those reasons. Infact I can't believe I'm even wasting my time trying to justify why he wouldn't score goals for Arsenal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 I think we should change the name from Rangers Media to Boyd Media - all these threads are becoming ridiculous. The concept of my generic Boyd thread idea has been shot to pieces the last couple of days. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoltonLoyal 2 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 Boyd wouldn't score shed loads for Arsenal. He's far too predictable in terms of movement, physicality and ability with and without the ball. While guys like Chris Swales and Ross Tokley think he's a nightmare to play against any half decent defender would be delighted when they read his name on the team sheet for those reasons. Infact I can't believe I'm even wasting my time trying to justify why he wouldn't score goals for Arsenal. Opinions opinions DBBTB. I am convinced Boyd will score anywhere he plays, he has the knack that all great goalscorers have of being in the right place at the right time. Doesn't matter what he does anywhere else on the pitch, Miller works his tripe off and more often than not, gets nowhere. But guys defend him because he 'puts in a good shift' What the f*ck does that mean? I'm perplexed. Run round like a tit for 90 mins getting nowhere and you're fine, but be a lazy c*nt, but score the winner and get slated for 'just scoring a goal' I know who'd be on my team sheet first if i was manager. IMO of course Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
polar bear 0 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 I laughed at the thread title. At last we agree on something Boab. Boyd at Arsenal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
macleod1873 0 Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 And if Rangers signed Eduardo................ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts