jbm26896 995 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 very positive team 4-3-3 has walter lost the plot Source? just heard the team on radio clyde they are suggesting 4-3-3 Out - McCulloch - Novo - Fleck In - Edu - Naismith - Beasley would be good to see us attack them from the start That'd be a 4-4-2 with Naismith & Boyd upfront. Alexander Whittaker Bougherra Weir Papac Davis Mendes Edu Beasley Naismith Boyd i shall bow to the experts on here , they guy on the radio suggested 4-3-3, but it is obvious that some on here no better 4-4-2 how people get so excited about proving others wrong amazes me at times Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lad 0 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 I've got a hard on over the whole situation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boab 73 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 I'd be happy with either a 4-3-3 as suggested or a 4-4-2 as also listed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 very positive team 4-3-3 has walter lost the plot Source? just heard the team on radio clyde they are suggesting 4-3-3 Out - McCulloch - Novo - Fleck In - Edu - Naismith - Beasley would be good to see us attack them from the start That'd be a 4-4-2 with Naismith & Boyd upfront. Alexander Whittaker Bougherra Weir Papac Davis Mendes Edu Beasley Naismith Boyd i shall bow to the experts on here , they guy on the radio suggested 4-3-3, but it is obvious that some on here no better 4-4-2 Such as me Exactly the team I suggested bar Naismith in for Novo, which I have to say is a change I'm pleased with. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOLUWDC 1 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 I suppose if it's 4-3-3 then it will be Alexander Whittaker Weir Bougherra Papac Mendes Edu Davis Beasley Boyd Naismith and if it's 4-4-2 then it will be Alexander Whittaker Weir Bougherra Papac Davis Mendes Edu Beasley Boyd Naismith Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Hammer 11 2,869 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 anyone else get the feeling ally picked that team tonight? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgruntled_bear 157 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 It will be a 4-4-2. But the starting 11 is looking good and has options to change Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigy 0 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 It will be a 4-4-2. But the starting 11 is looking good and has options to change It'll be interesting to hear the subs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jardy 0 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 im looking forward to the game now, come on this is our turning point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC999 0 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 442 With Davis coming in a bit centraly like he normaly does Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueboy94 54 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 I really like that team Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wreckedroy 33 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Oh aye, I'm sure we'd be switching to 4-3-3 at this late stage of the season. Dream on children! Tonights team is:- :alexander: :whittaker: :bougherra: :weir: :papac: :davis: :mendes: :edu: :beasley: :boyd: St Mirren 0 - 3 Rangers :21: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wreckedroy 33 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 anyone else get the feeling ally picked that team tonight? No. Why would he? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jardy 0 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Oh aye, I'm sure we'd be switching to 4-3-3 at this late stage of the season. Dream on children! Tonights team is:- :alexander: :whittaker: :bougherra: :weir: :papac: :davis: :mendes: :edu: :beasley: :boyd: St Mirren 0 - 3 Rangers :21: sorry this made me laugh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Hammer 11 2,869 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 anyone else get the feeling ally picked that team tonight? No. Why would he? look at the team again could you honestly see walter picking that team? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ibroxwonder 0 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 RANGERS: Alexander; Whittaker, Bougherra, Weir, Papac; Davis, Edu, Mendes, Beasley; Naismith, Boyd. Subs: G. Smith, Dailly, Novo, Aaron, Velicka, Lennon, Fleck. http://www.rangers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Ne...1620905,00.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigy 0 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 4-5-1/4-3-3 Boyd playing upfront himself with Naismith supporting from the right and Beasley from the left. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jardy 0 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 i would of liked to have seen davis in the centre and novo put on the right but thats not a bad looking team on the whole Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyFRFC 10 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Will either be a decent display from us.....or something utterly depressing with these fringe players who we thought could do a job actually playing mince. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 56,442 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 No complaints with the team from me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigy 0 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 _______________Alexander___________ Whittaker__Bougherra___Weir____Papac ______Davis______Edu____Mendes_____ ___Naismith_________________Beasley__ _________________Boyd______________ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOLUWDC 1 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Good team with good options on the bench Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wreckedroy 33 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 The subs are:- :gsmith: :fleck: :novo: :dailly: :aaron: :velicka: and Lennon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wreckedroy 33 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 4-5-1/4-3-3 Boyd playing upfront himself with Naismith supporting from the right and Beasley from the left. No chance. We only play 4-3-3/4-5-1 against the "better" sides. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 941 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 I like that side. It can change from 4-4-2 to 4-3-3 to 4-5-1 effortlessly. Wish we'd seen more of this during the season from Smith, but I'm pleased with that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts